1 |
On 05/19/2011 11:20:05 PM, Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
2 |
> Am 19.05.2011 22:32, schrieb Helmut Jarausch: |
3 |
> > Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > no current ati-driver can get along with the recent 2.6.39 kernel |
6 |
> > see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368081 |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Does anybody know a work around? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Hi, |
11 |
> |
12 |
> there are always the open drivers |
13 |
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati |
14 |
> and |
15 |
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd |
16 |
> |
17 |
> If that is not a choice for you then you have to wait for an |
18 |
> (in-)offical patch or a version that works with .39 |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Do you really need .39 now? Living on the bleeding edge comes with |
21 |
> problems of its own. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
No, I don't NEED the 2.6.39, but I'll want to aid in testing and this |
25 |
version promises far better performance - on the file system as well as |
26 |
for concurrent processes since the big kernel lock has gone. |
27 |
|
28 |
The patches which have been posted recently, see |
29 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368081 |
30 |
|
31 |
seem to work (I'm just writing on a machine running 2.6.39 with 4 cores |
32 |
and the patched ati-driver) |
33 |
|
34 |
Helmut. |