Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which IPSEC to go?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:03:14
Message-Id: 201001242248.52404.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Which IPSEC to go? by Konstantinos Agouros
1 On Sunday 24 January 2010 21:38:23 Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > since I am a while out of the game of doing ipsec with Linux:
5 > What's the way to go? Strongswan/Openswan or ipsec-tools for kame/racoon.
6
7 Openswan is simpler to configure, although I have not tried it yet. I have
8 however tried to establish a racoon based VPN connection to a router and after
9 I wasted an awful lot of time I gave up. :-(
10
11 I think my problem was that I hadn't set up sysctl (amidst other things) to
12 forward connections correctly. Either way I found the whole IPSec/Racoon
13 experience ridiculously complicated compared to say, ssh.
14
15 > Emerge -p gave me some ~ for ipsec-tools while openswan goes without.
16
17 IPSec-tools will fail to compile lately. To overcome this you need to emerge
18 ~ARCH linux-headers and then emerge ipsec-tools (there's a bug about it). You
19 can downgrade linux-headers after you emerge ipsec-tools.
20
21 > Any input welcome. I need this for a road warrior setup.
22
23 Well, if you need VPN, you need VPN. Personally, I would try to setup a ssh
24 tunnel (using the -D flag) or another SOCKS5 proxy of some sort at home for
25 this purpose and play with mtu sizes to get it to work without fragmentation.
26 If you use ssh I would recommend using public keys and remove passwd
27 authentication.
28
29 However, if you succeed in setting up a VPN connection for road warrior usage
30 please write a HOWTO! I will happily try it to see if it will work with my
31 router. ;-)
32 --
33 Regards,
34 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature