Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [OT] Was re: [gentoo-user] system uptime
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 14:20:03
Message-Id: 3249197.iJfJjE2SZK@wstn
In Reply to: Re: [OT] Was re: [gentoo-user] system uptime by Alan McKinnon
1 On Monday 31 August 2015 16:39:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
2 > On 31/08/2015 15:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
3
4 > > I won't tell you what systems used a 24-bit processor and 12 or 16 KB of
5 > > 2us core store backed by a 2MB disk (three feet in diameter), for fear of
6 > > frightening you. ;-)
7 >
8 > Nah, I have some experience with such things.
9
10 I thought I'd be misunderstood. I meant the purposes the computer systems were
11 put to. In one case it was the closed-loop control of a nuclear power reactor
12 (AGR); in the other the analysis and control of the national power grid. And
13 the lights stayed on!
14
15 > Remember the old horror stories about not smoking in the computer room,
16 > because smoke particles are much bigger than fly height of the disk
17 > heads? The young 'uns here never had to deal with that.
18
19 Yes, of course. Them was the days - when we was young. Miles of 8-hole tape
20 flying around the room. Entering boot code manually on key-switches. Two-day
21 course in maintenance of ASR-33 and KSR-35. Back injury from manhandling a
22 power supply into position. Aye...hmm...
23
24 > We understand each other perfectly;
25
26 Well, that must be a novelty :-)
27
28 --
29 Rgds
30 Peter