| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 2:28 PM <tuxic@××××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Since the unstable packages of today are the stable packages of |
| 4 |
> tommorrow one needs to bite the bullet (and hopefully this sentence |
| 5 |
> is not complete nonsense...I am no native speaker...not at all!) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Presumably if you're running stable on a host you probably wouldn't |
| 9 |
want to be biting the bullet on that particular host. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
In any case, it seems likely that the news item shouldn't have been |
| 12 |
displayed to stable users, or should have had instructions pertaining |
| 13 |
to who it was targeted at. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Of course, it shouldn't have been displayed for anybody considering it |
| 16 |
was never reviewed as required by GLEP 42. Stuff like this is the |
| 17 |
reason these are supposed to be reviewed... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives