Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libav/ffmpeg's bitrate options have no effect in Gentoo
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:49:57
Message-Id: CA+czFiC5fe_m=Ab3cP++=2FMbPgpHgubMzFpqP1J3KzznxRd+w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: libav/ffmpeg's bitrate options have no effect in Gentoo by Nikos Chantziaras
1 On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote:
2 > On 09/06/2011 05:56 PM, Casper Ti. Vector wrote:
3 >>>
4 >>> Or, more simply:
5 >>> * 'lame' is an MP3 encoder
6 >>> * 'VBR' stands for 'variable bitrate', and offers a better
7 >>> size/quality tradeoff scale than saying "I want 192Kb/s"
8 >>
9 >> Thanks, I understand what LAME and VBR is, but was just mistook the idea
10 >> of the original sentence as "use the `lame' program instead of `ffmpeg'
11 >> or `libav'" :]
12 >
13 > Actually, that's what I meant :-/  Use the 'lame' program.  The package is
14 > "media-sound/lame".  After emerging it, you can encode a file with "lame -V
15 > 0 input.wav"
16
17 You're talking past each other. Casper thought you meant 'lame' as an
18 adjective, not as a proper noun.
19
20 --
21 :wq