| 1 |
On Thursday 30 November 2006 17:37, b.n. wrote: |
| 2 |
[SNIP] |
| 3 |
> Why don't you try? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Maybe he just needed an excuse to finally check out the alternatives. After |
| 6 |
all the performance of firefox is pretty horrific... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
[SNIP] |
| 9 |
> The really appropriate reaction, in the meantime, is filing a bug |
| 10 |
> (because in this you're perfectly right -it's a bug, or at least an |
| 11 |
> annoyance) at the firefox bugzilla, I guess. You're right to complain, |
| 12 |
> that's for sure. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That's assuming it hasn't been filed already. And that it isn't just some |
| 15 |
misconfiguration somewhere. I guess the latter could be tested by temporarily |
| 16 |
moving .mozilla and creating a new profile just to see it that changes it's |
| 17 |
behaviour. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> > Please don't bother about this. Changing browser is not a |
| 20 |
> > life-shattering experience, |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Sure, but editing a tiny text file seems even less life-shattering, IMHO. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It would require adding a line like e.g: |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
<input name="hl" value="en"> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> >and both Opera and Konqueror seem nice |
| 29 |
> > enough. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> They are good software indeed, just like FF. But what will you do when |
| 32 |
> you'll met the next bug with them? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Then at least he knows what the alternatives are.. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives