| 1 |
>>> With the kernel's own 2.6.25, my "dmesg|grep -i drm" says: |
| 2 |
>>> Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 |
| 3 |
>>> Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on |
| 4 |
>>> minor 0 |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Yep, I'm using it (and the kernel module) and I get the same output of |
| 7 |
>> "dmesg | grep drm" |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> If I remember correctly, only =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 worked for me |
| 10 |
>> (at least there was a reason for me to put it |
| 11 |
>> in /etc/portage/package.keywords) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Looking at the sources of that exact version (20071019), i think the |
| 14 |
> output should be "Initialized i915 1.11.0 20071019". |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> At least the date should match. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
So now, after downgrading to 2.6.24.5 and installing x11-drm, i get the |
| 19 |
following output: |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
[drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 |
| 22 |
[drm] Initialized i915 1.11.0 20070209 on minor 0 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
So indeed, the version is higher than the kernel's driver. But |
| 26 |
unfortunatly, i couldn't find any things that are actually fixed now. |
Archives