| 1 |
On 8/21/06, Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@×××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Monday 21 August 2006 11:24, fei huang wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > yep, that's why I get so frustrated, I did exactly the same as what |
| 6 |
> > the guide instructs.. |
| 7 |
> > any other posibilities that may cause the problem? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Ok, let's see: you say that your eth0 (which I guess is the interface |
| 10 |
> connected to the ADSL and thus to the Internet) has ip address |
| 11 |
> 192.168.0.1. Then, you use this command to start uml: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> UML> linux ubd0=root_fs ubd1=swap_fs eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.0.1 |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> this means that the *host's* tun/tap interface gets ip address |
| 16 |
> 192.168.0.1 as well. So, the host ends up with its two interfaces having |
| 17 |
> the same ip address (do "ip addr" or "ifconfig" when uml is running to |
| 18 |
> confirm this) . |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
yep, I did notice this problem, and tried to change the tun/tap interface |
| 22 |
to 192.168.0.3, |
| 23 |
I guess this must be the same network with eth0 of my host system,, but no |
| 24 |
luck... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If the above is true, try using different addresses for the tun/tap<->uml |
| 27 |
> network, for example from the 10.0.0.0 pool. |
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I'll try it out... hope this works. thanks. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
regards. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
daniel. |
Archives