Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: n952162 <n952162@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds for telegram
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:57:23
Message-Id: bc2581cf-ec32-3829-89f8-d0100a3e89b5@web.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds for telegram by n952162
1 Okay, I'm blocked here, at the very beginning:
2
3 sys-apps/portage:0
4
5   (sys-apps/portage-*2.3.89-r3:0*/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
6 merge) pulled in by
7     =sys-apps/portage-2.3.89-r3 (Argument)
8
9   (sys-apps/portage-*2.3.49:0/0*::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
10 sys-apps/portage[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)]
11 required by (app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
12
13 I'm trying to update from 2.3.49 to 2.3.89 and it tells me it has a slot
14 conflict there.  I can hardly delete portage and then add it ...
15
16
17 On 05/16/20 17:38, n952162 wrote:
18 >
19 > e.g.
20 >
21 > sudo emerge -av =*sys-apps/portage-2.3.89-r3
22 > <https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.3.89-r3.ebuild>*
23 >
24 > ?
25 >
26 > I got (amongst tons of other stuff):
27 >
28 >  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
29 >  * installed at the same time on the same system.
30 >
31 >   (app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
32 >     app-portage/gentoolkit required by @selected
33 >
34 > On 05/16/20 16:19, Jack wrote:
35 >> On 5/16/20 8:53 AM, n952162 wrote:
36 >>> I did an emerge --sync and then "emerge -v1 portage" and it blew up all
37 >>> over the place.  Log in the attachment.
38 >>>
39 >>> How can I get things reestablished?  Or, does gentoo simply require a
40 >>> smarter user than me, and I should go back to ubuntu?
41 >>
42 >> I think the bottom line is that Gentoo needs to be updated more often
43 >> than yearly.  Others may also comment, but right now, I think a
44 >> reinstall might be easier than working through all the problems,
45 >> unless you are trying to learn more about how things work.
46 >>
47 >> My first question is why you have portage-9999 unmasked?  I suggest
48 >> going for the lowest version currently in the tree.  I'm not sure if
49 >> your first step should really be portage itself, or upgrading
50 >> packages where the installed version is now masked due to security
51 >> errors or being too out of date.
52 >>
53 >> Jack
54 >>
55 >>>
56 >>>
57 >>> On 05/14/20 23:36, Rich Freeman wrote:
58 >>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 5:10 PM n952162 <n952162@×××.de> wrote:
59 >>>>> On 05/14/20 22:46, Rich Freeman wrote:
60 >>>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 4:13 PM n952162 <n952162@×××.de> wrote:
61 >>>>>>> Action: sync for repo: gentoo, returned code = 0
62 >>>>>>>
63 >>>>>>>     * An update to portage is available. It is _highly_ recommended
64 >>>>>>>     * that you update portage now, before any other packages are
65 >>>>>>> updated.
66 >>>>>>>
67 >>>>>>>     * To update portage, run 'emerge --oneshot portage' now.
68 >>>>>> ...and?  Did you update portage as it was _highly_ recommended that
69 >>>>>> you do so first?  What version of portage are you using? This
70 >>>>>> appears
71 >>>>>> on the top line of emerge --info.
72 >>>>>>
73 >>>>> $ emerge --info
74 >>>>> Portage 2.3.49 (python 3.6.5-final-0, default/linux/x86/17.0,
75 >>>>> gcc-7.3.0,
76 >>>>> glibc-2.26-r7, 4.14.65-gentoo x86_64)
77 >>>> That version of portage has been removed from the repo for over a
78 >>>> year.
79 >>>>
80 >>>> I would update your system so that is current and then try again.  I
81 >>>> believe that version of portage should still support EAPI 7 but there
82 >>>> could be some other issue that is giving it problems with more recent
83 >>>> packages in the tree.
84 >>>>
85 >>>
86 >>
87 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds for telegram Jack <ostroffjh@×××××××××××××××××.net>