| 1 |
On 10/03/2013 23:07, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 |
>> All those examples you give are much like a bunch of home machines |
| 3 |
>> > sitting behind a NAT gateway onto the internet. That's actually OK |
| 4 |
>> > and I reckon that is the intended use of NAT. |
| 5 |
> I want to point out that that's only true if the home network has at |
| 6 |
> least one public IP. If you've got NAT 4x4, you're kinda screwed. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> (Alan will understand that, but for those unfamiliar with it, that |
| 9 |
> basically means that if your home router is given an RFC1918 address by |
| 10 |
> your ISP, port forwarding isn't going to do squat for you.) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'm getting images of NATted traffic being NATted. My head just exploded. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 19 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives