| 1 |
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:20:04 -0400 |
| 2 |
Doug Hunley <doug.hunley@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen |
| 5 |
> <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Why not copy them over and create a symlink for "legacy"-reasons? |
| 7 |
> > I'd guess that every stable version of portage will support it, |
| 8 |
> > because that change (to the stage 3) wouldn't make sense otherwise. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I did that a long time ago, actually :) |
| 11 |
> I was hoping to remove the symlinks now and it looks like I can based |
| 12 |
> on the -dev post by Zac |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
My test VMs all run stable and all have make.conf in /etc/portage. They |
| 16 |
all range from 12 - 18 months old |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 20 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives