| 1 |
On Monday 07 January 2008, Harry Putnam wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm having a time getting ksh93 to install (build error at the end) |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> USE='static' emerge -v ksh93 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The only other use flag coming up was `nls' |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I wasn't real eager for `static' necessarily but without `static' had |
| 9 |
> already failed and I saw it was a possible flag. Also it might be |
| 10 |
> handy sometime in a trouble situation where only `/ ' is mounted. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> But that discussion is for some other time. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Can anyone interpret this emerge failure and have some educated |
| 15 |
> guesses what I should do to get it to compile. That message follows |
| 16 |
> the eix output below. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4210019.html?sid=a282fd302189d999924b214267ec5b90 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
especially last 4 posts |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Apparently it's a bug, and has been fixed in later versions. You are |
| 23 |
using a stable 2004 version, in your position I would unmask ksh and |
| 24 |
emerge the latest unstable |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 29 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives