1 |
2008/10/31 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>: |
2 |
> Joshua Murphy wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Markos Chandras <markaki2002@×××××.gr> |
5 |
>> wrote: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> From my experience i would recommend to use alsa-in-kernel + alsa-libs + |
8 |
>>> alsa-headers + alsa-utils + alsa-tools |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> This combination works perfect on my 3 gentoo machines |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> All... *thinks a moment* 6 of mine as well. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> void shameless_plug() |
15 |
> { |
16 |
> One of the reasons I love Gentoo is |
17 |
> because it allowed me to recompile all |
18 |
> apps without ALSA support and use OSS |
19 |
> (version 4) instead which for me worked |
20 |
> much, much better than ALSA. |
21 |
> } |
22 |
> |
23 |
> ;D |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
ok, all of you said alsa in-kernel + alsa-lib + alsa-header is working |
29 |
perfectly. |
30 |
Yes, it's working for me too on my other gentoo box. |
31 |
|
32 |
But i read this after building alsa-lib: |
33 |
* Please try in-kernel ALSA drivers instead of the alsa-drivers ebuild. |
34 |
* If alsa-drivers works for you where a recent kernel does not, we want |
35 |
* to know about this. Our e-mail address is alsa-bugs@g.o |
36 |
* However, if you notice no sound output or instability, please try to |
37 |
* upgrade your kernel to a newer version first. |
38 |
|
39 |
and this makes me think i should get rid of those packages as it say "instead". |
40 |
Is this wrong? do we still need alsa-lib and co.? |