| 1 |
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:13:47 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ralph Seichter <gentoo-user@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi list members, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I set up Gentoo as an NFS server, and I am experiencing problems with |
| 7 |
> one of my NFS clients. When this specific client creates new |
| 8 |
> directories within the NFS-exported directory, the permissions are |
| 9 |
> 0644 instead of 0755 ('executable' is missing). The client does not |
| 10 |
> allow passing any arguments when mounting a remote directory, so I |
| 11 |
> wonder if this can be fixed on the server side? My exports |
| 12 |
> configuration looks like this: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> # /etc/exports |
| 15 |
> /mnt/foo |
| 16 |
> 192.168.235.0/24(rw,async,all_squash,no_subtree_check,anonuid=1003,anongid=1003,insecure) /mnt/bar |
| 17 |
> 192.168.235.0/24(rw,sync,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,anonuid=1003,anongid=1003,insecure) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Both /mnt/foo and /mnt/bar were created like this: |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> mkdir /mnt/foo && chown root:root /mnt/foo && chmod 1777 /mnt/foo |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> It does not matter whether the client creates a new directory |
| 24 |
> in /mnt/foo or /mnt/bar, the executable bit is always missing. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Your ideas are appreciated. Thanks! |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
What sort of client is this, and what umask is it using? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
That's regular shell umask, not some fancy thing related to fs mounts. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 35 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives