1 |
Richard Fish schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
> So dm-crypt today provides the same level of security as loop-AES in |
4 |
> single key mode, which as I already stated in a previous email, should |
5 |
> be sufficient for most people. However, you did ask how it was |
6 |
> insecure! :-) |
7 |
|
8 |
Yep, I did ask and I wish to thank you for your explanation! |
9 |
|
10 |
If I understood you right, the statement that dm-crypt is insecure |
11 |
is, as far as the usage pattern of most of the users will go, nothing |
12 |
but FUD. The statement should at least go like "dm-crypt & loop-AES |
13 |
are all insecure, if used in default mode". |
14 |
|
15 |
Thanks! |
16 |
|
17 |
Alexander Skwar |
18 |
-- |
19 |
You know you're using the computer too much when: |
20 |
u hand in assignments with u and y instead ot you and why |
21 |
-- DEaigo |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |