1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:54:12 +0200 |
4 |
Jean Magnan de Bornier <jean@×××××××.net> wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> | I've liked the fetchmail->procmail setup as I can have procmail process |
7 |
> | the mail in many ways and even though Opera can do much of that I'ld like |
8 |
> | to keep this process. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> OK, sorry, I remember now why I gave up using opera! |
11 |
> |
12 |
> What you can do is setting up a mail server, (postfix, exim, qmail) as an |
13 |
> imap server on your machine. Fetchmail keeps its business as before, now |
14 |
> feeding your mail server; you can point opera to your server. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Procmail would not be used in this case, but you can organize folders |
17 |
> within opera... |
18 |
|
19 |
Hm, a couple of things here: |
20 |
|
21 |
- both Opera and Pine can talk SMTP. So no need for a SMTP Server (MTA) |
22 |
here (postfix, exim, qmail,...). |
23 |
|
24 |
- fetchmail can use arbitrary MDAs, so even for delivery no need for a |
25 |
mail server (the OP probably knows this as he did only mention |
26 |
fetchmail and procmail). |
27 |
|
28 |
- Pine and Opera have different backends for local mail file storage. |
29 |
|
30 |
- Pine and Opera both support IMAP as backend (can't talk for Opera |
31 |
here, but IMAP using Pine is just amazingly fast). |
32 |
|
33 |
Consequence (same as above cited but a little bit different explained) |
34 |
is: using IMAP backend would probably be the way to go. This could be |
35 |
e.g. Cyrus, UW-Imapd, dovecot, Courier. I have used Cyrus and Dovecot |
36 |
and can recommend both. Cyrus makes sense for multiple users and for |
37 |
those who like the Sieve mailfilter (like me). |
38 |
|
39 |
IMAP servers usually bring their own utility for dropping mails into |
40 |
the mailstore. One would pipe the mail from procmail into such a |
41 |
program and configure Pine/Opera/other MUA to use the IMAP backend. |
42 |
|
43 |
-hwh |
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |