1 |
Qiangning Hong schreef: |
2 |
> Bryan Whitehead wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Can't you also use the iocharset=utf8 and codepage=utf8? |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> something like: mount -t smbfs -o |
7 |
>> user=<user>,iocharset=utf8,codepage=utf8 \\server\path /mnt/samba |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> This doesn't work? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It doesn't work. There are "?"s in the filenames. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
That's actually a good thing.... I take it you're doing this in a |
16 |
terminal? Which one? Was it compiled with UTF8 support?What font is the |
17 |
terminal using for display? A "?" replacing characters tends to mean (in |
18 |
font-speak) that the character is 'known', but no actual character |
19 |
exists to render under the selected font, or font encoding. So you kinda |
20 |
get a"?" literally because the display doesn't know what to show there, |
21 |
if you see what I'm getting at. |
22 |
|
23 |
Are you able to actually use any of the files properly, even if the |
24 |
filenames are not displayed correctly? Or are you unable to try that, |
25 |
because you just can't read any of the filenames? |
26 |
|
27 |
If your Winbox is Chinese, does your terminal, and the display font |
28 |
chosen for the terminal support Chinese characters? |
29 |
|
30 |
I've gotta tell you, getting UTF8 and font encoding properly set up so |
31 |
that 'special characters' appear correctly across programs and terms can |
32 |
be a pain in the butt, and I'm only needing it for another Latin-based |
33 |
language, not any of the Asian or Cyrillic languages that use a |
34 |
completely different character set. But it's well worth doing, because |
35 |
it's more of a pain to not be able to read filenames or messages because |
36 |
of these stupid '?'s or other 'placeholder' characters that must be used |
37 |
in place of the correct ones when the system is not set up to support |
38 |
the correct ones. |
39 |
|
40 |
Holly |
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |