Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: David Haller <gentoo@×××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate ST8000NM0065 PMR or SMR plus NAS SAS SATA question
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 15:39:58
Message-Id: 20200523153625.ubqae74xszpzxg5m@grusum.endjinn.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate ST8000NM0065 PMR or SMR plus NAS SAS SATA question by antlists
1 Hello,
2
3 On Fri, 22 May 2020, antlists wrote:
4 >On 22/05/2020 19:23, Rich Freeman wrote:
5 >> A big problem with drive-managed SMR is that it basically has to
6 >> assume the OS is dumb, which means most writes are in-place with no
7 >> trims, assuming the drive even supports trim.
8 >
9 >I think the problem with the current WD Reds is, in part, that the ATA-4 spec
10 >is required to support trim, but the ATA-3 spec is the current version.
11 >Whoops ...
12
13 ATA-8 is the current spec. Though practically unused. The used spec is
14 ATA-7 in virtually all drives for IIRC the last 10ish years or so.
15
16 Did you mean SATA specs? Well, then there's only SATA-1 (1.5GBit/s),
17 SATA-2, (3.0GBit/s) and SATA-3 (6.0GBit/s), and of the latter SATA
18 revision 3.1 introduced TRIM[2]. Oh, and rev. 3.3 introduced some
19 extras for SMR [3].
20
21 HTH,
22 -dnh
23
24 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_ATA
25 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#SATA_revision_3.0_(6_Gbit/s,_600_MB/s,_Serial_ATA-600)
26 [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#SATA_revision_3.3
27
28 --
29 The nice thing about Windows is - It does not just crash, it displays a
30 dialog box and lets you press 'OK' first. (Arno Schaefer's .sig)

Replies