| 1 |
On 5 October 2017 22:45:50 GMT+02:00, christos kotsis <christo.kotsi@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
>I just noticed that ReiserFS has significant performance over ext3, 4 |
| 3 |
>when |
| 4 |
>dealing with small files. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>On 5 Oct 2017 11:32 pm, "christos kotsis" <christo.kotsi@×××××.com> |
| 7 |
>wrote: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>If the big data are used often,and I/O performance is desirable, then I |
| 10 |
>would go for two partitions. |
| 11 |
>One would be either ext3 or ext4, with huge block size, while the |
| 12 |
>second |
| 13 |
>could be one of two with small block size(minimum 1024). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>On 5 Oct 2017 10:46 pm, <pat@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>Hi, |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>Installing gentoo on new laptop and it has 2TB disk. I want to use |
| 21 |
>1.8TB |
| 22 |
>for data where will be big files and also huge amount of small files, |
| 23 |
>thus |
| 24 |
>I want to ask which FS is best for this. Until now I've used reiserfs |
| 25 |
>on |
| 26 |
>cca 0.5TB partition, but I don't know if it's also good choice for that |
| 27 |
>big |
| 28 |
>partition. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
>I've thought about zfs, but I don't need snapshots and such stuff |
| 31 |
>mostly |
| 32 |
>scaling is requirement. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
>Thanks |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
>Pat |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
>---------------------------------------- |
| 39 |
>Freehosting PIPNI - http://www.pipni.cz/ |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
I had a large partition with reiserfs. |
| 42 |
Running fsck always failed due to running out of memory. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Partition was quite a bit larger than 2TB (around 6TB) and contained a huge (millions) amount of files, but having an fsck become impossible with 16GB memory available was rather annoying. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
Joost |
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
Archives