| 1 |
În ziua de joi, 9 august 2018, la 11:37:38 EEST, Neil Bothwick a scris: |
| 2 |
> I agree with all of this and I would also add Duplicity as a possible |
| 3 |
> candidate, although not quite as simple to use as BorgBackup (I haven't |
| 4 |
> tried Dirvish) I usually end up putting a wrapper script around such tasks |
| 5 |
> anyway. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I've been using Duplicity in production for a few years. |
| 8 |
I find its features quite better than borgbackup. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
However, it has one very annoying design problem: the local cache. |
| 11 |
In my case, doing daily backups for two years for ~200GB of data |
| 12 |
requires a growing and growing local cache. It's 50GB as of now. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
You delete the cache and it comes back when doing the next |
| 15 |
incremental backup. |
Archives