Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which openoffice
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 19:26:54
Message-Id: 200805052023.51171.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Which openoffice by Volker Armin Hemmann
1 On Monday 05 May 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
2 > On Montag, 5. Mai 2008, Wolf Canis wrote:
3
4 > > wolf-di6400 0(0) 03:04 PM ~ # qlop -gH openoffice
5 > > openoffice: Fri May 2 16:22:23 2008: 1 hour, 20 minutes, 38 seconds
6 > > openoffice: Sat May 3 04:06:11 2008: 1 hour, 19 minutes, 12 seconds
7 > > openoffice: 2 times
8 >
9 > emerge -p openoffice-bin|genlop -p
10 > These are the pretended packages: (this may take a while; wait...)
11 >
12 > [ebuild R ] app-office/openoffice-bin-2.4.0
13 >
14 >
15 > Estimated update time: 2 minutes.
16
17 You people don't know what pain means! :-))
18 ----------------------------------
19 [ebuild R ] app-office/openoffice-bin-2.4.0
20
21 Estimated update time: 5 minutes.
22 ----------------------------------
23 [ebuild N ] app-office/openoffice-2.4.0
24
25 Estimated update time: 23 hours, 12 minutes.
26 ----------------------------------
27
28 The funny thing is that this PIII laptop is *significantly* faster than the
29 PIII desktop that had its MoBo blow up on me. The irony of course is that
30 the compiled from source is most needed on those machines that take the
31 longest to emerge.
32 --
33 Regards,
34 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Which openoffice Wolf Canis <wolf.canis@××××××××××.com>