1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:19:28 -0500, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>>>> The SD standard says >33G should use exFAT, this is why many devices |
5 |
>>>>> state they only support cards up to 32G. The really mean they only |
6 |
>>>>> support FAT. My Dashcam is like this but it happily works with a |
7 |
>>>>> 128G card, once I reformatted it with FAT. |
8 |
>>>> Warning; that still does not change the fact that each individual |
9 |
>>>> file cannot exceed 4G in size on regular FAT. |
10 |
>>> That's right, but a device designed to work with only FAT should never |
11 |
>>> try to save larger files. Any such devices I have used tend to split |
12 |
>>> videos into chunks of 1GB or smaller. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> So if I bought a 64GB card, I forced it to be formatted with FAT on say |
17 |
>> my Linux box here, it would work in my trail cameras anyway? It makes |
18 |
>> sense. It would seem it is more of a file system issue since accessing |
19 |
>> a device shouldn't be affected my its capacity, well, maybe some |
20 |
>> exceptions. My trail camera may only support FAT which is only found on |
21 |
>> 32GB and smaller. I can get that. |
22 |
> It should work, but don't cry to me if it doesn't ;-) |
23 |
> |
24 |
>> To be honest, even tho I leave that thing out there sometimes for months |
25 |
>> without checking it, and it takes a ton of pics, I don't recall it even |
26 |
>> going over a couple GBs or so. Even the one that takes videos doesn't |
27 |
>> store a lot of data. I don't think I'd buy that expensive a card but |
28 |
>> still, interesting that it is a option. I'm thinking even my Canon |
29 |
>> camera can handle this. That's a lot of pics tho. |
30 |
> My dashcam really eats up the space. If I forget to turn it off at night, |
31 |
> even a 128G card only holds abut 2 days of video. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
The pics are usually black and white with IR lighting. There is |
37 |
occasional day pics but most of them are squirrels or something. Deer |
38 |
at times but not to much. The pics are fairly small files. The pics |
39 |
are usually around 1MG with 1.5MB being about the largest. There may be |
40 |
a rare 2MB or so. Days pics are color but night pics are black and white. |
41 |
|
42 |
The videos are usually around 12 to 15MBs for night and 50MBs for day |
43 |
videos which are color. Videos are about 30 seconds long. I wish I |
44 |
could select a minute or more at times. For what it does, the cameras |
45 |
work fairly well. They are two different brands but one takes good |
46 |
video and one takes good pics. |
47 |
|
48 |
I can see why they limited it to 32GBs. If you do the math, even with |
49 |
video, that's a lot of files. Plus, they may have to pay to use some |
50 |
other file system or something. I don't know if anyone still owns those |
51 |
things or not. If I ever get a large card, I may try it just to see if |
52 |
it works. Honestly tho, that's a lot of pics/videos. I could leave it |
53 |
out there for a year and likely not fill up a 32GB card. Still |
54 |
interesting tho. |
55 |
|
56 |
I got the cards a few minutes ago. Everything is working like it |
57 |
should. The cards I pulled today have not been reformatted yet. I did |
58 |
reformat the pic trail camera card that I left in the woods tho. I |
59 |
can't see the display to well on the video one. I usually bring it back |
60 |
to the house and pull out a magnifying glass. lol I did my updates and |
61 |
I suspect it was a bug and the update fixed it. There was a plasma |
62 |
update that was done last night which I guess included Device Notifier. |
63 |
Still, reformatting the cards isn't a bad idea. They haven't been |
64 |
reformatted in at least a year, maybe even much longer than that. |
65 |
|
66 |
Time will tell tho. |
67 |
|
68 |
Dale |
69 |
|
70 |
:-) :-) |