1 |
On Sunday 26 February 2006 17:51, "Pete" <pi2list@×××××××.com> wrote about |
2 |
'[gentoo-user] system boot': |
3 |
> This is what I don't understand |
4 |
> |
5 |
> ------------------ |
6 |
> |
7 |
> yababa root # ls -l /boot/ |
8 |
> total 1272 |
9 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 483904 Feb 26 04:56 |
10 |
> System.map-2.4.19r10AR lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Jan 12 |
11 |
> 2003 boot -> . -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 814688 Feb 26 04:40 |
12 |
> bzImageAR yababa root # |
13 |
> |
14 |
> --------------------- |
15 |
> |
16 |
> boot points to itself. |
17 |
|
18 |
That's pretty standard. From my system: |
19 |
|
20 |
# mount /boot |
21 |
# ls /boot/boot -l |
22 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Jan 30 10:46 /boot/boot -> . |
23 |
# umount /boot |
24 |
# ls /boot -l |
25 |
total 0 |
26 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Aug 6 2005 boot -> . |
27 |
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Jan 31 09:29 grub |
28 |
|
29 |
Not really sure why that grub directory is in there... |
30 |
|
31 |
> Before I copied the System.map-2.4.19r10AR and |
32 |
> bzImageAR, there was nothing in there. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> How does the system boot? ? ? |
35 |
|
36 |
Could boot be on a separate partition? Check /etc/fstab. |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
"If there's one thing we've established over the years, |
40 |
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest |
41 |
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." |
42 |
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh |
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |