Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Jonathan Callen <jcallen@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: swift@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: why --noclear not set on tty1 in default /etc/inittab?
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:11:31
Message-Id: 55C65455.7090307@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: why --noclear not set on tty1 in default /etc/inittab? by James
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 08/08/2015 01:37 PM, James wrote:
5 > James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes:
6 >
7 >> there is *no we* in nix unless your or I step up. Fair enough!
8 >> ::
9 >
10 >> git clone --bare https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gli.gitCloning
11 >> into bare repository 'gli.git'... fatal: repository
12 >> 'https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gli.git/' not found
13 >
14 >> It'd be wonderfully appreciated if somebody (anybody) has those
15 >> old installer sources anywhere I can replicate them for
16 >> tweaking.
17 >>
18 >
19 > SVEN created a wonderful repositor of old portage snapshots::
20 >
21 >
22 > http://blog.siphos.be/2013/12/upgrading-old-gentoo-installations/
23 >
24 > But, alas it has "disappeared" too?
25 >
26 > Granted the posted reason is a failure of guidexml:
27 >
28 > "Resource unavailable
29 >
30 > The requested resource uses Gentoo's retired web publication system
31 > GuideXML. As support for GuideXML was disabled on May 18, 2015, the
32 > resource can not be displayed. We hope the author provides an
33 > updated version soon. "
34 >
35 >
36 > So there is no other way to publish archived portage tree
37 > snapshots?
38 >
39 > Really?
40 >
41 > Gentoo devs should at least appreciate the frustration the
42 > gentoo_commoners experience:: since it looks like the only
43 > automated installer we're going to get on gentoo is DYI.... I'm ok
44 > with that but the simplest path (IMHO) is to just start off where
45 > the 2009 installer left off.
46 >
47 >
48 > After all, all the brilliant minds say that it cannot be be or
49 > should not be done (create and automated gentoo installer).....
50 >
51 >
52 > James
53
54 Until Sven updates his code to not use GuideXML, I have linked to his
55 snapshots in my own devspace, under
56 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~jcallen/snapshots/>.
57
58 The snapshots go back to 2008-01-20, and are current to 2015-07-20.
59
60 - --
61 Jonathan Callen
62 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
63 Version: GnuPG v2
64
65 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVxlRSAAoJEEIQbvYRB3mgTZkQAM5uYkuMIb9EETwv2U/AVcij
66 c3VBLrd7pjC0IuN2f3sf4mMKJ7FG712Ixo1tO0Kwxzz0Mxr++99Gt3nk5cqcHkIj
67 tnde8Gr5LeVfExkF78xoVtSaVxtowsr84Ntynn+qgu9SuoFdhS6QtFvlalI5SeYG
68 QASs+Q6ABrcmmE+Uw1hFk3sSzn5M3/VBxsgdxbGQac75CXPz2Kj2sUk7edBNakIa
69 aG5z+pn7m9yxSWRslK/zv/y3E7s26gXXJQNXbOMeG1iY8PW7PQw8PfzZh14RiQGU
70 4LKW7YRCGlLxGW4D5o7XMI4rluMe9MjY/yWPiFx9re0PgxGLHe84nrtxa17Barbv
71 swfrO4OdRTAR6Rl3Pb5RNlI52Ir5AkLA7eiyOgfxioAgaLITRA4qHx72rft4sb+P
72 f97BxdXq4Bpp6sj1hOsqOS2vuYELx+5ijyUNS7yU4tH2QWyjmM7IBRP2AxKREr9x
73 kHHz8bZQ0VIfMmITF3ajpaC8CGhewVXKywWCPzeCfuXpN0C3xr1s0tz64e9Xi1UR
74 tYGI13Lo/89s2Q7DoeAFWU2Y+McMuqwmn4qCAGuRYqqkM3KO5Aqn3Zf7+rliDKs8
75 vvPnhQdB60KezYU74YGOngT6NtbBmsRFiCi1gpjlhi4SIbULWDDLN5mylNzca93H
76 0xb/yMdQv3BejipWNyLk
77 =gdnT
78 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: why --noclear not set on tty1 in default /etc/inittab? James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: why --noclear not set on tty1 in default /etc/inittab? Paul Tobias <tobias.pal@×××××.com>