| 1 |
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:08:49 +0000 |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:40:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > When $LUSER fills up his drive it can be that root is the only user |
| 7 |
> > that can properly mount and access the filesystem. So whatever the |
| 8 |
> > $LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by |
| 9 |
> > root, probably by shuffling stuff around. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I've never failed to fix that by deleting a file as the user that |
| 12 |
> created it, usually the partial file that caused the problem, but I |
| 13 |
> can see why you may want to keep a small amount reserved for that. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> However, I still don't get the "-m 0 increases fragmentation" thing. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yeah, that sounds like an old wives tale urban myth to me too |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'll be wanting to be seeing the output of real diagnostic programs |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 26 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives