1 |
On 19/12/17 04:25, David Haller wrote: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
5 |
>> On 12/18/2017 02:55 PM, Wol's lists wrote: |
6 |
>>> My router defaults, iirc, to .local. And I thought .home also did the |
7 |
>>> same sort of thing. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Both are reserved: the ".home" TLD is reserved for the Home Networking |
10 |
>> Control Protocol in the RFC 7788 that you cited, and ".local" is |
11 |
>> reserved for some multicast DNS mumbo jumbo in RFC 6762. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> (There is no good choice, and out of the bad ones, ".local" is OK I guess.) |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>>> See RFCs 7788 for .home, and 8244 for .local |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I didn't know about RFC 8244 (it's from October), but it looks like it |
18 |
>> only points out the existing problems. I'll go read it. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>>> I think .local was correctly added to 6761, so that domain CAN be used |
21 |
>>> as your private network's TLD. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> local doesn't appear in RFC 6761, you might be thinking of localhost? |
24 |
>> For ".localhost", the RFC more or less states that your users can assume |
25 |
>> that all addresses resolve to 127.0.0.1, which makes it unsuitable for a |
26 |
>> network with more than one machine. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> ISTR, .localdomain is the new .local... |
29 |
> |
30 |
> BTW: I hate it how .local got ursurped by zeroconf/mDNS. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> -dnh |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
I have used .localdomain for years without issue. VLANS |
36 |
(wifi.localdomain, lan.localdomain etc.) are great if you have the |
37 |
hardware to do it. |
38 |
|
39 |
Using non-official TLD internally shouldn't cause any problems (unless |
40 |
someone is "stupid"). |
41 |
|
42 |
BillK |