From: | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | PVSCSI vs LSI Logic Parallel/SAS - WAS: Re: [gentoo-user] Best filesystem for virtualized gentoo mail server - WAS: vmWare HowTo / best practices | ||
Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:28:52 | ||
Message-Id: | 5176E0D1.9070807@libertytrek.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Best filesystem for virtualized gentoo mail server - WAS: vmWare HowTo / best practices by Andre Lucas Falco |
1 | On 2013-04-22 8:56 AM, Andre Lucas Falco <alfalco@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 | > 2013/4/21 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 | >> Windows VMs see get an 'LSI Logic SAS', and my gentoo VM gets an |
4 | >> 'LSI Logic Parallel' controller. |
5 | |
6 | > Did you tested using pvscsi? It's improve performance with less cost to |
7 | > CPU usage. |
8 | |
9 | No, I didn't... |
10 | |
11 | It appears there is pvscsi support in the mainline linux kernel, but is |
12 | it rock-solid? Anyone else here running gentoo linux with this driver |
13 | for their primary/boot disk controller? |
14 | |
15 | Also, for my windows server 2008r2 vms, I used the default, which was |
16 | the LSI SAS... I did search and found the knowledgebase article |
17 | describing how to change them, but is the gain really worth the trouble |
18 | (and more importantly, the risk)? |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: PVSCSI vs LSI Logic Parallel/SAS - WAS: Re: [gentoo-user] Best filesystem for virtualized gentoo mail server - WAS: vmWare HowTo / best practices | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |
Re: PVSCSI vs LSI Logic Parallel/SAS - WAS: Re: [gentoo-user] Best filesystem for virtualized gentoo mail server - WAS: vmWare HowTo / best practices | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |