From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question... | ||
Date: | Wed, 06 May 2009 10:42:12 | ||
Message-Id: | 20090506114203.7cb2ecf8@krikkit.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question... by Anthony Metcalf |
1 | On Wed, 06 May 2009 11:09:50 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > > If the second server is only serving HTTPS, you don't even need that. |
4 | > > Just have the router forward port 80 to the first server and port 443 |
5 | > > to the second. |
6 | > > |
7 | > That leaves the HTTPS server open to the public though, which is |
8 | > specifically not allowed to the OP. |
9 | |
10 | He can use HTTP authentication to prevent that. |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Neil Bothwick |
15 | |
16 | If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question... | Anthony Metcalf <nevyn@××××××××××.uk> |