| 1 |
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:17:35AM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked: |
| 2 |
> emerge -n pwdb |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Actually, don't do that. Alan gave the right answer, but it seems that |
| 5 |
my portage tree was just a few days out of date. flameeyes just |
| 6 |
removed the dependency for pwdb from pam. (See my other reply for the |
| 7 |
message. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So this might actually explain why depclean and equery depends gave |
| 10 |
you different answers: one was reading the new entry for pam in the |
| 11 |
tree, and one was reading the old entry for (the same version... why |
| 12 |
didn't they bump the version?) pam in /var/db. And since the version |
| 13 |
was not bumped, your emerge --update world or whatever did not think |
| 14 |
to rebuild pam (and copy the new ebuild to /var/db).... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
A weird incident at that. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Best wishes, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
W |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
One man's vacuum is another man's sewer. |
| 23 |
~N. Milleron |
| 24 |
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 433 days, 2:45 |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives