1 |
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann < |
2 |
volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> man mount, also google for 'bind' mounting. |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
Thank you. That was it. IN answer to another query, as to why not symlink, |
10 |
I cannot point to a particular behavior, but I have found that symlinks do |
11 |
not behave in all situations like real hardlinks. What I want it something |
12 |
like a hardlink to a directory. |
13 |
|
14 |
I think this may be possible with bind mounting. |
15 |
|
16 |
One major problem with nautilus or any other GUI file manager---in fact |
17 |
many, many GUI programs that rely on mouse input primarily---has been the |
18 |
loss of subtler capabilities like hard link. I've been looking at using |
19 |
hardlinks to organize my literature collection. A single paper may belong |
20 |
equally in several categories. Or for photos, to go beyond, say, catalogs |
21 |
in gthumbs: catalogs are possibly lost in an upgrade or minor accident. |
22 |
|
23 |
I'd be interested in seeing particular examples of the use of bind mounts |
24 |
for the purposes I propose. Reiterating: |
25 |
|
26 |
- mounting a directory from another tree with a full status in all |
27 |
respects as a directory on the current tree. |
28 |
- mounting a directory in several places. (A subdirectory of |
29 |
microscopical images and another subdirectory of notes can be linked |
30 |
together in the same directory under the specific project or organism under |
31 |
study). |
32 |
|
33 |
Perhaps a more skilled approach to the use of symlinks would serve the same |
34 |
purpose more directly? |
35 |
|
36 |
Thank you again for the input. |
37 |
|
38 |
Alan |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Alan Davis |
44 |
|
45 |
"It's never a matter of liking or disliking ..." |
46 |
---Santa Ynez Chumash Medicine Man |