1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:22 on Friday 31 December 2010, Dale did |
2 |
opine thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
5 |
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:12 on Friday 31 December 2010, Dale |
6 |
> > did |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > opine thusly: |
9 |
> >> Hi, |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> I'm planning to build a rig like mine for my brother before to long. I |
12 |
> >> know there are lots of opinions on the net but want some personal |
13 |
> >> experience information on this. My brother does not have a UPS. I may |
14 |
> >> can talk him into getting one but not sure. What is a good file system |
15 |
> >> that recovers well from a improper shutdown? I use ext2, ext3 and |
16 |
> >> reiserfs here but never had a power problem, except when hal broke my |
17 |
> >> stuff. I know XFS is not good for this already from my own personal |
18 |
> >> experience. |
19 |
> >> |
20 |
> >> Does anyone here have any personal experience on this? Just a 'I use |
21 |
> >> this and had a power failure and it powered up fine with no data loss' |
22 |
> >> would be nice. If this happened a lot and still worked, that would be |
23 |
> >> even better. |
24 |
> >> |
25 |
> >> I'm not looking to start a turf war. This will be a plain old desktop |
26 |
> >> so it doesn't need a fancy file system, just one that recovers from a |
27 |
> >> power failure. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Down here we have Africa power. |
30 |
> > Africa power makes post-Katrina power look tame. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > Total corruptions in 5 years with reiserfs-3.6 and NO ups in that |
33 |
> > environment = zero. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > I can't fairly comment on ext[234] as I don't have the same length of |
36 |
> > experience with them. From what other commentators have said elsewhere it |
37 |
> > looks like with optimum settings and tweaks they can be just as good as I |
38 |
> > got from reiser, but that's just hearsay from me. |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > My gut feel on this is that any modern fs will be built to be able to |
41 |
> > tolerate blackouts - it's almost a requirement these days. So it's |
42 |
> > likely a 6 and half- dozen question in reality. Except XFS as you know, |
43 |
> > but that's a special case (aggressive caching virtually requires a UPS |
44 |
> > or guaranteed no-downtime power) |
45 |
> |
46 |
> I have /boot on ext2. Portage is on ext3. I have reiserfs on |
47 |
> everything else. I did have the hal problem and a power supply fan that |
48 |
> died and I had to pull the plug. All the file systems I use recovered |
49 |
> nicely after those problems. I didn't lose anything that I know of. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Is reiserfs being maintained anymore? I have read where some say it is |
52 |
> not but I have also read they are working on version 4 and it is being |
53 |
> maintained. Not sure what to believe on this one. |
54 |
|
55 |
When was the last time portage offered you a reiser update? |
56 |
|
57 |
The reiser4progs ebuild has 13 Changelog entries in 2.5 years, 8 of them are |
58 |
stabilisation toe various arches. Current version is 1.0.7 and has been there |
59 |
for 23 months. |
60 |
|
61 |
reiserfsprogs is similar, on 3.6.21 for 23 months and one update (not a |
62 |
stabilisation) since Aug 2007 |
63 |
|
64 |
reiser4 is not in the mainline kernel, and highly unlikely to ever be there |
65 |
according to the last thing I heard Linus say on the matter. Yes, it's in Zen |
66 |
IIRC, but Zen is not mainline. And reiser4 will probably never have a real |
67 |
fsck either (technical restriction - it's plugins that do the work and fsck |
68 |
cannot know what the plugins did) |
69 |
|
70 |
Hans *was* reiserfs for all practical purposes. SuSE funded most of Reiserfs |
71 |
in the early days and they have switched away from it for logistic reasons. |
72 |
|
73 |
Does any of that sound to you like "actively maintained"? |
74 |
|
75 |
It's my opinion that reiser is in security-fix-only mode from whoever is |
76 |
maintaining it. If everything else around it stays the same, the fs will |
77 |
obviously continue working just as it always did. But the surrounding system |
78 |
is not stable, it changes rapidly, especially in kernel space, so the odds are |
79 |
stacked against reiser for bitrot. For all these reasons, I regretfully |
80 |
switched my own systems over to ext4 some time ago. Rieser was a good fs whose |
81 |
time has come and gone and I no longer had warm and fuzzies about the future |
82 |
with it. |
83 |
|
84 |
|
85 |
|
86 |
|
87 |
-- |
88 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |