1 |
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 00:54 +0200, b.n. wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> That's why I asked if there is some Linux that is not "a little bit" but |
4 |
> *wildly* different, as to be almost unrecognizable as the Linux we're |
5 |
> all familiar with (that usually is done by a bash/zsh/ksh shell + other |
6 |
> gnu coreutils etc.) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> For a (theoretical) example, imagine a system that boots in the Windows |
9 |
> Powershell on top of the Linux kernel. |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
Now that you mention it, I think there is a PLC manufacturer that has a |
13 |
"real time windows CE" environment. It works because they use a Linux |
14 |
kernel with the low latency and real-time options, which only hands over |
15 |
run time to windows when it decides it can. I was reading about it a |
16 |
while back... If you want I could dig up some more? |
17 |
|
18 |
cya, |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
21 |
|
22 |
You can do more with a kind word and a gun than with just a kind word. |
23 |
- Al Capone |