| 1 |
On Saturday 10 October 2009, meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2 |
| 5 |
> finally. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On gentoo web I found this: 2. |
| 8 |
> Migration to OpenRC |
| 9 |
> Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in |
| 10 |
> as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I tried to check this (emerge -pv openrc) and found: |
| 13 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-apps/openrc" have been masked. |
| 14 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
| 15 |
> request: - sys-apps/openrc-9999 (masked by: missing keyword) |
| 16 |
> - sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 17 |
> - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r4 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 18 |
> - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 19 |
> - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 20 |
> - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 21 |
> - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 22 |
> - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.1-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Especially "masked by: missing keyword" let me doubt whether |
| 25 |
> or not it is sane to migrate.... |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> How to proceed here ? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Many users who populate this list have unmasked it and emerged it without a |
| 30 |
problem. I am still holding onto the stable path and won't be upgrading as |
| 31 |
yet - perhaps because the benefits of doing so are not earth shattering, plus |
| 32 |
I'll have to learn new invocations to update my systems. Mind you, I'll have |
| 33 |
to learn them sooner or later when it becomes stable. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
YMMV. |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Regards, |
| 38 |
Mick |
Archives