Archives
Archives
| From: | Matthew Cline <matthew.cline@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: changing CHOST in stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] default stage3) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:16:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | ff4f69a00511221411id49f719ia16bdfc6602e0415@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: changing CHOST in stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] default stage3) by Alexander Skwar |
||
| 1 | On 11/22/05, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Why? What do you expect to gain? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | |
| 6 | The computer I am installing this on is an old Compaq laptop with a |
| 7 | Cyrix MediaGX processor. Everything I have read suggests that this is |
| 8 | equivalent to an i586. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Am I wrong in thinking that the CHOST variable should reflect the kind |
| 11 | of processor in the machine? Wouldn't leaving the CHOST at |
| 12 | "i386-pc-linux-gnu" build unoptimized binaries? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Matt |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: changing CHOST in stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] default stage3) | Matthias Langer <mlangc@×××.at> |
| Re: changing CHOST in stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] default stage3) | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> |