| 1 |
On Sonntag 15 Februar 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote: |
| 2 |
> El Dom, 15 de Febrero de 2009, 16:59, Volker Armin Hemmann escribió: |
| 3 |
> > On Montag 02 Februar 2009, Stroller wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > the best thing would be to wait for another year before you even think |
| 6 |
> > about touching that mess. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> If by "that mess" you mean ext4, you should know that it's |
| 9 |
> just as stable as ext3. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
so ext3 is completly broken? likes to deadlock? and is mostly untested? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
ext4 is new. It was just declared stable. It is not. It has to prove itself to |
| 14 |
be stable in the next 6 to 12 month. Earlier than that it is not stable. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
But if you look at all the problems reported on lkml you should come to the |
| 17 |
conclusion, that both ext3 and 4 are unstable. It is just wrong to pile new |
| 18 |
features unto an aging platform instead of making the cut, put one into |
| 19 |
maintanence mode and start from a clean state. Some did it. extX never did. |
| 20 |
With the bad results easily visible for everybody who wants to see. |
Archives