1 |
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 06:20 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 06:00:40 Tom wrote: |
3 |
> > I played Wolfenstein 3D as I was 7, and Doom when I was 8. |
4 |
> > And I'm in no way disturbed...I think ;) |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > I think you can turn off gore in quake 3,so maybe anything (free) |
7 |
> > derived from that engine also has the option!? |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Tom |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Ok, I'll clarify further: without "kill them!" :-) |
13 |
|
14 |
Ok, here's the thing I don't understand: you don't want your son to |
15 |
actually see that when you shoot a person (or animal) that it bleeds, |
16 |
because, I presume, you tend to find something gory about that. But the |
17 |
act of walking around rooms shooting everything that moves -- that's not |
18 |
gory for some reason? |
19 |
|
20 |
It seems to me that the act of bleeding (we all do it) is in fact |
21 |
natural, and shouldn't be that disturbing compared to the acts of |
22 |
violence committed in FPS to begin with. This is analogous to the |
23 |
ratings board giving a "PG-13" rating to a movie with excessing drug use |
24 |
but an "R" (or worse) rating to a film portraying sex, a natural act. |
25 |
As if to say, "Yeah, shooting up is pretty bad but, hey, at least |
26 |
they're not fucking!". |
27 |
|
28 |
Anyway, if I'm ever unfortunate to find myself on the wrong end of a gun |
29 |
I hope it's by someone who is aware that if/when he pulls the trigger I |
30 |
will bleed as opposed to, say, a person who thinks I'll simply fall down |
31 |
and, after a few seconds, disappear. |
32 |
|
33 |
Note I'm not disputing the game, just the "logic". |
34 |
|
35 |
-a |
36 |
|
37 |
You can have your soap box back now. |