1 |
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 19:32:57 Paul Hartman wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
3 |
wrote: |
4 |
> > I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk |
5 |
> > indexing function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it |
6 |
> > itself. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> AFAIK it is on the Amarok to-do list now that the speed is good enough |
9 |
> to replace mysql, but nobody has volunteered to take on the challenge |
10 |
> yet. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I think there's also the potential problem of users who don't install |
13 |
> or enable the indexing/semantic-desktop stuff might not be able to use |
14 |
> Amarok then... |
15 |
|
16 |
It could be a build-time option, giving the user a choice |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |