Archives
Archives
| From: | "A. Khattri" <ajai@××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Proposed option for etc-update | ||
| Date: | Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:08:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | Pine.BSO.4.58.0508290156490.24511@ida.bway.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Proposed option for etc-update by Kai Ole Schultz |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Kai Ole Schultz wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Why not use dispatch-conf instead? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Because it has some annoying quirks of its own that made me go back to |
| 6 | etc-update. Etc-update would be perfect if it had the archiving features |
| 7 | added to it. That said, I would rather use it (and be very very careful) |
| 8 | rather than put up with dispatch-conf. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Proposed option for etc-update | "Michael W. Holdeman" <lists@××××.org> |