Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Python update question
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:29:27
Message-Id: CAK2H+eckbEjPvyj61KtaMMF37OjOjaYwJ4f3VO8fq-KpaCr_vQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Python update question by Dale
1 On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Howdy,
3 >
4 > I'm just wanting to make certain I don't break my rig.  Info first:
5 >
6 > root@fireball / # eselect python list
7 > Available Python interpreters:
8 >  [1]   python2.7 *
9 >  [2]   python3.1
10 >  [3]   python3.2
11 > root@fireball / #
12 >
13 > I ran --depclean and it wants to remove python 3.1.  I ran python
14 > updater and recompiled the needed packages.  Since python 2.7 is the
15 > default python, is it safe to remove python 3.1?  As we all know, python
16 > and portage is really good friends and portage gets real upset when it
17 > looses its friend.  I'd much rather ask this question than have to start
18 > a thread on how to repair python with a dead portage.
19 >
20 > So, safe to remove?  I'm thinking it is but just want the comfort of
21 > taking someone else with me it is breaks.  lol
22 >
23 > Dale
24 >
25
26 You should be safe but please do an
27
28 eselect python list --python3
29
30 and make sure you're set to 3.2 before removing 3.1.
31
32 HTH,
33 Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Python update question Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-user] Python update question Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>