1 |
Hi, ipv6 is a newer protocol that is meant to substitute the actual |
2 |
ipv4. IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run. Since the actual |
3 |
protocol is version 4 there is no need to include a specific flag for |
4 |
it. And my suggestion is, use "-ipv6" since you probably doesn't have |
5 |
the hardware for it. |
6 |
|
7 |
The second point is, will you be using your FTP inside you private |
8 |
network or will it be available to the rest of the world?? If you |
9 |
intent to make it available to the rest of the world or just for you |
10 |
to use via internet, witch means you'll have to leave the FTP port |
11 |
opened, I really suggest you no to use FTP!! Use SCP (ssh) instead. |
12 |
Since it requires user authentication via a secure protocol. FTP is |
13 |
known to be a very big security danger! |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
17 |
Luiz Carlos Guidolin Aluno de Mestrado |
18 |
Lab. de Física de Plasmas - TOKAMAK TCABR - IFUSP |
19 |
lcguid@×××××.com (particular) lcguid@××××××.br (USP) |
20 |
............................................................................................ |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
On 3/21/06, maxim wexler <blissfix@×××××.com> wrote: |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> --- Franta <sdoma@××××××××.cz> wrote: |
27 |
> |
28 |
> > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:43 -0800, maxim wexler |
29 |
> > wrote: |
30 |
> > > Hi, |
31 |
> > > |
32 |
> > > Oops, lost the thread "turning off dhcp" end. |
33 |
> > > |
34 |
> > > Thanks to Neil. Both boxen can ping each other. |
35 |
> > > |
36 |
> > > Now to clear up a few loose ends: |
37 |
> > > |
38 |
> > > Why on the fresh(2.6.15) install does net.eth0 |
39 |
> > start |
40 |
> > > automatically and the older(2.6.12) have to be |
41 |
> > started |
42 |
> > > manually? Is this a bug or a feature? |
43 |
> > > |
44 |
> > > I note the abundance of choices in |
45 |
> > portage/net-ftp. |
46 |
> > > What do I need? I'll just be moving files back and |
47 |
> > > forth. I don't think security is an issue. Is ftp |
48 |
> > all |
49 |
> > > I need? The 2.6.12(Sempron) will be the "main" |
50 |
> > > machine, connected to the web via diallup. |
51 |
> > > The 2.6.15(K6) I plan to use as a platform for |
52 |
> > micro |
53 |
> > > develpt. |
54 |
> > > |
55 |
> > > emerge -pv ftp on the 2.6.12 |
56 |
> > > Calculating dependencies ...done! |
57 |
> > > [ebuild N ] net-ftp/ftp-0.17-r3 +ssl 52 kB |
58 |
> > > |
59 |
> > > but the 2.6.15 adds the +ipv6 flag. Neither |
60 |
> > make.conf |
61 |
> > > mentions it. Does the .15, AMD K6-2, know |
62 |
> > something I |
63 |
> > > don't? |
64 |
> > > |
65 |
> > > -Maxim |
66 |
> > > |
67 |
> > > __________________________________________________ |
68 |
> > > Do You Yahoo!? |
69 |
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam |
70 |
> > protection around |
71 |
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com |
72 |
> > |
73 |
> > Hi, |
74 |
> > |
75 |
> > I had issues on various packages after an emerge |
76 |
> > update too. I think it |
77 |
> > was a baselayout issue. Seems the new baselayout |
78 |
> > (dunno from what time |
79 |
> > on) doesn't handle kernels prior to 2.6.14 |
80 |
> > correctly. Downgrade your |
81 |
> > portage and see when all for kernel 2.6.12 starts |
82 |
> > working again. |
83 |
> > |
84 |
> > Just a thought |
85 |
> > Frank |
86 |
> |
87 |
> Well, I just finished sync'ing portage and immediately |
88 |
> did an emerge -pv ftp and, sure enough, there was the |
89 |
> +ipv6 flag |
90 |
> |
91 |
> |
92 |
> from ipv6.org: |
93 |
> |
94 |
> IPv6 is short for "Internet Protocol Version 6". IPv6 |
95 |
> is the "next generation" protocol designed by the IETF |
96 |
> to replace the current version Internet Protocol, IP |
97 |
> Version 4 ("IPv4"). |
98 |
> |
99 |
> I don't see a date on the page. It was at the top of a |
100 |
> google search list. |
101 |
> |
102 |
> "You are using IPv4 from 64.228.98.50" It says, which |
103 |
> is true. |
104 |
> |
105 |
> So, is this the bleeding edge? Anyway, I don't think |
106 |
> I'll need ipv4 *or* -6 since this is just for pc-2-pc |
107 |
> use. |
108 |
> |
109 |
> But now I'm wondering why the +ipv4 flag wasn't added |
110 |
> to the emerge options for the earlier package... |
111 |
> |
112 |
> |
113 |
> > |
114 |
> > |
115 |
> > -- |
116 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
117 |
> > |
118 |
> > |
119 |
> |
120 |
> |
121 |
> __________________________________________________ |
122 |
> Do You Yahoo!? |
123 |
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
124 |
> http://mail.yahoo.com |
125 |
> -- |
126 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
127 |
> |
128 |
> |
129 |
|
130 |
-- |
131 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |