Archives
Archives
| From: | Nils Freydank <nils.freydank@××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.ext4 ... experiences? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:00:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3301657.fPAXtjtmHM@pygoscelis | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.ext4 ... experiences? by Adam Carter |
||
| 1 | [...] |
| 2 | > The fsck.*'s are built in |
| 3 | |
| 4 | I agree: |
| 5 | |
| 6 | % bb |
| 7 | ~ $ which fsck |
| 8 | ~ $ fsck -v |
| 9 | fsck (busybox 1.26.2, 2017-03-12 11:38:12 CET) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | GPG fingerprint: '00EF D31F 1B60 D5DB ADB8 31C1 C0EC E696 0E54 475B' |
| 14 | Nils Freydank |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.ext4 ... experiences? | tuxic@××××××.de |