1 |
On Monday 31 August 2015 16:39:26 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On 31/08/2015 15:41, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > I won't tell you what systems used a 24-bit processor and 12 or 16 KB of |
5 |
> > 2us core store backed by a 2MB disk (three feet in diameter), for fear of |
6 |
> > frightening you. ;-) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Nah, I have some experience with such things. |
9 |
|
10 |
I thought I'd be misunderstood. I meant the purposes the computer systems were |
11 |
put to. In one case it was the closed-loop control of a nuclear power reactor |
12 |
(AGR); in the other the analysis and control of the national power grid. And |
13 |
the lights stayed on! |
14 |
|
15 |
> Remember the old horror stories about not smoking in the computer room, |
16 |
> because smoke particles are much bigger than fly height of the disk |
17 |
> heads? The young 'uns here never had to deal with that. |
18 |
|
19 |
Yes, of course. Them was the days - when we was young. Miles of 8-hole tape |
20 |
flying around the room. Entering boot code manually on key-switches. Two-day |
21 |
course in maintenance of ASR-33 and KSR-35. Back injury from manhandling a |
22 |
power supply into position. Aye...hmm... |
23 |
|
24 |
> We understand each other perfectly; |
25 |
|
26 |
Well, that must be a novelty :-) |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Rgds |
30 |
Peter |