1 |
Well, tar is not a part of net-tools, so Doug shouldn't have any |
2 |
problems there ;) |
3 |
|
4 |
Rgds, |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
On 2011-09-02, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:16:05 +0200 |
9 |
> Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net> wrote: |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> Am 01.09.2011 15:47, schrieb Doug Hunley: |
12 |
>> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 22:32, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |
13 |
>> > wrote: |
14 |
>> >> Why do you want to unmerge net-tools, anyway? |
15 |
>> > |
16 |
>> > 'equery depends' shows that nothing needs it, and why keep an entire |
17 |
>> > package around when I have another package installed that does what |
18 |
>> > the first package is supposed to do? ;) |
19 |
>> > |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> `emerge -pv --depclean sys-apps/net-tools` is more reliable than |
23 |
>> equery for finding dependencies. It will tell you that net-tools is |
24 |
>> part of @system. It is generally discouraged for ebuild-developers to |
25 |
>> add dependencies to stuff that belongs to @system. Therefore equery |
26 |
>> does not help you find all dependencies. |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> If you are so eager to remove net-tools, you can try to replace all |
29 |
>> binaries with symlinks to /bin/busybox. It should contain minimal |
30 |
>> implementations for most binaries like hostname. Note that this can |
31 |
>> seriously break your system if the busybox implementation is |
32 |
>> insufficient. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> *Especially* don't use BusyBox tar. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Been there, done that. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> Alan McKinnnon |
42 |
> Systems Engineer^W Technician |
43 |
> Internet Solutions |
44 |
> |
45 |
> 011 575 7585 |
46 |
> alan.mckinnon@×××××.za |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
-- |
53 |
Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer |
54 |
My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/ |