1 |
Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Eric Martin <freak4uxxx@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I've seen plenty of emails going around requesting people not top-post |
5 |
>> and not to post via html. I don't think it's as big of a problem as |
6 |
>> this thread makes it out to be. While I'm sure some people do ignore |
7 |
>> posts that fall into those categories, there's not really much you or I |
8 |
>> can do about it. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> I don't like defeatist attitudes just because they're related to |
11 |
> community changes. There are certain parts of the community that can |
12 |
> be readily improved (typically relating to centralized rules, FAQs, |
13 |
> etc) and certain parts that are very difficult to improve (typically |
14 |
> relating to the users' attitudes). |
15 |
> |
16 |
> If someone makes even a passing note of this on the website, then my |
17 |
> single bug report might do the work of several dozen "dont post in |
18 |
> html" mails over time. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
>> Do you honestly believe that people who ignore html emails are doing |
22 |
>> something different than you for ignoring any post you don't care |
23 |
>> about? That argument can be easily silenced when you realize that some |
24 |
>> people "don't care" for html formatted email. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
> That's a pretty easy question to answer and substantiate. Yes. Posts |
27 |
> are typically discriminated upon based on their content. On the other |
28 |
> hand, html posts are discriminated based upon their formatting. This |
29 |
> means questions that people would otherwise have answered get ignored. |
30 |
> Content discrimination is a null transaction. Formatting |
31 |
> discrimination is at some times a null transaction and at some times |
32 |
> negative (friction). |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
I looked at your original post, the person who replied to you did so in |
36 |
a concise manner that he doesn't like html emails. |
37 |
|
38 |
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht |
39 |
<nicolas.s-dev@××××××××.net> wrote: |
40 |
|
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:06:26PM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> |
45 |
>> > > er, anyone? |
46 |
>> |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> > You may try by sending a mail using the text format instead of the HTML |
49 |
> > one. I don't read more than one line when it's written in HTML. I |
50 |
> > suspect that a lot of contributors do the same here. |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> > Please, conform to the netiquette. |
53 |
> |
54 |
|
55 |
That was one of the coldest, most invisible, and hardest to |
56 |
troubleshoot communication errors I've ever seen. I don't even know |
57 |
where to begin. |
58 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
I don't know if he could have made that any clearer. That being said, |
61 |
I'm done contributing to spam on the list. Please bottom post and post |
62 |
in a text only format. For many people (myself included) this is the |
63 |
first mailing list they joined. Nobody was handed a manual up front, |
64 |
for the most part you learn as you go. |