1 |
Bruce Hill wrote: |
2 |
> mingdao@workstation ~ $ eselect news read |
3 |
> 2013-09-27-initramfs-required |
4 |
> Title Separate /usr on Linux requires initramfs |
5 |
> Author William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
6 |
> Posted 2013-09-27 |
7 |
> Revision 1 |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Linux systems which have / and /usr on separate file systems but do not |
10 |
> use an initramfs will not be supported starting on 01-Nov-2013. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If you have / and /usr on separate file systems and you are not |
13 |
> currently using an initramfs, you must set one up before this date. |
14 |
> Otherwise, at some point on or after this date, upgrading packages |
15 |
> will make your system unbootable. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> For more information on setting up an initramfs, see this URL: |
18 |
> |
19 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Initramfs/HOWTO |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Due to many upstream changes, properly supporting Linux systems that |
22 |
> have /usr missing at boot time has become increasingly difficult. |
23 |
> Despite all our efforts, it already breaks in some exotic |
24 |
> configurations, and this trend is likely to grow worse. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> For more information on the upstream changes and why using an initramfs |
27 |
> is the cleanest route forward, see the following URLs: |
28 |
> |
29 |
> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken |
30 |
> https://blog.flameeyes.eu/2013/01/the-boot-process |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't have to worry about this. If |
35 |
I do, this could get interesting, again. |
36 |
|
37 |
Dale |
38 |
|
39 |
:-) :-) |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |