Re: [gentoo-user] PAM auto-adding ".db" suffix: feature or bug?

[Alan McKinnon]

On 23/08/2014 21:21, Jarry wrote:
> Hi Gentoo-users,
>
> after playing with PAM for a few days I discovered one strange
> thing: PAM adds ".db" suffix to database definition on its own!
> What I mean is following:
> _____________________
>
> more /etc/pam.d/postfix
> auth    required  pam_userdb.so  db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users.db
> account required  pam_userdb.so  db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users.db
>
> ls -l /etc/postfix/virtual_users.db
> -rw------- 1 root root 12288 Aug 20 18:45 /etc/postfix/virtual_users.db
>
> testsaslauthd -u user1 -p password1 -s postfix
> 0: NO "authentication failed"
>
> tail -n1 saslauth.log
> saslauthd: pam_userdb(postfix:auth): user_lookup: could not open
> database '/etc/postfix/virtual_users.db': no such file or directory
> ______________________
>
> Then I changed /etc/pam.d/postfix to:
>
> auth    required  pam_userdb.so  db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users
> account required  pam_userdb.so  db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users
>
> And now everything works. But there is no /etc/postfix/virtual_users
> file, only /etc/postfix/virtual_users.db!
>
> So it seems to me PAM adds ".db" to database-definition itself
> and user has to define it without ".db", otherwise what PAM is
> actually looking for is /etc/postfix/virtual_users.db.db
>
> Is this normal? Never seen this "Windows-like" behaviour with
> auto-adding suffix in *nix world. And I did not find anything
> about it in PAM-documentation. It says just:
>
> pam_userdb.so db=/path/database
>
> Not a single word that user has to cut ".db" suffix from
> "database" off. If all this is feature and not bug, then it
> should definitely be mentioned somewhere...


Consult Google and find out more about postfix's postmaps with
particular reference to how it's done if you use db files from sleepycat


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com