1 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > Got it, finally :-) |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > fail2ban wants sys-apps/systemd[python(-)], and systemd-219_p112 is the |
7 |
> > highest version with an explicit python USE flag. All later versions do |
8 |
> > not have the flag at all. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Your choices are either to have fail2ban fixed to deal with recent |
11 |
> > systemd USE, and tolerate the systemd downgrade meanwhile; or to replace |
12 |
> > fail2ban with something equivalent |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Sounds like this is covered by: |
16 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558168 |
17 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555502 |
18 |
> |
19 |
> It seems to me like this is a portage issue with the resolver. |
20 |
> Running emerge -1 python-systemd sounds like it fixes the issue. |
21 |
> Apparently once it is installed portage will figure out it needs to |
22 |
> hang onto it. |
23 |
|
24 |
And portage will not let me do that even though I have removed the |
25 |
explicit python use flag from sys-apps/systemd -- in fact it will not |
26 |
let me reinstall the same version of systemd without the python use |
27 |
flag. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
32 |
How do |
33 |
you spend it? |
34 |
|
35 |
John Covici |
36 |
covici@××××××××××.com |