1 |
Am Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:51:19 -0700 |
2 |
schrieb Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > # mount -o loop,ro -t ntfs usb.img /mnt/usbstick |
5 |
> > NTFS signature is missing. |
6 |
> > Failed to mount '/dev/loop0': Invalid argument |
7 |
> > The device '/dev/loop0' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. |
8 |
> > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a |
9 |
> > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > How else can I get my file from the ddrescue image of the USB stick? |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > - Grant |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Ah, I got it, I just needed to specify the offset when mounting. |
17 |
> Thank you so much everyone. Many hours of work went into the file I |
18 |
> just recovered. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> So I'm done with NTFS forever. Will ext2 somehow allow me to use the |
21 |
> USB stick across Gentoo systems without permission/ownership problems? |
22 |
|
23 |
Long story short: Do not put important files on USB thumb drives. They |
24 |
are known to break unexpected and horribly. They even offer silent data |
25 |
corruption as a hidden feature if stored away for a few weeks or 1-2 |
26 |
years without ever connecting them. |
27 |
|
28 |
By the way: Many thumb drives are internally optimized to FAT and NTFS |
29 |
usage - putting anything else on them puts more stress on the internal |
30 |
flash transition layer, which is most of the time very simple (some |
31 |
drives only do wear leveling where the FAT tables usually are). |
32 |
|
33 |
So using NTFS was probably not your worst decision. Ext2 (or even worse |
34 |
ext3 due to its journal) may very well destroy your thumb drive faster. |
35 |
|
36 |
I was once able to destroy a cheap thumb drive within two weeks by |
37 |
putting something else on it than FAT32, and wrote some multiple 10 GBs |
38 |
to it constantly in small blocks. Now it has unusable blocks spread all |
39 |
over its storage space. I cannot format anything else to it than FAT32 |
40 |
now. I don't use it any longer. It no longer reliable stores files. |
41 |
|
42 |
Most thumb drives also need to refresh their cells internally, this is |
43 |
part of a maintenance process which runs while they are connected. So, |
44 |
you even cannot use them for archive storage. Thumb drives are for |
45 |
temporary storage only, to transport files. But never use them as a |
46 |
single copy of important data. |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Regards, |
50 |
Kai |
51 |
|
52 |
Replies to list-only preferred. |