1 |
On 11/8/06, gentoo-user+help@g.o <gentoo-user+help@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Topics (messages 54428 through 54477): |
3 |
> |
4 |
> [gentoo-user] New install - startx not starting |
5 |
> 54428 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> |
6 |
> |
7 |
> [gentoo-user] [OT]Real compute cycles in a laptop? |
8 |
> 54429 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> [gentoo-user] X starting in 640x480 only |
11 |
> 54430 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> [gentoo-user] ??? ??? |
14 |
> 54431 - Wolfgang Liebich <wolfgang.liebich@×××××××.com> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> [gentoo-user] WinXP under VMWare: no sound |
17 |
> 54432 - Sergio Polini <sp_rm_it@×××××.it> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter |
20 |
> 54433 - Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> [gentoo-user] (EE) AIGLX error |
23 |
> 54435 - Eugene Rosenzweig <eugene259@××××××××××××.net> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> [gentoo-user] imlib2 upgrade an ERROR |
26 |
> 54436 - "Marco Calviani" <marco.calviani@×××××.com> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world |
29 |
> 54437 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
30 |
> 54443 - reader@×××××××.com |
31 |
> |
32 |
> [gentoo-user] New install - startx not starting |
33 |
> 54438 - "Greg Morin" <gpmorin@×××××.com> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> [gentoo-user] sys-apps/kbd-1.12-r8 |
36 |
> 54439 - "Steve [Gentoo]" <gentoo_steve@×××××××.uk> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> [gentoo-user] sys-apps/kbd-1.12-r8 |
39 |
> 54440 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> [gentoo-user] sys-apps/kbd-1.12-r8 |
42 |
> 54441 - Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world |
45 |
> 54442 - Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> |
46 |
> |
47 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world |
48 |
> 54444 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
49 |
> |
50 |
> [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter |
51 |
> 54445 - Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net> |
52 |
> |
53 |
> [gentoo-user] wireless on boot |
54 |
> 54446 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
55 |
> |
56 |
> [gentoo-user] emerge error |
57 |
> 54447 - ??? <stefi@××××××××××××.hu> |
58 |
> |
59 |
> [gentoo-user] emerge error |
60 |
> 54448 - "Hemmann, Volker Armin" |
61 |
> <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> |
62 |
> |
63 |
> [gentoo-user] Kopete plugins dissapeared |
64 |
> 54449 - Rafael Barrera Oro <rafael@××××××××××××××××.ar> |
65 |
> |
66 |
> [gentoo-user] emerge error |
67 |
> 54450 - ??? <stefi@××××××××××××.hu> |
68 |
> |
69 |
> [gentoo-user] emerge error |
70 |
> 54451 - Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> |
71 |
> |
72 |
> [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter |
73 |
> 54452 - Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com> |
74 |
> |
75 |
> [gentoo-user] Kopete plugins dissapeared |
76 |
> 54453 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
77 |
> |
78 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world |
79 |
> 54454 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> |
80 |
> |
81 |
> [gentoo-user] imlib2 upgrade an ERROR |
82 |
> 54455 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> |
83 |
> |
84 |
> [gentoo-user] New install - startx not starting |
85 |
> 54456 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> |
86 |
> |
87 |
> [gentoo-user] emerge error |
88 |
> 54457 - Stefán István <stefi@××××××××××××.hu> |
89 |
> |
90 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
91 |
> 54458 - Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> |
92 |
> |
93 |
> [gentoo-user] WinXP under VMWare: no sound |
94 |
> 54459 - Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de> |
95 |
> |
96 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: OT Good DNS registrar? |
97 |
> 54460 - Jonathan Nichols <jnichols@×××.net> |
98 |
> |
99 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
100 |
> 54461 - Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de> |
101 |
> |
102 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
103 |
> 54462 - "Tim Garton" <garton.tim@×××××.com> |
104 |
> |
105 |
> [gentoo-user] parrot & openoffice failures |
106 |
> 54463 - "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> |
107 |
> |
108 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
109 |
> 54464 - Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> |
110 |
> |
111 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
112 |
> 54465 - Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> |
113 |
> |
114 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
115 |
> 54466 - Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> |
116 |
> |
117 |
> [gentoo-user] [OT]Real compute cycles in a laptop? |
118 |
> 54467 - "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> |
119 |
> |
120 |
> [gentoo-user] switched from SiS to VIA chipset -> vesa framebuffer broken |
121 |
> 54468 - ??? <skoehler@×××.de> |
122 |
> |
123 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
124 |
> 54470 - Mike Williams <mike@××××××××.uk> |
125 |
> |
126 |
> [gentoo-user] X crashes randomly |
127 |
> 54471 - Erik <mistereastenstream@×××××.com> |
128 |
> |
129 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
130 |
> 54472 - "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |
131 |
> |
132 |
> [gentoo-user] iptables error |
133 |
> 54473 - Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de> |
134 |
> |
135 |
> [gentoo-user] WinXP under VMWare: no sound |
136 |
> 54475 - "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |
137 |
> |
138 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: switched from SiS to VIA chipset -> vesa framebuffer |
139 |
> broken |
140 |
> 54476 - ??? <skoehler@×××.de> |
141 |
> |
142 |
> [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter |
143 |
> 54477 - "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |
144 |
> |
145 |
> |
146 |
> |
147 |
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 16:06, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
148 |
> > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 15:00, Mick wrote: |
149 |
> > > > The kernel seems good, I've added 'gpm', and 'xorg-x11'. startx |
150 |
> > > > fails complaining about: |
151 |
> > > > (EE) Failed to load module "radeon" (module does not exist, 0) |
152 |
> > > > (EE) No drivers available. |
153 |
> > > > |
154 |
> > > > My question - how do I get/build this module? |
155 |
> > > |
156 |
> > > Add radeon in your /etc/make.conf under VIDEO_CARDS="radeon" |
157 |
> > |
158 |
> > And then run: |
159 |
> > |
160 |
> > # emerge --newuse -va x11-base/xorg-server |
161 |
> |
162 |
> Hang on a sec, if VIDEO_CARDS is empty or non-existent, doesn't the |
163 |
> ebuild default to building all drivers, like 6.8 did? I never tried |
164 |
> this myself, but I read it in a wiki HOWTO. |
165 |
> |
166 |
> If true, surely Greg's problem would never have happened? |
167 |
> |
168 |
> alan |
169 |
> |
170 |
> -- |
171 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
172 |
> |
173 |
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 05:18, Mark Knecht wrote: |
174 |
> > Hi, |
175 |
> > I'm in the market for a new laptop. I sold mine about a year ago |
176 |
> > and it's time to get a new one. I will run both Linux and Win XP on |
177 |
> > the machine. The Linux workload will not be anything substantial but |
178 |
> > when in Win XP I have a program that I'll be running that is very |
179 |
> > compute bound on my only XP desktop machine. |
180 |
> > |
181 |
> > Does anyone know of good comparative data on BogoMIPs in Linux vs. |
182 |
> > real compute speed for different processors? I'm looking for some way |
183 |
> > to compare different processors in the laptops I'm looking at vs. my |
184 |
> > current XP desktop which is my slowest machine. |
185 |
> > |
186 |
> > The application under Windows is doing neural network stuff. I |
187 |
> > have no idea how much of it is floating point based but my assumption |
188 |
> > is that is a pretty big part of the whole picture. Is the AMD FPU |
189 |
> > still superior to the Intel FPU or are they at parity these days? |
190 |
> > |
191 |
> > The current machine has 768MB. The application never uses more |
192 |
> > than 256MB and there is no significant disk I/O but the processor |
193 |
> > sits at 100% in XP for hours doing it's work optimizing the neural |
194 |
> > network. |
195 |
> |
196 |
> You seem to know enough about these matters already to make a sane |
197 |
> judgement, so you probably already know that the real answer to your |
198 |
> question is "it depends". |
199 |
> |
200 |
> Here's what I would do: pop along to your local store, preferably not |
201 |
> one of the big chains, find the sanest sales guy with a clue and |
202 |
> explain your problem. Don't listen to his recommendations, just ask if |
203 |
> you can test his demo machines with the actual app in question. If it's |
204 |
> an owner run store he probably say yes. Then test the thing for real |
205 |
> and measure progress after 30 minutes or so. Buy the best performer. |
206 |
> |
207 |
> This will take a while, but at least you'll know for real which one |
208 |
> suits your needs best |
209 |
> |
210 |
> alan |
211 |
> -- |
212 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
213 |
> |
214 |
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 20:37, Christian Herzyk wrote: |
215 |
> > Any idea what the problem is? |
216 |
> |
217 |
> Please post your xorg.conf |
218 |
> |
219 |
> alan |
220 |
> -- |
221 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
222 |
> |
223 |
> Hi, |
224 |
> Ich habe in meinem Büro einen neuen PC bekommen und ihn mit gentoo |
225 |
> aufgesetzt, so wie den alten. ABER: |
226 |
> Wenn ich auf meinem neuen PC versuche, via rdesktop zu irgendeinem |
227 |
> Windows-Rechner zu gelangen, bekomme ich nur obige Fehlermeldung. Auf |
228 |
> dem *alten* System klappt es - es ist auf beiden Systemen die gleiche |
229 |
> Version installiert |
230 |
> (eix -I rdesktop sagt |
231 |
> * net-misc/rdesktop |
232 |
> Available versions: 1.4.1 ~1.5.0 ~1.5.0-r1 |
233 |
> Installed: 1.4.1 |
234 |
> Homepage: http://rdesktop.sourceforge.net/ |
235 |
> Description: A Remote Desktop Protocol Client |
236 |
> ), die gleichen USE-Flags ( equery uses sagt: |
237 |
> $equery uses rdesktop |
238 |
> [ Searching for packages matching rdesktop... ] |
239 |
> [ Colour Code : set unset ] |
240 |
> [ Legend : Left column (U) - USE flags from |
241 |
> make.conf ] |
242 |
> [ : Right column (I) - USE flags packages was installed |
243 |
> with ] |
244 |
> [ Found these USE variables for net-misc/rdesktop-1.4.1 ] |
245 |
> U I |
246 |
> - - debug : Tells configure and the makefiles to build for debugging. |
247 |
> Effects vary across packages, but generally it will at least add -g to |
248 |
> CFLAGS. Remember to set FEATURES=nostrip too |
249 |
> - - ipv6 : Adds support for IP version 6 |
250 |
> - - oss : Adds support for OSS (Open Sound System) |
251 |
> ), also ... was kann das sein??? Es kommt kein Fenster, es geht einfach |
252 |
> nur nicht ... bizarr! |
253 |
> Verwirrt in Wien, |
254 |
> Wolfgang Liebich |
255 |
> -- |
256 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
257 |
> |
258 |
> Richard Fish: |
259 |
> > > [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object |
260 |
> '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so' |
261 |
> > > from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored. |
262 |
> > |
263 |
> > What are the permissions on this? |
264 |
> |
265 |
> a) |
266 |
> ls -l /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so.0.0.0 -> |
267 |
> -rwxr-xr-x |
268 |
> |
269 |
> [sp ~]$ aoss32 vmware & |
270 |
> [1] 5409 |
271 |
> [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object |
272 |
> '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so' from |
273 |
> LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored. |
274 |
> (five times) |
275 |
> |
276 |
> testing ~ # aoss32 vmware & |
277 |
> [1] 5439 |
278 |
> testing lib # ERROR: ld.so: |
279 |
> object '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so' from LD_PRELOAD |
280 |
> cannot be |
281 |
> preloaded: ignored. |
282 |
> (five times) |
283 |
> |
284 |
> b) |
285 |
> chmod +s libaoss.so.0.0.0 |
286 |
> ls -l /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so.0.0.0 -> |
287 |
> -rwsr-sr-x |
288 |
> |
289 |
> [sp ~]$ aoss32 vmware & |
290 |
> [1] 5462 |
291 |
> [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object |
292 |
> '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so' from |
293 |
> LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored. |
294 |
> (five times) |
295 |
> |
296 |
> testing lib # aoss32 vmware & |
297 |
> [1] 5480 |
298 |
> testing ~ # ERROR: ld.so: object |
299 |
> '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so' |
300 |
> from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored. |
301 |
> (five times) |
302 |
> |
303 |
> But: |
304 |
> |
305 |
> testing ~ # aoss vmware & |
306 |
> [1] 5515 |
307 |
> (sound works) |
308 |
> |
309 |
> [sp ~]$ aoss vmware & |
310 |
> [2] 5598 |
311 |
> [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object 'libaoss.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be |
312 |
> preloaded: ignored. |
313 |
> |
314 |
> Sergio |
315 |
> -- |
316 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
317 |
> |
318 |
> Dale wrote: |
319 |
> > Hi, |
320 |
> > |
321 |
> > I have noticed that some people on this list get marked as spam. I |
322 |
> > think I hit the spam button a few times by mistake and it seems |
323 |
> > Seamonkey remembers this very well. Is there a file that I can edit or |
324 |
> > delete to "reset" this? Sort of give me a fresh start. |
325 |
> > |
326 |
> > |
327 |
> >> [I--] [ ] www-client/seamonkey-1.0.5 (0) |
328 |
> >> |
329 |
> > |
330 |
> > |
331 |
> > Thanks |
332 |
> > |
333 |
> > Dale |
334 |
> > |
335 |
> > :-) :-) |
336 |
> > |
337 |
> |
338 |
> |
339 |
> When such a false positive arrives you could click "the spam button" |
340 |
> again (its tooltip should say "mark as not junk") this should fix the |
341 |
> problem. |
342 |
> |
343 |
> -- |
344 |
> Best regards, |
345 |
> Daniel |
346 |
> |
347 |
> |
348 |
> -- |
349 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
350 |
> |
351 |
> Turi Tropea wrote: |
352 |
> > hi people |
353 |
> > |
354 |
> > i have this in my /var/log/Xorg.0.log |
355 |
> > |
356 |
> > (EE) AIGLX error: dlsym for __driCreateNewScreen_20050727 failed |
357 |
> > (/usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so: undefined symbol: |
358 |
> > __driCreateNewScreen_20050727) |
359 |
> > |
360 |
> > (i have the USE aiglx in my make.conf) |
361 |
> > |
362 |
> > how i can resolve this Error? |
363 |
> > |
364 |
> > thanks and have a nice day |
365 |
> > |
366 |
> I have the same error here. I googled for it and found some info that |
367 |
> the way to avoid this is to turn off AIGLX: |
368 |
> |
369 |
> Section "ServerFlags" |
370 |
> Option "AIGLX" "off" |
371 |
> EndSection |
372 |
> |
373 |
> The link I am looking at now |
374 |
> (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=1697767) also |
375 |
> suggests: |
376 |
> |
377 |
> Section "Extensions" |
378 |
> Option "Composite" "0" |
379 |
> EndSection |
380 |
> |
381 |
> to disable composite extension... |
382 |
> |
383 |
> Well, I put those info my xorg and nothing happened at all... Unless |
384 |
> there is some really basic error I missed, it just doesnt work for me... |
385 |
> You are welcome to try these. |
386 |
> |
387 |
> Eugene. |
388 |
> -- |
389 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
390 |
> |
391 |
> Hi list, |
392 |
> when trying to do an emerge world, the system tries to upgrade to |
393 |
> imlib2-1.3.0 from version 1.2(something). But during the configure |
394 |
> step, it comes to this error: |
395 |
> |
396 |
> [......] |
397 |
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar |
398 |
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib |
399 |
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip... i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip |
400 |
> checking for correct ltmain.sh version... no |
401 |
> configure: error: |
402 |
> |
403 |
> *** [Gentoo] sanity check failed! *** |
404 |
> *** libtool.m4 and ltmain.sh have a version mismatch! *** |
405 |
> *** (libtool.m4 = 1.5.22, ltmain.sh = "1.5.22 Debian 1.5.22-4") *** |
406 |
> |
407 |
> Please run: |
408 |
> |
409 |
> libtoolize --copy --force |
410 |
> |
411 |
> if appropriate, please contact the maintainer of this |
412 |
> package (or your distribution) for help. |
413 |
> |
414 |
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1 |
415 |
> |
416 |
> !!! ERROR: media-libs/imlib2-1.3.0 failed. |
417 |
> Call stack: |
418 |
> ebuild.sh, line 1546: Called dyn_compile |
419 |
> ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile |
420 |
> imlib2-1.3.0.ebuild, line 52: Called enlightenment_src_compile |
421 |
> enlightenment.eclass, line 150: Called enlightenment_die 'emake failed' |
422 |
> enlightenment.eclass, line 102: Called die |
423 |
> |
424 |
> !!! emake failed |
425 |
> !!! SEND BUG REPORTS TO vapier@g.o NOT THE E TEAM |
426 |
> !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call |
427 |
> stack if relevant. |
428 |
> |
429 |
> Is this a known error? |
430 |
> Regards, |
431 |
> mc |
432 |
> -- |
433 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
434 |
> |
435 |
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:55:55 -0600, reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
436 |
> |
437 |
> > > Yes, meaningless; update world means the packages on YOUR machine, |
438 |
> > > matching YOUR arch and dependencies requires by YOUR use flags have |
439 |
> > > been changed. No one can relate to that without knowing all those |
440 |
> > > settings, or a simple list of the packages updated with "genlop |
441 |
> > > --list --date yesterday" |
442 |
> > > |
443 |
> > |
444 |
> > Your repeating it ever louder does not make it so. |
445 |
> |
446 |
> Correct, it was already so. |
447 |
> |
448 |
> > update world |
449 |
> > conveys a major update of the entire OS, |
450 |
> |
451 |
> No it doesn't. It updates whatever has been updated since you last ran |
452 |
> it. This depends on the arch and USE flags you have, which packages |
453 |
> you have installed and when you last did it. it could update two packages |
454 |
> or two hundred. The point is, the statement gives no indication of which |
455 |
> packages you have upgraded, so it is of no real help in diagnosing your |
456 |
> problem. |
457 |
> |
458 |
> > then follows a very specific |
459 |
> > error that I hoped someone would be able to identify. |
460 |
> |
461 |
> Which I did, and proposed a solution. It didn't work because I assumed |
462 |
> you were using the split KDE ebuilds, a list of the packages you had |
463 |
> updated would have shown otherwise and enabled me to give the answer I |
464 |
> gave later in my first reply. |
465 |
> |
466 |
> When asking for help, it is difficult to give too much information but |
467 |
> all to easy to give too little. |
468 |
> |
469 |
> > Your continued insistance on |
470 |
> > this appears to be more about opinion than fact. |
471 |
> |
472 |
> No, it's about asking for the information needed to make a diagnosis. |
473 |
> |
474 |
> > > You're running the monolithic KDE ebuilds, so re-emerge kdebase. |
475 |
> > > Incidentally, this is one of the situations where the split ebuilds |
476 |
> > > really pay off, as you'd only have to recompile Konqueror rather than |
477 |
> > > all the core KDE programs. |
478 |
> > |
479 |
> > Thanks, I'll be doing that. |
480 |
> |
481 |
> See, once you gave details about specific packages involved, it |
482 |
> was easier to provide advice. Remote diagnosis usually involves some |
483 |
> guessing as to the correct answer, don't make us guess the question too. |
484 |
> |
485 |
> You seem to have taken this as a personal attack, it was not. If you want |
486 |
> people to be able to help you, give them what they need. My first |
487 |
> response was simply some advice on one way doing this that "update world" |
488 |
> does not achieve. You were not the first to fall into this trap; you will |
489 |
> not be the last, but my discussing it I hope it may happen less often. |
490 |
> |
491 |
> |
492 |
> -- |
493 |
> Neil Bothwick |
494 |
> |
495 |
> I'd prefer the non-smoking lifeboat, please. |
496 |
> |
497 |
> |
498 |
> VIDEO_CARDS was/is set. The tweaking was in USE - 'png' was necessary before |
499 |
> 'emerge cario'. |
500 |
> |
501 |
> Gpm |
502 |
> |
503 |
> |
504 |
> On 11/7/06, Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> wrote: |
505 |
> > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 16:06, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
506 |
> > > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 15:00, Mick wrote: |
507 |
> > > > > The kernel seems good, I've added 'gpm', and 'xorg-x11'. startx |
508 |
> > > > > fails complaining about: |
509 |
> > > > > (EE) Failed to load module "radeon" (module does not exist, 0) |
510 |
> > > > > (EE) No drivers available. |
511 |
> > > > > |
512 |
> > > > > My question - how do I get/build this module? |
513 |
> > > > |
514 |
> > > > Add radeon in your /etc/make.conf under VIDEO_CARDS="radeon" |
515 |
> > > |
516 |
> > > And then run: |
517 |
> > > |
518 |
> > > # emerge --newuse -va x11-base/xorg-server |
519 |
> > |
520 |
> > Hang on a sec, if VIDEO_CARDS is empty or non-existent, doesn't the |
521 |
> > ebuild default to building all drivers, like 6.8 did? I never tried |
522 |
> > this myself, but I read it in a wiki HOWTO. |
523 |
> > |
524 |
> > If true, surely Greg's problem would never have happened? |
525 |
> > |
526 |
> > alan |
527 |
> > |
528 |
> > -- |
529 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
530 |
> > |
531 |
> > |
532 |
> |
533 |
> |
534 |
> |
535 |
> -- |
536 |
> |
537 |
> Gpm |
538 |
> The Morins of Plantsville |
539 |
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
540 |
> > If you look at the configure script you will see that it's is testing if |
541 |
> you |
542 |
> > are on a sparc64. The test shows you aren't which appears to be unrelated |
543 |
> to |
544 |
> > your problem. Line 153 which appears to be failing is this: |
545 |
> > |
546 |
> > echo "ARCH=${TARGET_ARCH/i?86/i386}" >> make_include |
547 |
> > |
548 |
> > which is supposed to substitute i686 with i386 in your case and store it |
549 |
> in |
550 |
> > make_include as "ARCH=i386". I have no clue why that would fail. The only |
551 |
> > thing that I can think of is to remerge your shell (probably |
552 |
> > app-shells/bash). If noone else has a clue and that doesn't help I guess |
553 |
> your |
554 |
> > best option is to file a bug with the info you've posted now... |
555 |
> Thanks for your help, and while it might not have been obvious to you |
556 |
> (or anyone else reading along)... everything that was confusing before |
557 |
> is clear now... to me at least. While I can see what is wrong, it isn't |
558 |
> 100% clear if it constitutes a bug or not. |
559 |
> |
560 |
> The problem is that the configure script starts '#!/bin/sh' - but goes |
561 |
> on to depend upon Bash specific features... specifically substitution. |
562 |
> I expect this would not be a problem for most users where /bin/sh is a |
563 |
> sym-link to /bin/bash.... but, for me, /bin/sh was a sym-link to |
564 |
> /bin/ash... and, for that shell, line 151 is invalid. What is less |
565 |
> clear is whether or not, in a Gentoo context, it is 'correct' to have |
566 |
> /bin/sh being Borne-like but not Bash-like. By preference I'd prefer |
567 |
> /bin/sh to be the minimal shell that will execute Borne-shell scripts... |
568 |
> but I recognise the Linux-world normality of /bin/sh actually being bash. |
569 |
> |
570 |
> As at-least a temporary fix I replaced my /bin/sh->/bin/ash with a |
571 |
> /bin/sh->/bin/bash... and everything now emerges smoothly... From a |
572 |
> prissy perspective I'd have hoped that the configure script would |
573 |
> specify that it needed bash functionality by demanding evaluation by |
574 |
> bash instead of whatever /bin/sh happens to be... |
575 |
> |
576 |
> Thanks again, |
577 |
> |
578 |
> Steve |
579 |
> |
580 |
> |
581 |
> |
582 |
> -- |
583 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
584 |
> |
585 |
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:44:31 +0000, Steve [Gentoo] wrote: |
586 |
> |
587 |
> > The problem is that the configure script starts '#!/bin/sh' - but goes |
588 |
> > on to depend upon Bash specific features... specifically substitution. |
589 |
> > I expect this would not be a problem for most users where /bin/sh is a |
590 |
> > sym-link to /bin/bash.... but, for me, /bin/sh was a sym-link to |
591 |
> > /bin/ash... and, for that shell, line 151 is invalid. What is less |
592 |
> > clear is whether or not, in a Gentoo context, it is 'correct' to have |
593 |
> > /bin/sh being Borne-like but not Bash-like. By preference I'd prefer |
594 |
> > /bin/sh to be the minimal shell that will execute Borne-shell scripts... |
595 |
> > but I recognise the Linux-world normality of /bin/sh actually being |
596 |
> > bash. |
597 |
> |
598 |
> Bash behaves differently when called as sh, to avoid just this sort of |
599 |
> problem. However, if the script calls /bin/sh while requiring bash |
600 |
> features it is clearly broken and a bug should be files. |
601 |
> |
602 |
> Unfortunately, this type of breakage is all too common; I tried using |
603 |
> dash as /bin/sh for a short while and found all sorts of things falling |
604 |
> over. In this case, it can be easily fixed, by the ebuild altering the |
605 |
> shebang line of configure before running it. |
606 |
> |
607 |
> |
608 |
> -- |
609 |
> Neil Bothwick |
610 |
> |
611 |
> Psychiatrists say that 1 of 4 people are mentally ill. |
612 |
> |
613 |
> |
614 |
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:44, Steve [Gentoo] wrote: |
615 |
> > Thanks for your help, and while it might not have been obvious to you |
616 |
> > (or anyone else reading along)... everything that was confusing before |
617 |
> > is clear now... to me at least. While I can see what is wrong, it isn't |
618 |
> > 100% clear if it constitutes a bug or not. |
619 |
> > |
620 |
> > The problem is that the configure script starts '#!/bin/sh' - but goes |
621 |
> > on to depend upon Bash specific features... specifically substitution. |
622 |
> > I expect this would not be a problem for most users where /bin/sh is a |
623 |
> > sym-link to /bin/bash.... but, for me, /bin/sh was a sym-link to |
624 |
> > /bin/ash... and, for that shell, line 151 is invalid. |
625 |
> |
626 |
> Heh, I just hadn't noticed that the first line of the script said /bin/sh. |
627 |
> That's definitely a bug. Either the script must be modified to only |
628 |
> use /bin/sh features or it must request a shell that supports it... |
629 |
> |
630 |
> -- |
631 |
> Bo Andresen |
632 |
> |
633 |
> |
634 |
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 04:55, reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
635 |
> > Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> writes: |
636 |
> > [...] |
637 |
> > |
638 |
> > >> I'd hoped someone would have had the same or similar situation and |
639 |
> > >> error before posted piles of data... so no not meaningless. |
640 |
> > > |
641 |
> > > Yes, meaningless; update world means the packages on YOUR machine, |
642 |
> > > matching YOUR arch and dependencies requires by YOUR use flags have been |
643 |
> > > changed. No one can relate to that without knowing all those settings, |
644 |
> or |
645 |
> > > a simple list of the packages updated with "genlop --list --date |
646 |
> > > yesterday" |
647 |
> > |
648 |
> > Your repeating it ever louder does not make it so. update world |
649 |
> > conveys a major update of the entire OS, then follows a very specific |
650 |
> > error that I hoped someone would be able to identify. |
651 |
> > |
652 |
> > So no not meaningless, |
653 |
> > |
654 |
> > Were it actually meaningless no one would have been able to help. |
655 |
> > I was glad to supply any needed details. Your continued insistance on |
656 |
> > this appears to be more about opinion than fact. |
657 |
> |
658 |
> The fact that we may sometimes be able to guess based on the error message |
659 |
> doesn't change the fact that saying you upgraded some packages without |
660 |
> stating which packages is entirely meaningless. If you would refuse to tell |
661 |
> us which then you might as well leave out the fact that you upgraded |
662 |
> anything. But it definitely is a lot easier if you just provided the output |
663 |
> of e.g. "genlop --list --date yesterday" as mentioned by Neil. Also the |
664 |
> purpose of Neil and I stating this isn't to make you or anyone else look bad |
665 |
> but rather to make it easier for everyone in the future... |
666 |
> |
667 |
> -- |
668 |
> Bo Andresen |
669 |
> |
670 |
> |
671 |
> Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> writes: |
672 |
> |
673 |
> > No it doesn't. It updates whatever has been updated since you last ran |
674 |
> > it. This depends on the arch and USE flags you have, which packages |
675 |
> > you have installed and when you last did it. it could update two packages |
676 |
> > or two hundred. The point is, the statement gives no indication of which |
677 |
> > packages you have upgraded, so it is of no real help in diagnosing your |
678 |
> > problem. |
679 |
> |
680 |
> Here is meaningless: |
681 |
> |
682 |
> Konqueror errored out with this message "bla bla". |
683 |
> What does it mean? |
684 |
> |
685 |
> What I gave was considerably more. |
686 |
> |
687 |
> OS update |
688 |
> Konqueror errors out "bla bla". Any one know what it means. |
689 |
> |
690 |
> Lets see, OS update, the guy's running kde... we have specific |
691 |
> library error. |
692 |
> |
693 |
> Maybe not so hard for someone who knows enough to make a connection |
694 |
> there. |
695 |
> |
696 |
> Feigning surprise that your `meaningless' phrase was taken as some |
697 |
> kind of (light) attack is also pretty phony. |
698 |
> |
699 |
> One does not liken something that was enough to point out a specific |
700 |
> problem as `meaningless' without somekind of ill intent or at least a |
701 |
> certain high handedness of language. |
702 |
> |
703 |
> So drop the surprise charade and just let this fade away. |
704 |
> |
705 |
> If you need more information just say so. No gimmick required. |
706 |
> |
707 |
> Once again, thanks for your input. |
708 |
> |
709 |
> -- |
710 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
711 |
> |
712 |
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:01:52 -0600, reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
713 |
> |
714 |
> This is getting silly, and all because I tried to help you. Maybe there's |
715 |
> a lesson to be learned. |
716 |
> |
717 |
> > Here is meaningless: |
718 |
> > |
719 |
> > Konqueror errored out with this message "bla bla". |
720 |
> > What does it mean? |
721 |
> > |
722 |
> > What I gave was considerably more. |
723 |
> > |
724 |
> > OS update |
725 |
> > Konqueror errors out "bla bla". Any one know what it means. |
726 |
> > |
727 |
> > Lets see, OS update, the guy's running kde... we have specific |
728 |
> > library error. |
729 |
> |
730 |
> But we don't know what changed on your system to cause that error, |
731 |
> because you didn't tell us which packages you upgraded. Note that I did |
732 |
> not call this statement meaningless but the comment about an update |
733 |
> world. Look at my original post again, I edited it so that that comment |
734 |
> only applied to a single statement, the error message was referenced |
735 |
> later. |
736 |
> |
737 |
> > One does not liken something that was enough to point out a specific |
738 |
> > problem as `meaningless' without somekind of ill intent or at least a |
739 |
> > certain high handedness of language. |
740 |
> |
741 |
> You really don't get it do you? Try reading the thread again, you gave |
742 |
> absolutely no indication of which packages were updated. Try looking up |
743 |
> meaningless in a dictionary - stating that you did a world update without |
744 |
> any context does indeed make that statement without meaning. |
745 |
> |
746 |
> > So drop the surprise charade and just let this fade away. |
747 |
> |
748 |
> Grow up! |
749 |
> |
750 |
> > If you need more information just say so. No gimmick required. |
751 |
> |
752 |
> I don't need anything from you. You are the one with the problem, I was |
753 |
> trying to help you find a solution. |
754 |
> |
755 |
> > Once again, thanks for your input. |
756 |
> |
757 |
> Why? You have ignored everything I said to try to diagnose and fix the |
758 |
> problem and focused entirely on a perceived insult from a comment that |
759 |
> one statement in your original question provided no useful information; |
760 |
> even though it also contained an explanation of why this was so and |
761 |
> guidance on how to provide that information. I wish I hadn't bothered and |
762 |
> had concentrated on the questions I am paid to answer. |
763 |
> |
764 |
> |
765 |
> -- |
766 |
> Neil Bothwick |
767 |
> |
768 |
> Always be sincere... whether you mean it or not! |
769 |
> |
770 |
> |
771 |
> |
772 |
> Daniel Iliev wrote: |
773 |
> |
774 |
> |
775 |
> When such a false positive arrives you could click "the spam button" |
776 |
> again (its tooltip should say "mark as not junk") this should fix the |
777 |
> problem. |
778 |
> |
779 |
> |
780 |
> |
781 |
> I have been doing that for some time now and it still marks them as spam. |
782 |
> It is not always the same people but certain ones do get picked on a lot. |
783 |
> It seems to get it by subject too I guess. |
784 |
> |
785 |
> Any ideas where this info is kept? I thought of unmerging and then |
786 |
> cleaning out the directory and emerging it again. I'm not sure that will |
787 |
> work either though. |
788 |
> |
789 |
> Dale |
790 |
> |
791 |
> :-) :-) |
792 |
> |
793 |
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 19:35, Luigi Pinna wrote: |
794 |
> |
795 |
> > Alle 20:44, sabato 4 novembre 2006, Neil Bothwick ha scritto: |
796 |
> > > On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 13:53:39 +0100, Luigi Pinna wrote: |
797 |
> > > > But I continue to have some problems... |
798 |
> > > > First, on boot time net.eth0 gives up and I must wait until timeout |
799 |
> > > > before that boot could continue. |
800 |
> > > |
801 |
> > > emerge ifplugd and read the comments about it in |
802 |
> > > /etc/conf.d/net.example |
803 |
> > |
804 |
> > Sorry I answer only now: I was not here! |
805 |
> > Your command works good, now in boot time I don't wait about net.eth0 |
806 |
> > but net.wlan0 and net.eth0 seem not active, but the wireless works. |
807 |
> > I found that my connection is not still stable. |
808 |
> |
809 |
> I'm not sure but it may have something to do with TTL and MTU sizes being |
810 |
> different between your wireless router and your computer wifi card? |
811 |
> |
812 |
> > dmesg is full from this kind of messagges: |
813 |
> > zd1211:Mixed Mode |
814 |
> |
815 |
> Assuming that is your zd1211 is your wireless card device I would comment |
816 |
> out |
817 |
> the mixed and infrastructure mode settings from the /etc/conf.d/net file to |
818 |
> see if it makes a difference. |
819 |
> |
820 |
> If you still cannot find what's causing it I would suggest that you |
821 |
> establish |
822 |
> a basic connection to the router without passwd authentication, or anything |
823 |
> clever and see if that holds the connection. If the connection failures |
824 |
> continue, then it may have to do with a hardware problem. If the connection |
825 |
> failures go away, then it is a configuration issue. |
826 |
> |
827 |
> HTH. |
828 |
> -- |
829 |
> Regards, |
830 |
> Mick |
831 |
> |
832 |
> |
833 |
> Hi! |
834 |
> I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is |
835 |
> finished: |
836 |
> |
837 |
> >>> Source compiled. |
838 |
> --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY |
839 |
> --------------------------- |
840 |
> LOG FILE = |
841 |
> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log" |
842 |
> |
843 |
> access_wr: / |
844 |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
845 |
> |
846 |
> What does this mean? |
847 |
> |
848 |
> Thanks, |
849 |
> István |
850 |
> |
851 |
> -- |
852 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
853 |
> |
854 |
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote: |
855 |
> > Hi! |
856 |
> > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is |
857 |
> > |
858 |
> > finished: |
859 |
> > >>> Source compiled. |
860 |
> > |
861 |
> > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY |
862 |
> > --------------------------- |
863 |
> > LOG FILE = |
864 |
> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log" |
865 |
> > |
866 |
> > access_wr: / |
867 |
> > |
868 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
869 |
> >----- |
870 |
> > |
871 |
> > What does this mean? |
872 |
> > |
873 |
> > Thanks, |
874 |
> > István |
875 |
> |
876 |
> as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried to write outside of the sandbox |
877 |
> and |
878 |
> got stopped. Read the log. Usually that means that something is broken. Try |
879 |
> a |
880 |
> different pgp version - and don't disable sandbox. Disabling sanbox is evil. |
881 |
> |
882 |
> -- |
883 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
884 |
> |
885 |
> Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: |
886 |
> |
887 |
> >On Monday 06 November 2006 23:22, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: |
888 |
> > |
889 |
> > |
890 |
> >>Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: |
891 |
> >> |
892 |
> >> |
893 |
> >>>On Monday 06 November 2006 22:33, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: |
894 |
> >>> |
895 |
> >>> |
896 |
> >>>>I recently emerged modular kde, and along with the coming of kopete |
897 |
> >>>>0.12.3 all the plugins dissapeared except for the Cryptography plugin, |
898 |
> >>>>does anyone now something about this? should i just re emerge it? |
899 |
> >>>> |
900 |
> >>>>Thanks in advance! |
901 |
> >>>> |
902 |
> >>>>Rafael |
903 |
> >>>> |
904 |
> >>>> |
905 |
> >>>You'll have to enable the ones you want via USE flags. |
906 |
> >>> |
907 |
> >>> |
908 |
> >>One flag per each plugin? I am mainly interested in the history plugin |
909 |
> >>do you know which flag i need? where i can find a list of kopete flags? |
910 |
> >> |
911 |
> >>Thanks for your reply |
912 |
> >> |
913 |
> >> |
914 |
> > |
915 |
> >emerge -pv kde-base/kopete |
916 |
> > |
917 |
> >The history plugin is enabled with the 'history' USE flag. |
918 |
> > |
919 |
> > |
920 |
> > |
921 |
> Sorry for taking so long, just wanted to say it all worked perfectly |
922 |
> except for the jingle flag which prevented kopete to build properly, i |
923 |
> was not interested in such plugin though and got what i wanted anyway, |
924 |
> thanks for your help |
925 |
> -- |
926 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
927 |
> |
928 |
> szerda 08 november 2006 15.18 dátummal Hemmann, Volker Armin ezt írta: |
929 |
> > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote: |
930 |
> > > Hi! |
931 |
> > > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is |
932 |
> > > |
933 |
> > > finished: |
934 |
> > > >>> Source compiled. |
935 |
> > > |
936 |
> > > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY |
937 |
> > > --------------------------- |
938 |
> > > LOG FILE = |
939 |
> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log" |
940 |
> > > |
941 |
> > > access_wr: / |
942 |
> > > |
943 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
944 |
> > >----- |
945 |
> > > |
946 |
> > > What does this mean? |
947 |
> > > |
948 |
> > > Thanks, |
949 |
> > > István |
950 |
> > |
951 |
> > as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried to write outside of the sandbox |
952 |
> and |
953 |
> > got stopped. Read the log. Usually that means that something is broken. |
954 |
> Try |
955 |
> a |
956 |
> > different pgp version - and don't disable sandbox. Disabling sanbox is |
957 |
> evil. |
958 |
> |
959 |
> To tell the thruth, I don't know what sandbox is. I hasn't disabled it, or |
960 |
> at |
961 |
> least I don't know about it. |
962 |
> |
963 |
> The log says only: access_wr: / |
964 |
> |
965 |
> István |
966 |
> |
967 |
> -- |
968 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
969 |
> |
970 |
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:18, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
971 |
> > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote: |
972 |
> > > Hi! |
973 |
> > > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is |
974 |
> > > |
975 |
> > > finished: |
976 |
> > > >>> Source compiled. |
977 |
> > > |
978 |
> > > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY |
979 |
> > > --------------------------- |
980 |
> > > LOG FILE = |
981 |
> > > |
982 |
> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log" |
983 |
> > > |
984 |
> > > access_wr: / |
985 |
> > > |
986 |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
987 |
> > >-- ----- |
988 |
> > > |
989 |
> > > What does this mean? |
990 |
> > > |
991 |
> > > Thanks, |
992 |
> > > István |
993 |
> > |
994 |
> > as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried to write outside of the sandbox |
995 |
> > and got stopped. Read the log. Usually that means that something is |
996 |
> broken. |
997 |
> > Try a different pgp version - and don't disable sandbox. Disabling sanbox |
998 |
> > is evil. |
999 |
> |
1000 |
> Actually the most likely cause is bug #101433 [1]. Which means he needs to |
1001 |
> upgrade his sandbox: |
1002 |
> |
1003 |
> # FEATURES=-sandbox emerge --oneshot sandbox |
1004 |
> |
1005 |
> After that he should have no issues with emerging gnupg without disabling |
1006 |
> sandbox. |
1007 |
> |
1008 |
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101433 |
1009 |
> |
1010 |
> -- |
1011 |
> Bo Andresen |
1012 |
> |
1013 |
> |
1014 |
> Dale wrote: |
1015 |
> > Daniel Iliev wrote: |
1016 |
> >> |
1017 |
> >> |
1018 |
> >> When such a false positive arrives you could click "the spam button" |
1019 |
> >> again (its tooltip should say "mark as not junk") this should fix the |
1020 |
> >> problem. |
1021 |
> >> |
1022 |
> >> |
1023 |
> > |
1024 |
> > I have been doing that for some time now and it still marks them as |
1025 |
> > spam. It is not always the same people but certain ones do get picked |
1026 |
> > on a lot. It seems to get it by subject too I guess. |
1027 |
> > |
1028 |
> > Any ideas where this info is kept? I thought of unmerging and then |
1029 |
> > cleaning out the directory and emerging it again. I'm not sure that |
1030 |
> > will work either though. |
1031 |
> > |
1032 |
> > Dale |
1033 |
> > |
1034 |
> > :-) :-) |
1035 |
> |
1036 |
> |
1037 |
> If you are ready to delete all your settings un-merging won't be needed. |
1038 |
> Just close seamonkey and move/delete your mozilla-home folder. The next |
1039 |
> time you start seamonkey it would appear as if it was just installed. |
1040 |
> |
1041 |
> for example: |
1042 |
> mv ~/.mozilla ~/MOZILLA-BACK |
1043 |
> |
1044 |
> |
1045 |
> |
1046 |
> -- |
1047 |
> Best regards, |
1048 |
> Daniel |
1049 |
> |
1050 |
> |
1051 |
> -- |
1052 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1053 |
> |
1054 |
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:21:54 +0000, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: |
1055 |
> |
1056 |
> > Sorry for taking so long, just wanted to say it all worked perfectly |
1057 |
> > except for the jingle flag which prevented kopete to build properly, i |
1058 |
> > was not interested in such plugin though and got what i wanted anyway, |
1059 |
> > thanks for your help |
1060 |
> |
1061 |
> jingle apparently works as long as you do not have kdeenablefinal in USE. |
1062 |
> |
1063 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151089 |
1064 |
> |
1065 |
> |
1066 |
> -- |
1067 |
> Neil Bothwick |
1068 |
> |
1069 |
> Deja Moo: The feeling that you heard this bull somewhere before. |
1070 |
> |
1071 |
> |
1072 |
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 14:01, reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
1073 |
> > > No it doesn't. It updates whatever has been updated since you last |
1074 |
> > > ran it. This depends on the arch and USE flags you have, which |
1075 |
> > > packages you have installed and when you last did it. it could |
1076 |
> > > update two packages or two hundred. The point is, the statement |
1077 |
> > > gives no indication of which packages you have upgraded, so it is |
1078 |
> > > of no real help in diagnosing your problem. |
1079 |
> > |
1080 |
> > Here is meaningless: |
1081 |
> |
1082 |
> Reader, stop acting like a spoilt brat who needs to have the last say. I |
1083 |
> really don't care how you define "meaningless", but your prattling on |
1084 |
> about it, defending yourself, making yourself right and Neil wrong is |
1085 |
> getting tiresome. Here's the real dope: |
1086 |
> |
1087 |
> You gave what you thought was useful information. |
1088 |
> As it turns out, it wasn't. It's just fluff. |
1089 |
> Neil told you it was fluff and he told you why. |
1090 |
> Neil is trying to help you, he hasn't sent you an invoice for his time |
1091 |
> and he's within his rights to tell you what format he wants information |
1092 |
> in so he can continue to give you this free advice. |
1093 |
> |
1094 |
> Dude, it happens. Get over it. |
1095 |
> |
1096 |
> alan |
1097 |
> -- |
1098 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1099 |
> |
1100 |
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 10:18, Marco Calviani wrote: |
1101 |
> > Hi list, |
1102 |
> > when trying to do an emerge world, the system tries to upgrade to |
1103 |
> > imlib2-1.3.0 from version 1.2(something). But during the configure |
1104 |
> > step, it comes to this error: |
1105 |
> > |
1106 |
> > [......] |
1107 |
> > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar |
1108 |
> > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib |
1109 |
> > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip... i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip |
1110 |
> > checking for correct ltmain.sh version... no |
1111 |
> > configure: error: |
1112 |
> > |
1113 |
> > *** [Gentoo] sanity check failed! *** |
1114 |
> > *** libtool.m4 and ltmain.sh have a version mismatch! *** |
1115 |
> > *** (libtool.m4 = 1.5.22, ltmain.sh = "1.5.22 Debian 1.5.22-4") *** |
1116 |
> > |
1117 |
> > Please run: |
1118 |
> > |
1119 |
> > libtoolize --copy --force |
1120 |
> > |
1121 |
> > if appropriate, please contact the maintainer of this |
1122 |
> > package (or your distribution) for help. |
1123 |
> > |
1124 |
> > make: *** [config.status] Error 1 |
1125 |
> > |
1126 |
> > !!! ERROR: media-libs/imlib2-1.3.0 failed. |
1127 |
> > Call stack: |
1128 |
> > ebuild.sh, line 1546: Called dyn_compile |
1129 |
> > ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile |
1130 |
> > imlib2-1.3.0.ebuild, line 52: Called enlightenment_src_compile |
1131 |
> > enlightenment.eclass, line 150: Called enlightenment_die 'emake |
1132 |
> > failed' enlightenment.eclass, line 102: Called die |
1133 |
> > |
1134 |
> > !!! emake failed |
1135 |
> > !!! SEND BUG REPORTS TO vapier@g.o NOT THE E TEAM |
1136 |
> > !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call |
1137 |
> > stack if relevant. |
1138 |
> > |
1139 |
> > Is this a known error? |
1140 |
> |
1141 |
> I run e17 cvs version and I run into this a lot. Every time, running |
1142 |
> libtoolize --copy --force like the script says fixes it. It's an |
1143 |
> enlightenment bug, not a gentoo bug |
1144 |
> |
1145 |
> alan |
1146 |
> -- |
1147 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1148 |
> |
1149 |
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:42, Greg Morin wrote: |
1150 |
> > VIDEO_CARDS was/is set. The tweaking was in USE - 'png' was necessary |
1151 |
> > before 'emerge cario'. |
1152 |
> |
1153 |
> Oh good, all's well that ends well. |
1154 |
> |
1155 |
> But I'm curious to know how the lack of the png USE flag to cairo caused |
1156 |
> X to not load your video driver per the original error message. Or was |
1157 |
> cairo just the last of several somewhat related things that had to be |
1158 |
> remerged? |
1159 |
> |
1160 |
> alan |
1161 |
> -- |
1162 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1163 |
> |
1164 |
> szerda 08 november 2006 15.39 dátummal Bo Ørsted Andresen ezt írta: |
1165 |
> > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:18, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
1166 |
> > > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote: |
1167 |
> > > > Hi! |
1168 |
> > > > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation |
1169 |
> is |
1170 |
> > > > |
1171 |
> > > > finished: |
1172 |
> > > > >>> Source compiled. |
1173 |
> > > > |
1174 |
> > > > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY |
1175 |
> > > > --------------------------- |
1176 |
> > > > LOG FILE = |
1177 |
> > > > |
1178 |
> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log" |
1179 |
> > > > |
1180 |
> > > > access_wr: / |
1181 |
> > > > |
1182 |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
1183 |
> > > >-- ----- |
1184 |
> > > > |
1185 |
> > > > What does this mean? |
1186 |
> > > > |
1187 |
> > > > Thanks, |
1188 |
> > > > István |
1189 |
> > > |
1190 |
> > > as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried to write outside of the |
1191 |
> sandbox |
1192 |
> > > and got stopped. Read the log. Usually that means that something is |
1193 |
> broken. |
1194 |
> > > Try a different pgp version - and don't disable sandbox. Disabling |
1195 |
> sanbox |
1196 |
> > > is evil. |
1197 |
> > |
1198 |
> > Actually the most likely cause is bug #101433 [1]. Which means he needs to |
1199 |
> > upgrade his sandbox: |
1200 |
> > |
1201 |
> > # FEATURES=-sandbox emerge --oneshot sandbox |
1202 |
> > |
1203 |
> > After that he should have no issues with emerging gnupg without disabling |
1204 |
> > sandbox. |
1205 |
> > |
1206 |
> > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101433 |
1207 |
> |
1208 |
> Thank you, it is solved the problem. |
1209 |
> |
1210 |
> Best regards, |
1211 |
> István |
1212 |
> |
1213 |
> -- |
1214 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1215 |
> |
1216 |
> Hi, |
1217 |
> |
1218 |
> I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables stop |
1219 |
> working. |
1220 |
> |
1221 |
> I get this error: |
1222 |
> |
1223 |
> # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre |
1224 |
> getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory |
1225 |
> |
1226 |
> I have those modules loaded: |
1227 |
> |
1228 |
> # lsmod |
1229 |
> Module Size Used by |
1230 |
> iptable_filter 3968 0 |
1231 |
> ip_tables 14436 1 iptable_filter |
1232 |
> x_tables 14980 1 ip_tables |
1233 |
> |
1234 |
> is there anything missing? It worked fine with old kernel... |
1235 |
> |
1236 |
> cheers! |
1237 |
> -- |
1238 |
> Arnau Bria |
1239 |
> http://blog.emergetux.net |
1240 |
> Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou. |
1241 |
> Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe. |
1242 |
> Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas. |
1243 |
> -- |
1244 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1245 |
> |
1246 |
> Hi, |
1247 |
> |
1248 |
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:31:20 +0100 Sergio Polini <sp_rm_it@×××××.it> |
1249 |
> wrote: |
1250 |
> |
1251 |
> > [sp ~]$ aoss vmware & |
1252 |
> > [2] 5598 |
1253 |
> > [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object 'libaoss.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be |
1254 |
> > preloaded: ignored. |
1255 |
> |
1256 |
> What are the permissions on *this* one (aoss32 seems not to be for you, |
1257 |
> so /emul/linux/... isn't relevant), i.e. /usr/lib/libaoss.so (and the |
1258 |
> file it points to in case it's a symlink)? |
1259 |
> |
1260 |
> You answered my last question about why you are mocking with "chmod +s" |
1261 |
> with something along the lines of "I felt like I had to". What makes |
1262 |
> you think you have to? Why should those libraries be set with setuid? |
1263 |
> |
1264 |
> -hwh |
1265 |
> -- |
1266 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1267 |
> |
1268 |
> |
1269 |
> > Are there any readers of this list that still provide their own |
1270 |
> > primary/secondary dns services? Or offer secondary services to |
1271 |
> > others for a fee or free? |
1272 |
> > |
1273 |
> > I'm either a dinosaur or I have missed something fundamental on |
1274 |
> > the evolution of DNS? |
1275 |
> > |
1276 |
> |
1277 |
> http://www.easydns.com/secondarydns.php3 |
1278 |
> |
1279 |
> http://www.secondarydns.ca/ |
1280 |
> |
1281 |
> http://www.backupdns.com/index.html |
1282 |
> |
1283 |
> http://www.twisted4life.com/index.php |
1284 |
> |
1285 |
> http://soa.granitecanyon.com/ |
1286 |
> |
1287 |
> If you're just looking for a place that will simply act as a slave NS |
1288 |
> for your zones, give one of them a try. |
1289 |
> |
1290 |
> There used to be a few more services, and I was offering such services |
1291 |
> at one point but the sheer volume of "plz set up mi DNS plz!!" noobs |
1292 |
> became overwhelming. |
1293 |
> -- |
1294 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1295 |
> |
1296 |
> Hi, |
1297 |
> |
1298 |
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:29:45 +0100 Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> |
1299 |
> wrote: |
1300 |
> |
1301 |
> > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables stop |
1302 |
> > working. |
1303 |
> |
1304 |
> As iptables is very depending on the kernel's API, did you |
1305 |
> - change kernel configuration? |
1306 |
> - try re-emerging iptables? |
1307 |
> |
1308 |
> -hwh |
1309 |
> -- |
1310 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1311 |
> |
1312 |
> Perhaps try these modules as well? |
1313 |
> |
1314 |
> gentoo sbin # lsmod |
1315 |
> Module Size Used by |
1316 |
> xt_tcpudp 7936 1 |
1317 |
> iptable_nat 10756 1 |
1318 |
> ip_nat 21292 1 iptable_nat |
1319 |
> ip_conntrack 51332 2 iptable_nat,ip_nat |
1320 |
> iptable_filter 7296 0 |
1321 |
> ip_tables 22760 2 iptable_nat,iptable_filter |
1322 |
> x_tables 18568 3 xt_tcpudp,iptable_nat,ip_tables |
1323 |
> |
1324 |
> Tim |
1325 |
> |
1326 |
> On 11/8/06, Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
1327 |
> > Hi, |
1328 |
> > |
1329 |
> > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables stop |
1330 |
> > working. |
1331 |
> > |
1332 |
> > I get this error: |
1333 |
> > |
1334 |
> > # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre |
1335 |
> > getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory |
1336 |
> > |
1337 |
> > I have those modules loaded: |
1338 |
> > |
1339 |
> > # lsmod |
1340 |
> > Module Size Used by |
1341 |
> > iptable_filter 3968 0 |
1342 |
> > ip_tables 14436 1 iptable_filter |
1343 |
> > x_tables 14980 1 ip_tables |
1344 |
> > |
1345 |
> > is there anything missing? It worked fine with old kernel... |
1346 |
> > |
1347 |
> > cheers! |
1348 |
> > -- |
1349 |
> > Arnau Bria |
1350 |
> > http://blog.emergetux.net |
1351 |
> > Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou. |
1352 |
> > Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe. |
1353 |
> > Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas. |
1354 |
> > -- |
1355 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1356 |
> > |
1357 |
> > |
1358 |
> |
1359 |
> |
1360 |
> Both parrot-0.4.6 & openoffice-2.0.4 (on AMD64) fail to run because they |
1361 |
> are linked to *.so.34 versions of libraries in dev-libs/icu-3.4.1. The |
1362 |
> current version is 3.6 with *.so.36 libraries. |
1363 |
> |
1364 |
> Is this a bug? If it is a bug, is it a bug against parrot & openoffice, |
1365 |
> icu or portage? |
1366 |
> |
1367 |
> BTW, re-emerging parrot fixed parrot's problem, and I have 5 hours, 31 |
1368 |
> minutes and 40 seconds before I can tell you if it fixed openoffice's |
1369 |
> problem (I'm assuming it will). |
1370 |
> |
1371 |
> --- Vladimir |
1372 |
> |
1373 |
> -- |
1374 |
> Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> |
1375 |
> |
1376 |
> -- |
1377 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1378 |
> |
1379 |
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:16:20 +0100 |
1380 |
> Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: |
1381 |
> |
1382 |
> > Hi, |
1383 |
> > |
1384 |
> > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:29:45 +0100 Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> |
1385 |
> > wrote: |
1386 |
> > |
1387 |
> > > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables |
1388 |
> > > stop working. |
1389 |
> > |
1390 |
> > As iptables is very depending on the kernel's API, did you |
1391 |
> > - change kernel configuration? |
1392 |
> |
1393 |
> nop. just make oldconfig with default values for new options. |
1394 |
> |
1395 |
> > - try re-emerging iptables? |
1396 |
> nop, gonna do it. |
1397 |
> |
1398 |
> > -hwh |
1399 |
> thanks! |
1400 |
> |
1401 |
> -- |
1402 |
> Arnau Bria |
1403 |
> http://blog.emergetux.net |
1404 |
> Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou. |
1405 |
> Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe. |
1406 |
> Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas. |
1407 |
> -- |
1408 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1409 |
> |
1410 |
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:33:31 +0100 |
1411 |
> Arnau Bria wrote: |
1412 |
> |
1413 |
> > > As iptables is very depending on the kernel's API, did you |
1414 |
> > > - change kernel configuration? |
1415 |
> > nop. just make oldconfig with default values for new options. |
1416 |
> |
1417 |
> > > - try re-emerging iptables? |
1418 |
> I've recompiled iptables and I still have same problem... |
1419 |
> |
1420 |
> |
1421 |
> > > -hwh |
1422 |
> thanks! |
1423 |
> |
1424 |
> |
1425 |
> -- |
1426 |
> Arnau Bria |
1427 |
> http://blog.emergetux.net |
1428 |
> Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou. |
1429 |
> Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe. |
1430 |
> Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas. |
1431 |
> -- |
1432 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1433 |
> |
1434 |
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:20:48 -0800 |
1435 |
> Tim Garton wrote: |
1436 |
> |
1437 |
> > Perhaps try these modules as well? |
1438 |
> > |
1439 |
> > gentoo sbin # lsmod |
1440 |
> > Module Size Used by |
1441 |
> > xt_tcpudp 7936 1 |
1442 |
> > iptable_nat 10756 1 |
1443 |
> > ip_nat 21292 1 iptable_nat |
1444 |
> > ip_conntrack 51332 2 iptable_nat,ip_nat |
1445 |
> > iptable_filter 7296 0 |
1446 |
> > ip_tables 22760 2 iptable_nat,iptable_filter |
1447 |
> > x_tables 18568 3 |
1448 |
> xt_tcpudp,iptable_nat,ip_tables |
1449 |
> |
1450 |
> # lsmod |
1451 |
> Module Size Used by |
1452 |
> ip_conntrack 46112 0 |
1453 |
> xt_tcpudp 4096 0 |
1454 |
> xt_MARK 3328 0 |
1455 |
> iptable_filter 3968 0 |
1456 |
> ip_tables 14436 1 iptable_filter |
1457 |
> x_tables 14980 3 xt_tcpudp,xt_MARK,ip_tables |
1458 |
> |
1459 |
> # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre |
1460 |
> getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory |
1461 |
> |
1462 |
> (I don't use nat). |
1463 |
> |
1464 |
> Thanks for your reply. |
1465 |
> |
1466 |
> -- |
1467 |
> Arnau Bria |
1468 |
> http://blog.emergetux.net |
1469 |
> Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou. |
1470 |
> Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe. |
1471 |
> Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas. |
1472 |
> -- |
1473 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1474 |
> |
1475 |
> On 11/7/06, Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> wrote: |
1476 |
> > |
1477 |
> > You seem to know enough about these matters already to make a sane |
1478 |
> > judgement, so you probably already know that the real answer to your |
1479 |
> > question is "it depends". |
1480 |
> > |
1481 |
> > Here's what I would do: pop along to your local store, preferably not |
1482 |
> > one of the big chains, find the sanest sales guy with a clue and |
1483 |
> > explain your problem. Don't listen to his recommendations, just ask if |
1484 |
> > you can test his demo machines with the actual app in question. If it's |
1485 |
> > an owner run store he probably say yes. Then test the thing for real |
1486 |
> > and measure progress after 30 minutes or so. Buy the best performer. |
1487 |
> > |
1488 |
> > This will take a while, but at least you'll know for real which one |
1489 |
> > suits your needs best |
1490 |
> > |
1491 |
> > alan |
1492 |
> |
1493 |
> Thanks Alan. |
1494 |
> |
1495 |
> The problem with running the neural network app is that it's a huge |
1496 |
> install under Windows. It requires Internet access as it has a |
1497 |
> hardware key that has to be validated against the specific machine. |
1498 |
> Probably takes 1 hour just to set up. Then, once it's set up it takes |
1499 |
> maybe 15 minutes to run a single solution on my older Athlon XP 1600+. |
1500 |
> With that as background I'm sure you can understand that I'm not |
1501 |
> anxious to do it more than once or twice. |
1502 |
> |
1503 |
> What I was hoping to do was find some basic way of comparing the |
1504 |
> BogoMIPS on my old Athlon XP machine with BogoMIPS on some new |
1505 |
> machines at the dealer. They haven't had any problems in the past with |
1506 |
> me bringing in a LiveCD and booting Linux. If I could do this then I |
1507 |
> might estimate that the new machine will run the same speed or will |
1508 |
> run 3X the speed when doing these neural network jobs? |
1509 |
> |
1510 |
> Here's some info on the machines in my house today: |
1511 |
> |
1512 |
> 1) A 3GHz P4HT machine we use as a MythTV backend server and desktop |
1513 |
> machine: |
1514 |
> |
1515 |
> processor : 0 |
1516 |
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel |
1517 |
> cpu family : 15 |
1518 |
> model : 3 |
1519 |
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz |
1520 |
> stepping : 3 |
1521 |
> cpu MHz : 2995.346 |
1522 |
> cache size : 1024 KB |
1523 |
> <SNIP> |
1524 |
> bogomips : 5996.11 |
1525 |
> |
1526 |
> processor : 1 |
1527 |
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel |
1528 |
> cpu family : 15 |
1529 |
> model : 3 |
1530 |
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz |
1531 |
> stepping : 3 |
1532 |
> cpu MHz : 2995.346 |
1533 |
> cache size : 1024 KB |
1534 |
> <SNIP> |
1535 |
> bogomips : 5990.25 |
1536 |
> |
1537 |
> 2) My son's AMD Compaq low cost machine: |
1538 |
> |
1539 |
> processor : 0 |
1540 |
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD |
1541 |
> cpu family : 15 |
1542 |
> model : 47 |
1543 |
> model name : AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3200+ |
1544 |
> stepping : 2 |
1545 |
> cpu MHz : 1803.767 |
1546 |
> cache size : 256 KB |
1547 |
> <SNIP> |
1548 |
> bogomips : 3611.84 |
1549 |
> |
1550 |
> 3) 1 of 2 Pundit-R's used as Myth frontend machines: |
1551 |
> |
1552 |
> processor : 0 |
1553 |
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel |
1554 |
> cpu family : 15 |
1555 |
> model : 3 |
1556 |
> model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.26GHz |
1557 |
> stepping : 4 |
1558 |
> cpu MHz : 2261.847 |
1559 |
> cache size : 256 KB |
1560 |
> <SNIP> |
1561 |
> bogomips : 4526.57 |
1562 |
> |
1563 |
> |
1564 |
> 4) My AMD64 Gentoo machine is use daily: |
1565 |
> |
1566 |
> processor : 0 |
1567 |
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD |
1568 |
> cpu family : 15 |
1569 |
> model : 47 |
1570 |
> model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ |
1571 |
> stepping : 0 |
1572 |
> cpu MHz : 1809.286 |
1573 |
> cache size : 512 KB |
1574 |
> <SNIP> |
1575 |
> bogomips : 3619.63 |
1576 |
> |
1577 |
> 5) The current Athlon XP Windows machine is busy running Trading |
1578 |
> Solutions but when in Linux I *think* it has a BogoMIPS spec around |
1579 |
> 2800. No way to verify that right now. |
1580 |
> |
1581 |
> It's pretty boring but it seems that you can sort of double the CPU |
1582 |
> MHz spec and come pretty close to the BogoMIPS numbers. However that |
1583 |
> doesn't take cache size into account so maybe BogoMIPS isn't even the |
1584 |
> right thing to be looking at. |
1585 |
> |
1586 |
> At the root of it all my questions are: |
1587 |
> |
1588 |
> 1) How representative are BogoMIPS in determining how fast a machine |
1589 |
> will eventually be on compute bound apps? |
1590 |
> |
1591 |
> 2) Are there any good listings of BogoMIPS on different processor |
1592 |
> types and speeds? (This is what I really want....) |
1593 |
> |
1594 |
> 3) Do BogoMIPS include FPU measurements in case that is important for my |
1595 |
> app? |
1596 |
> |
1597 |
> 4) How well do BogoMIPS translate to the same machine when it runs Win XP? |
1598 |
> |
1599 |
> Anyway, thanks very much for your answers. I appreciate the help even |
1600 |
> if it isn't primarily about running Gentoo. I suspect there are others |
1601 |
> out there that have to dual boot. Maybe this will help someone in the |
1602 |
> future with similar questions. |
1603 |
> |
1604 |
> Cheers, |
1605 |
> Mark |
1606 |
> -- |
1607 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1608 |
> |
1609 |
> Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
1610 |
> Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) |
1611 |
> by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8H3obl010931 |
1612 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:50 GMT |
1613 |
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) |
1614 |
> by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DFF64442 |
1615 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:49 +0000 |
1616 |
> (UTC) |
1617 |
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org |
1618 |
> X-Spam-Score: -2.507 |
1619 |
> X-Spam-Level: |
1620 |
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.507 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.092, |
1621 |
> BAYES_00=-2.599] |
1622 |
> Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) |
1623 |
> by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) |
1624 |
> with ESMTP id UE4XhIw1U6yT for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; |
1625 |
> Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:38 +0000 (UTC) |
1626 |
> Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) |
1627 |
> (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) |
1628 |
> (No client certificate requested) |
1629 |
> by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009F0643C0 |
1630 |
> for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:37 +0000 (UTC) |
1631 |
> Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) |
1632 |
> id 1Ghqpd-0000Ty-43 |
1633 |
> for gentoo-user@g.o; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:03:21 +0100 |
1634 |
> Received: from dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net |
1635 |
> ([84.61.158.233]) |
1636 |
> by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) |
1637 |
> id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 |
1638 |
> for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:03:21 +0100 |
1639 |
> Received: from skoehler by |
1640 |
> dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim |
1641 |
> 0.1 (Debian)) |
1642 |
> id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 |
1643 |
> for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:03:21 +0100 |
1644 |
> X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ |
1645 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
1646 |
> From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= <skoehler@×××.de> |
1647 |
> Subject: [gentoo-user] switched from SiS to VIA chipset -> vesa framebuffer |
1648 |
> broken |
1649 |
> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:03:00 +0100 |
1650 |
> Lines: 45 |
1651 |
> Message-ID: <eit2k6$uie$1@×××××××××.org> |
1652 |
> Precedence: bulk |
1653 |
> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
1654 |
> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o> |
1655 |
> List-Unsubscribe: |
1656 |
> <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o> |
1657 |
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o> |
1658 |
> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
1659 |
> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o |
1660 |
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
1661 |
> Mime-Version: 1.0 |
1662 |
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; |
1663 |
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; |
1664 |
> boundary="------------enig9098F5707E46C5B0E9C64574" |
1665 |
> X-Complaints-To: usenet@×××××××××.org |
1666 |
> X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: |
1667 |
> dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net |
1668 |
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) |
1669 |
> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 |
1670 |
> Sender: news <news@×××××××××.org> |
1671 |
> |
1672 |
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) |
1673 |
> --------------enig9098F5707E46C5B0E9C64574 |
1674 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 |
1675 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable |
1676 |
> |
1677 |
> Hi, |
1678 |
> |
1679 |
> this is a really strange issue i'm having: |
1680 |
> |
1681 |
> i changed the motherboard, nothing else. I know have a K8T800Pro based |
1682 |
> motherboard. The old one was SiS-chipset based. |
1683 |
> |
1684 |
> So i was already running the vesa frambuffer at 1280x1024, 16-bit. And |
1685 |
> actually it worked perfect! |
1686 |
> |
1687 |
> No, after the switch to the VIA-chipset based Motherboard, i don't see |
1688 |
> the text that's printed to the screen. The resulition is switched, but |
1689 |
> the upper half of the screen stays black. When the text reaches the |
1690 |
> lower half, then i see the text, and then we come to the point, where |
1691 |
> the consolefont is set. And guess what: |
1692 |
> |
1693 |
> then suddenly everything works. I can see the text on the whole screen |
1694 |
> and so on. |
1695 |
> |
1696 |
> |
1697 |
> So something is wrong here. |
1698 |
> |
1699 |
> Any clue, how i might fix it? |
1700 |
> |
1701 |
> |
1702 |
> --------------enig9098F5707E46C5B0E9C64574 |
1703 |
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" |
1704 |
> Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature |
1705 |
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" |
1706 |
> |
1707 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
1708 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) |
1709 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
1710 |
> |
1711 |
> iD8DBQFFUg3E7Ww7FjRBE4ARAiqHAJ9NvF/T5E06G2FKYVWi3lfOwy2InACgyBU8 |
1712 |
> 7zZW0SONQ/Ja6GHX+dn8Xfo= |
1713 |
> =DRRB |
1714 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
1715 |
> |
1716 |
> --------------enig9098F5707E46C5B0E9C64574-- |
1717 |
> |
1718 |
> -- |
1719 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1720 |
> --658509eb2ccd8f6 |
1721 |
> Content-Type: message/rfc822 |
1722 |
> Content-Disposition: inline; |
1723 |
> filename="gentoo-user_54470.eml" |
1724 |
> |
1725 |
> Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
1726 |
> Received: from gimli.home.gaima.co.uk (brad.comodogroup.com [82.109.38.202]) |
1727 |
> by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8H9qJl023234 |
1728 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:09:53 GMT |
1729 |
> Received: (qmail 17699 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 17:09:51 +0000 |
1730 |
> Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) |
1731 |
> by localhost with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 17:09:51 +0000 |
1732 |
> From: Mike Williams <mike@××××××××.uk> |
1733 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
1734 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iptables error |
1735 |
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:09:47 +0000 |
1736 |
> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 |
1737 |
> References: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es> |
1738 |
> In-Reply-To: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es> |
1739 |
> Precedence: bulk |
1740 |
> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
1741 |
> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o> |
1742 |
> List-Unsubscribe: |
1743 |
> <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o> |
1744 |
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o> |
1745 |
> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
1746 |
> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o |
1747 |
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
1748 |
> MIME-Version: 1.0 |
1749 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; |
1750 |
> charset="iso-8859-1" |
1751 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
1752 |
> Content-Disposition: inline |
1753 |
> Message-Id: <200611081709.48647.mike@××××××××.uk> |
1754 |
> |
1755 |
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:29, Arnau Bria wrote: |
1756 |
> > I get this error: |
1757 |
> > |
1758 |
> > # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre |
1759 |
> > getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory |
1760 |
> |
1761 |
> Whenever I get errors like these my first step is to run the command under |
1762 |
> strace, then follow the reams of output backwards to find the file or |
1763 |
> directory it's looking for. |
1764 |
> |
1765 |
> # emerge strace |
1766 |
> # strace iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre |
1767 |
> |
1768 |
> Not quite sure how it will react to the redirection. |
1769 |
> |
1770 |
> -- |
1771 |
> Mike Williams |
1772 |
> -- |
1773 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
1774 |
> --658509eb2ccd8f6 |
1775 |
> Content-Type: message/rfc822 |
1776 |
> Content-Disposition: inline; |
1777 |
> filename="gentoo-user_54471.eml" |
1778 |
> |
1779 |
> Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
1780 |
> Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com |
1781 |
> [64.233.162.206]) |
1782 |
> by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HF6Qf004491 |
1783 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:15:07 GMT |
1784 |
> Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 9so2050995nzo |
1785 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:15:06 -0800 |
1786 |
> (PST) |
1787 |
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; |
1788 |
> s=beta; d=gmail.com; |
1789 |
> |
1790 |
> h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; |
1791 |
> |
1792 |
> b=p159QkNWx/ds1VsLoFDxB/apzcL9a56vZKmX9DNzPPTf5LCb3GDSO8EdMrExCggW7AJJIKPyeNUtcoUU7GFai1K2t2gf67WygMKLWFrUIOrEl+UMmQ+JRlNKP6nv38hyvtNzIOZTztKbbqO0Nb5tQIwUnLwTCOrXr3MYZ4ompVs= |
1793 |
> Received: by 10.65.242.10 with SMTP id u10mr12568383qbr.1163006106124; |
1794 |
> Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:15:06 -0800 (PST) |
1795 |
> Received: by 10.65.183.9 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:15:06 -0800 (PST) |
1796 |
> Message-ID: |
1797 |
> <4df051c10611080915l3095aaacs59ced9bcb455db54@××××××××××.com> |
1798 |
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:15:06 -0500 |
1799 |
> From: Erik <mistereastenstream@×××××.com> |
1800 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
1801 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] X crashes randomly |
1802 |
> In-Reply-To: |
1803 |
> <4df051c10611071314w243d76cetce2774378744d270@××××××××××.com> |
1804 |
> Precedence: bulk |
1805 |
> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
1806 |
> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o> |
1807 |
> List-Unsubscribe: |
1808 |
> <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o> |
1809 |
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o> |
1810 |
> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
1811 |
> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o |
1812 |
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
1813 |
> MIME-Version: 1.0 |
1814 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
1815 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
1816 |
> Content-Disposition: inline |
1817 |
> References: |
1818 |
> <4df051c10611061937v50abb1f5l6da4a3e2f4aaf25@××××××××××.com> |
1819 |
> <200611071539.49300.4ndrey@×××××.com> |
1820 |
> |
1821 |
> <4df051c10611071314w243d76cetce2774378744d270@××××××××××.com> |
1822 |
> |
1823 |
> Well, it seems it was but a temporary glitch, because I haven't had |
1824 |
> this problem occur anymore. Thanks to everybody for their input. |
1825 |
> |
1826 |
> On 11/7/06, Erik <mistereastenstream@×××××.com> wrote: |
1827 |
> > I tried revdep-rebuild; nothing was broken so nothing was built. |
1828 |
> > |
1829 |
> > And no, I don't have any developer packages installed. I use stable X |
1830 |
> > that employs AIGLX and composite with stable nvidia drivers, and a |
1831 |
> > stable kde that uses transparencies. I've been using Xorg-x11 7.1 |
1832 |
> > ever since it was marked stable, and I've had no problems until |
1833 |
> > yesterday. I literally sent this email not 1 hour after my problems |
1834 |
> > started and I couldn't find anything on bugzilla. |
1835 |
> > |
1836 |
> > On 11/7/06, Andrey <4ndrey@×××××.com> wrote: |
1837 |
> > > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 03:37, Erik wrote: |
1838 |
> > > > Hello, |
1839 |
> > > > Starting today, X has been acting a little strange for me. I'll be |
1840 |
> > > > doing nothing to spectacularer in kde, like typing in openoffice or |
1841 |
> > > > something else like that, and all of the sudden, X restarts and I am |
1842 |
> > > > faced with kdm. I don't know if this is a problem with something in |
1843 |
> > > > kde, kdm, or X, so I don't know where to file a bug. I haven't really |
1844 |
> > > > seen anything related to what I am dealing with in those places so |
1845 |
> > > > far. |
1846 |
> > > |
1847 |
> > > > and, the tail end of /var/log/kdm.log: |
1848 |
> > > |
1849 |
> > > What about /var/log/Xorg.0.log ? |
1850 |
> > That showed no errors at all, but I can post it anyway: |
1851 |
> > |
1852 |
> -------------------------------------------------------------- |
1853 |
> > |
1854 |
> > X Window System Version 7.1.1 |
1855 |
> > Release Date: 12 May 2006 |
1856 |
> > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1 |
1857 |
> > Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 x86_64 |
1858 |
> > Current Operating System: Linux erikstotle 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 #11 SMP |
1859 |
> > Mon Oct 9 21:19:04 EDT 2006 x86_64 |
1860 |
> > Build Date: 14 October 2006 |
1861 |
> > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org |
1862 |
> > to make sure that you have the latest version. |
1863 |
> > Module Loader present |
1864 |
> > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, |
1865 |
> > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, |
1866 |
> > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. |
1867 |
> > (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Nov 7 07:19:49 2006 |
1868 |
> > (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" |
1869 |
> > (==) ServerLayout "X.org Configured" |
1870 |
> > (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) |
1871 |
> > (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" |
1872 |
> > (**) | |-->Device "Card0" |
1873 |
> > (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" |
1874 |
> > (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" |
1875 |
> > (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/TTF/" does not exist. |
1876 |
> > Entry deleted from font path. |
1877 |
> > (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/OTF" does not exist. |
1878 |
> > Entry deleted from font path. |
1879 |
> > (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/CID/" does not exist. |
1880 |
> > Entry deleted from font path. |
1881 |
> > (**) FontPath set to: |
1882 |
> > /usr/share/fonts/misc/, |
1883 |
> > /usr/share/fonts/Type1/, |
1884 |
> > /usr/share/fonts/100dpi/, |
1885 |
> > /usr/share/fonts/75dpi/ |
1886 |
> > (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/share/X11/rgb" |
1887 |
> > (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules" |
1888 |
> > (**) Extension "Composite" is enabled |
1889 |
> > (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory) |
1890 |
> > (II) No APM support in BIOS or kernel |
1891 |
> > (II) Module ABI versions: |
1892 |
> > X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 |
1893 |
> > X.Org Video Driver: 1.0 |
1894 |
> > X.Org XInput driver : 0.6 |
1895 |
> > X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 |
1896 |
> > X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 |
1897 |
> > (II) Loader running on linux |
1898 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" |
1899 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/fonts/libbitmap.so |
1900 |
> > (II) Module bitmap: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
1901 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0 |
1902 |
> > Module class: X.Org Font Renderer |
1903 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5 |
1904 |
> > (II) Loading font Bitmap |
1905 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" |
1906 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libpcidata.so |
1907 |
> > (II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
1908 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0 |
1909 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.0 |
1910 |
> > (++) using VT number 7 |
1911 |
> > |
1912 |
> > (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) |
1913 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 10de,02f0 card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1914 |
> 80 |
1915 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:00:1: chip 10de,02fa card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1916 |
> 80 |
1917 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:00:2: chip 10de,02fe card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1918 |
> 80 |
1919 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:00:3: chip 10de,02f8 card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1920 |
> 80 |
1921 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:00:4: chip 10de,02f9 card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1922 |
> 00 |
1923 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:00:5: chip 10de,02ff card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1924 |
> 80 |
1925 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:00:6: chip 10de,027f card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1926 |
> 80 |
1927 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:00:7: chip 10de,027e card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1928 |
> 80 |
1929 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 10de,02fc card 0000,0000 rev a1 class 06,04,00 hdr |
1930 |
> 01 |
1931 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:03:0: chip 10de,02fd card 0000,0000 rev a1 class 06,04,00 hdr |
1932 |
> 01 |
1933 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:04:0: chip 10de,02fb card 0000,0000 rev a1 class 06,04,00 hdr |
1934 |
> 01 |
1935 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:05:0: chip 10de,0240 card 1043,81cd rev a2 class 03,00,00 hdr |
1936 |
> 00 |
1937 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 10de,0270 card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1938 |
> 00 |
1939 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 10de,0260 card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 06,01,00 hdr |
1940 |
> 80 |
1941 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:0a:1: chip 10de,0264 card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 0c,05,00 hdr |
1942 |
> 80 |
1943 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:0a:2: chip 10de,0272 card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 05,00,00 hdr |
1944 |
> 80 |
1945 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:0b:0: chip 10de,026d card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 0c,03,10 hdr |
1946 |
> 80 |
1947 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:0b:1: chip 10de,026e card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 0c,03,20 hdr |
1948 |
> 80 |
1949 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:0d:0: chip 10de,0265 card 1043,81c0 rev a1 class 01,01,8a hdr |
1950 |
> 00 |
1951 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:0e:0: chip 10de,0266 card 1043,81c0 rev a1 class 01,01,85 hdr |
1952 |
> 00 |
1953 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:0f:0: chip 10de,0267 card 1043,81c0 rev a1 class 01,01,85 hdr |
1954 |
> 00 |
1955 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:10:0: chip 10de,026f card 0000,0000 rev a2 class 06,04,01 hdr |
1956 |
> 81 |
1957 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:10:1: chip 10de,026c card 1043,81cb rev a2 class 04,03,00 hdr |
1958 |
> 80 |
1959 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:14:0: chip 10de,0269 card 1043,816a rev a3 class 06,80,00 hdr |
1960 |
> 00 |
1961 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:18:0: chip 1022,1100 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr |
1962 |
> 80 |
1963 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:18:1: chip 1022,1101 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr |
1964 |
> 80 |
1965 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:18:2: chip 1022,1102 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr |
1966 |
> 80 |
1967 |
> > (II) PCI: 00:18:3: chip 1022,1103 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr |
1968 |
> 80 |
1969 |
> > (II) PCI: 04:05:0: chip 104c,8023 card 1043,808b rev 00 class 0c,00,10 hdr |
1970 |
> 00 |
1971 |
> > (II) PCI: 04:09:0: chip 1319,0801 card 1319,1319 rev b2 class 04,01,00 hdr |
1972 |
> 80 |
1973 |
> > (II) PCI: 04:09:1: chip 1319,0802 card 1319,1319 rev b2 class 09,80,00 hdr |
1974 |
> 80 |
1975 |
> > (II) PCI: End of PCI scan |
1976 |
> > (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: |
1977 |
> > (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:2:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x0000 (VGA_EN is |
1978 |
> cleared) |
1979 |
> > (II) Bus 1 I/O range: |
1980 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x0000d000 - 0x0000dfff (0x1000) IX[B] |
1981 |
> > (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: |
1982 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfd800000 - 0xfd8fffff (0x100000) MX[B] |
1983 |
> > (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range: |
1984 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfd700000 - 0xfd7fffff (0x100000) MX[B] |
1985 |
> > (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: |
1986 |
> > (II) Bus 2: bridge is at (0:3:0), (0,2,2), BCTRL: 0x0000 (VGA_EN is |
1987 |
> cleared) |
1988 |
> > (II) Bus 2 I/O range: |
1989 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x0000b000 - 0x0000bfff (0x1000) IX[B] |
1990 |
> > (II) Bus 2 non-prefetchable memory range: |
1991 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfde00000 - 0xfdefffff (0x100000) MX[B] |
1992 |
> > (II) Bus 2 prefetchable memory range: |
1993 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfdd00000 - 0xfddfffff (0x100000) MX[B] |
1994 |
> > (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: |
1995 |
> > (II) Bus 3: bridge is at (0:4:0), (0,3,3), BCTRL: 0x0000 (VGA_EN is |
1996 |
> cleared) |
1997 |
> > (II) Bus 3 I/O range: |
1998 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x0000e000 - 0x0000efff (0x1000) IX[B] |
1999 |
> > (II) Bus 3 non-prefetchable memory range: |
2000 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfdc00000 - 0xfdcfffff (0x100000) MX[B] |
2001 |
> > (II) Bus 3 prefetchable memory range: |
2002 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfd900000 - 0xfd9fffff (0x100000) MX[B] |
2003 |
> > (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: |
2004 |
> > (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:10:0), (0,-1,-1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is |
2005 |
> set) |
2006 |
> > (II) Subtractive PCI-to-PCI bridge: |
2007 |
> > (II) Bus 4: bridge is at (0:16:0), (0,4,4), BCTRL: 0x0200 (VGA_EN is |
2008 |
> cleared) |
2009 |
> > (II) Bus 4 I/O range: |
2010 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x0000c000 - 0x0000cfff (0x1000) IX[B] |
2011 |
> > (II) Bus 4 non-prefetchable memory range: |
2012 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfdb00000 - 0xfdbfffff (0x100000) MX[B] |
2013 |
> > (II) Bus 4 prefetchable memory range: |
2014 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfda00000 - 0xfdafffff (0x100000) MX[B] |
2015 |
> > (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: |
2016 |
> > (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:24:0), (0,0,4), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) |
2017 |
> > (II) Bus 0 I/O range: |
2018 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B] |
2019 |
> > (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: |
2020 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[B] |
2021 |
> > (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: |
2022 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[B] |
2023 |
> > (--) PCI:*(0:5:0) nVidia Corporation C51PV [GeForce 6150] rev 162, Mem |
2024 |
> > @ 0xfc000000/24, 0xe0000000/28, 0xfb000000/24 |
2025 |
> > (II) Addressable bus resource ranges are |
2026 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[B] |
2027 |
> > [1] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B] |
2028 |
> > (II) OS-reported resource ranges: |
2029 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) |
2030 |
> > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] |
2031 |
> > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] |
2032 |
> > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] |
2033 |
> > [4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] |
2034 |
> > [5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] |
2035 |
> > (II) Active PCI resource ranges: |
2036 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2037 |
> > [1] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B] |
2038 |
> > [2] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2039 |
> > [3] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2040 |
> > [4] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2041 |
> > [5] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2042 |
> > [6] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B] |
2043 |
> > [7] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2044 |
> > [8] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2045 |
> > [9] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B) |
2046 |
> > [10] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2047 |
> > [11] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2048 |
> > [12] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B] |
2049 |
> > [13] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B] |
2050 |
> > [14] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B] |
2051 |
> > [15] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B] |
2052 |
> > [16] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B] |
2053 |
> > [17] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2054 |
> > [18] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2055 |
> > [19] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B] |
2056 |
> > [20] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B] |
2057 |
> > [21] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B] |
2058 |
> > [22] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2059 |
> > [23] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2060 |
> > [24] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2061 |
> > [25] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B] |
2062 |
> > [26] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B] |
2063 |
> > (II) Active PCI resource ranges after removing overlaps: |
2064 |
> > [0] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2065 |
> > [1] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B] |
2066 |
> > [2] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2067 |
> > [3] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2068 |
> > [4] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2069 |
> > [5] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2070 |
> > [6] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B] |
2071 |
> > [7] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2072 |
> > [8] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2073 |
> > [9] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B) |
2074 |
> > [10] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2075 |
> > [11] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2076 |
> > [12] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B] |
2077 |
> > [13] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B] |
2078 |
> > [14] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B] |
2079 |
> > [15] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B] |
2080 |
> > [16] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B] |
2081 |
> > [17] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2082 |
> > [18] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2083 |
> > [19] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B] |
2084 |
> > [20] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B] |
2085 |
> > [21] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B] |
2086 |
> > [22] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2087 |
> > [23] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2088 |
> > [24] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2089 |
> > [25] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B] |
2090 |
> > [26] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B] |
2091 |
> > (II) OS-reported resource ranges after removing overlaps with PCI: |
2092 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) |
2093 |
> > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] |
2094 |
> > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] |
2095 |
> > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] |
2096 |
> > [4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] |
2097 |
> > [5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] |
2098 |
> > (II) All system resource ranges: |
2099 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) |
2100 |
> > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] |
2101 |
> > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] |
2102 |
> > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] |
2103 |
> > [4] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2104 |
> > [5] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B] |
2105 |
> > [6] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2106 |
> > [7] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2107 |
> > [8] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2108 |
> > [9] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2109 |
> > [10] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B] |
2110 |
> > [11] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2111 |
> > [12] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2112 |
> > [13] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B) |
2113 |
> > [14] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2114 |
> > [15] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] |
2115 |
> > [16] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] |
2116 |
> > [17] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2117 |
> > [18] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B] |
2118 |
> > [19] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B] |
2119 |
> > [20] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B] |
2120 |
> > [21] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B] |
2121 |
> > [22] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B] |
2122 |
> > [23] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2123 |
> > [24] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2124 |
> > [25] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B] |
2125 |
> > [26] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B] |
2126 |
> > [27] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B] |
2127 |
> > [28] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2128 |
> > [29] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2129 |
> > [30] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2130 |
> > [31] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B] |
2131 |
> > [32] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B] |
2132 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "extmod" |
2133 |
> > (II) Loading |
2134 |
> /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libextmod.so |
2135 |
> > (II) Module extmod: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2136 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0 |
2137 |
> > Module class: X.Org Server Extension |
2138 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 |
2139 |
> > (II) Loading extension SHAPE |
2140 |
> > (II) Loading extension MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD |
2141 |
> > (II) Loading extension BIG-REQUESTS |
2142 |
> > (II) Loading extension SYNC |
2143 |
> > (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER |
2144 |
> > (II) Loading extension XC-MISC |
2145 |
> > (II) Loading extension XFree86-VidModeExtension |
2146 |
> > (II) Loading extension XFree86-Misc |
2147 |
> > (II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA |
2148 |
> > (II) Loading extension DPMS |
2149 |
> > (II) Loading extension TOG-CUP |
2150 |
> > (II) Loading extension Extended-Visual-Information |
2151 |
> > (II) Loading extension XVideo |
2152 |
> > (II) Loading extension XVideo-MotionCompensation |
2153 |
> > (II) Loading extension X-Resource |
2154 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "dbe" |
2155 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libdbe.so |
2156 |
> > (II) Module dbe: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2157 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0 |
2158 |
> > Module class: X.Org Server Extension |
2159 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 |
2160 |
> > (II) Loading extension DOUBLE-BUFFER |
2161 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "record" |
2162 |
> > (II) Loading |
2163 |
> /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/librecord.so |
2164 |
> > (II) Module record: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2165 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.13.0 |
2166 |
> > Module class: X.Org Server Extension |
2167 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 |
2168 |
> > (II) Loading extension RECORD |
2169 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "xtrap" |
2170 |
> > (II) Loading |
2171 |
> /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libxtrap.so |
2172 |
> > (II) Module xtrap: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2173 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0 |
2174 |
> > Module class: X.Org Server Extension |
2175 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 |
2176 |
> > (II) Loading extension DEC-XTRAP |
2177 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "glx" |
2178 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so |
2179 |
> > (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" |
2180 |
> > compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.8776 |
2181 |
> > Module class: X.Org Server Extension |
2182 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.1 |
2183 |
> > (II) Loading extension GLX |
2184 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "freetype" |
2185 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/fonts/libfreetype.so |
2186 |
> > (II) Module freetype: vendor="X.Org Foundation & the After X-TT Project" |
2187 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 2.1.0 |
2188 |
> > Module class: X.Org Font Renderer |
2189 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5 |
2190 |
> > (II) Loading font FreeType |
2191 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "type1" |
2192 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so |
2193 |
> > (II) Module type1: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2194 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.2 |
2195 |
> > Module class: X.Org Font Renderer |
2196 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5 |
2197 |
> > (II) Loading font Type1 |
2198 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" |
2199 |
> > (II) Loading |
2200 |
> /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so |
2201 |
> > (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" |
2202 |
> > compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.8776 |
2203 |
> > Module class: X.Org Video Driver |
2204 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "mouse" |
2205 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so |
2206 |
> > (II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2207 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.1.1 |
2208 |
> > Module class: X.Org XInput Driver |
2209 |
> > ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.6 |
2210 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "kbd" |
2211 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/input/kbd_drv.so |
2212 |
> > (II) Module kbd: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2213 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.1.0 |
2214 |
> > Module class: X.Org XInput Driver |
2215 |
> > ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.6 |
2216 |
> > (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 1.0-8776 Mon Oct 16 21:55:22 PDT 2006 |
2217 |
> > (II) NVIDIA Unified Driver for all Supported NVIDIA GPUs |
2218 |
> > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 |
2219 |
> > (--) Chipset NVIDIA GPU found |
2220 |
> > (II) Loading sub module "fb" |
2221 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "fb" |
2222 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfb.so |
2223 |
> > (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2224 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0 |
2225 |
> > ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.3 |
2226 |
> > (II) Loading sub module "ramdac" |
2227 |
> > (II) LoadModule: "ramdac" |
2228 |
> > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libramdac.so |
2229 |
> > (II) Module ramdac: vendor="X.Org Foundation" |
2230 |
> > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 0.1.0 |
2231 |
> > ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.0 |
2232 |
> > (II) resource ranges after xf86ClaimFixedResources() call: |
2233 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) |
2234 |
> > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] |
2235 |
> > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] |
2236 |
> > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] |
2237 |
> > [4] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2238 |
> > [5] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B] |
2239 |
> > [6] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2240 |
> > [7] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2241 |
> > [8] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2242 |
> > [9] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2243 |
> > [10] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B] |
2244 |
> > [11] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2245 |
> > [12] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2246 |
> > [13] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B) |
2247 |
> > [14] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2248 |
> > [15] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] |
2249 |
> > [16] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] |
2250 |
> > [17] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2251 |
> > [18] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B] |
2252 |
> > [19] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B] |
2253 |
> > [20] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B] |
2254 |
> > [21] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B] |
2255 |
> > [22] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B] |
2256 |
> > [23] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2257 |
> > [24] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2258 |
> > [25] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B] |
2259 |
> > [26] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B] |
2260 |
> > [27] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B] |
2261 |
> > [28] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2262 |
> > [29] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2263 |
> > [30] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2264 |
> > [31] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B] |
2265 |
> > [32] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B] |
2266 |
> > (II) resource ranges after probing: |
2267 |
> > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) |
2268 |
> > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] |
2269 |
> > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] |
2270 |
> > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] |
2271 |
> > [4] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2272 |
> > [5] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B] |
2273 |
> > [6] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2274 |
> > [7] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2275 |
> > [8] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2276 |
> > [9] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2277 |
> > [10] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B] |
2278 |
> > [11] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2279 |
> > [12] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2280 |
> > [13] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B) |
2281 |
> > [14] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2282 |
> > [15] 0 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B] |
2283 |
> > [16] 0 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B] |
2284 |
> > [17] 0 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B] |
2285 |
> > [18] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] |
2286 |
> > [19] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] |
2287 |
> > [20] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2288 |
> > [21] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B] |
2289 |
> > [22] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B] |
2290 |
> > [23] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B] |
2291 |
> > [24] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B] |
2292 |
> > [25] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B] |
2293 |
> > [26] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2294 |
> > [27] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2295 |
> > [28] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B] |
2296 |
> > [29] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B] |
2297 |
> > [30] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B] |
2298 |
> > [31] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2299 |
> > [32] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2300 |
> > [33] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2301 |
> > [34] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B] |
2302 |
> > [35] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B] |
2303 |
> > [36] 0 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B] |
2304 |
> > [37] 0 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B] |
2305 |
> > (II) Setting vga for screen 0. |
2306 |
> > (==) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32 |
2307 |
> > (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888 |
2308 |
> > (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor |
2309 |
> > (==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0) |
2310 |
> > (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "RenderAccel" "true" |
2311 |
> > (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "true" |
2312 |
> > (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "AddARGBGLXVisuals" "true" |
2313 |
> > (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling RENDER acceleration |
2314 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): Support for GLX with the Damage and Composite X extensions |
2315 |
> is |
2316 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): enabled. |
2317 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce 6150 at PCI:0:5:0 |
2318 |
> > (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoRAM: 524288 kBytes |
2319 |
> > (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 05.51.22.33.07 |
2320 |
> > (--) NVIDIA(0): Interlaced video modes are supported on this GPU |
2321 |
> > (--) NVIDIA(0): Connected display device(s) on GeForce 6150 at PCI:0:5:0: |
2322 |
> > (--) NVIDIA(0): Samsung (CRT-0) |
2323 |
> > (--) NVIDIA(0): Samsung (CRT-0): 350.0 MHz maximum pixel clock |
2324 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: CRT-0 |
2325 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: |
2326 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768" |
2327 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768 |
2328 |
> > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No size information available in CRT-0's EDID; cannot |
2329 |
> compute |
2330 |
> > (WW) NVIDIA(0): DPI from EDID. |
2331 |
> > (==) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (75, 75); computed from built-in default |
2332 |
> > (--) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp |
2333 |
> > (II) do I need RAC? No, I don't. |
2334 |
> > (II) resource ranges after preInit: |
2335 |
> > [0] 0 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B] |
2336 |
> > [1] 0 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B] |
2337 |
> > [2] 0 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B] |
2338 |
> > [3] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) |
2339 |
> > [4] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] |
2340 |
> > [5] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] |
2341 |
> > [6] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] |
2342 |
> > [7] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2343 |
> > [8] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B] |
2344 |
> > [9] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2345 |
> > [10] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B] |
2346 |
> > [11] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2347 |
> > [12] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2348 |
> > [13] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B] |
2349 |
> > [14] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B] |
2350 |
> > [15] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2351 |
> > [16] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B) |
2352 |
> > [17] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) |
2353 |
> > [18] 0 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B](OprD) |
2354 |
> > [19] 0 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B](OprD) |
2355 |
> > [20] 0 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B](OprD) |
2356 |
> > [21] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] |
2357 |
> > [22] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] |
2358 |
> > [23] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2359 |
> > [24] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B] |
2360 |
> > [25] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B] |
2361 |
> > [26] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B] |
2362 |
> > [27] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B] |
2363 |
> > [28] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B] |
2364 |
> > [29] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2365 |
> > [30] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2366 |
> > [31] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B] |
2367 |
> > [32] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B] |
2368 |
> > [33] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B] |
2369 |
> > [34] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B] |
2370 |
> > [35] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B] |
2371 |
> > [36] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B] |
2372 |
> > [37] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B] |
2373 |
> > [38] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B] |
2374 |
> > [39] 0 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B](OprU) |
2375 |
> > [40] 0 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B](OprU) |
2376 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "1024x768" |
2377 |
> > (II) Loading extension NV-GLX |
2378 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA 3D Acceleration Architecture Initialized |
2379 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): Using the NVIDIA 2D acceleration architecture |
2380 |
> > (==) NVIDIA(0): Backing store disabled |
2381 |
> > (==) NVIDIA(0): Silken mouse enabled |
2382 |
> > (**) Option "dpms" |
2383 |
> > (**) NVIDIA(0): DPMS enabled |
2384 |
> > (II) Loading extension NV-CONTROL |
2385 |
> > (==) RandR enabled |
2386 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM |
2387 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension |
2388 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension XTEST |
2389 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD |
2390 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension XC-APPGROUP |
2391 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension SECURITY |
2392 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA |
2393 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension XFIXES |
2394 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension XFree86-Bigfont |
2395 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension RENDER |
2396 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension RANDR |
2397 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension COMPOSITE |
2398 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension DAMAGE |
2399 |
> > (II) Initializing built-in extension XEVIE |
2400 |
> > (II) Initializing extension GLX |
2401 |
> > (**) Option "Protocol" "auto" |
2402 |
> > (**) Mouse0: Device: "/dev/psaux" |
2403 |
> > (**) Mouse0: Protocol: "auto" |
2404 |
> > (**) Option "CorePointer" |
2405 |
> > (**) Mouse0: Core Pointer |
2406 |
> > (**) Option "Device" "/dev/psaux" |
2407 |
> > (==) Mouse0: Emulate3Buttons, Emulate3Timeout: 50 |
2408 |
> > (**) Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" |
2409 |
> > (**) Mouse0: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4, 5, 6 and 7 |
2410 |
> > (**) Mouse0: Buttons: 11 |
2411 |
> > (**) Option "CoreKeyboard" |
2412 |
> > (**) Keyboard0: Core Keyboard |
2413 |
> > (**) Option "Protocol" "standard" |
2414 |
> > (**) Keyboard0: Protocol: standard |
2415 |
> > (**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30" |
2416 |
> > (**) Option "XkbRules" "xorg" |
2417 |
> > (**) Keyboard0: XkbRules: "xorg" |
2418 |
> > (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" |
2419 |
> > (**) Keyboard0: XkbModel: "pc105" |
2420 |
> > (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" |
2421 |
> > (**) Keyboard0: XkbLayout: "us" |
2422 |
> > (**) Option "CustomKeycodes" "off" |
2423 |
> > (**) Keyboard0: CustomKeycodes disabled |
2424 |
> > (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Keyboard0" (type: KEYBOARD) |
2425 |
> > (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Mouse0" (type: MOUSE) |
2426 |
> > (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "NVIDIA Event Handler" (type: |
2427 |
> Other) |
2428 |
> > xkb_keycodes { include "xfree86+aliases(qwerty)" }; |
2429 |
> > xkb_types { include "complete" }; |
2430 |
> > xkb_compatibility { include "complete" }; |
2431 |
> > xkb_symbols { include "pc(pc105)+us" }; |
2432 |
> > xkb_geometry { include "pc(pc105)" }; |
2433 |
> > (--) Mouse0: PnP-detected protocol: "ExplorerPS/2" |
2434 |
> > (II) Mouse0: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded |
2435 |
> > SetClientVersion: 0 9 |
2436 |
> > SetGrabKeysState - disabled |
2437 |
> > SetGrabKeysState - enabled |
2438 |
> > FreeFontPath: FPE "/usr/share/fonts/misc/" refcount is 3, should be 1; |
2439 |
> fixing. |
2440 |
> > (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory) |
2441 |
> > (II) No APM support in BIOS or kernel |
2442 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "1024x768" |
2443 |
> > (II) Loading extension NV-GLX |
2444 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA 3D Acceleration Architecture Initialized |
2445 |
> > (II) NVIDIA(0): Using the NVIDIA 2D acceleration architecture |
2446 |
> > (**) NVIDIA(0): DPMS enabled |
2447 |
> > (==) RandR enabled |
2448 |
> > (II) Initializing extension GLX |
2449 |
> > xkb_keycodes { include "xfree86+aliases(qwerty)" }; |
2450 |
> > xkb_types { include "complete" }; |
2451 |
> > xkb_compatibility { include "complete" }; |
2452 |
> > xkb_symbols { include "pc(pc105)+us" }; |
2453 |
> > xkb_geometry { include "pc(pc105)" }; |
2454 |
> > (II) Mouse0: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded |
2455 |
> > |
2456 |
> > > -- |
2457 |
> > > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
2458 |
> > > |
2459 |
> > > |
2460 |
> > |
2461 |
> > |
2462 |
> > -- |
2463 |
> > Erik |
2464 |
> > |
2465 |
> |
2466 |
> |
2467 |
> -- |
2468 |
> Erik |
2469 |
> -- |
2470 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
2471 |
> --658509eb2ccd8f6 |
2472 |
> Content-Type: message/rfc822 |
2473 |
> Content-Disposition: inline; |
2474 |
> filename="gentoo-user_54472.eml" |
2475 |
> |
2476 |
> Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2477 |
> Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com |
2478 |
> [66.249.92.172]) |
2479 |
> by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HJB1f017473 |
2480 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:19:11 GMT |
2481 |
> Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1708365ugc |
2482 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:19:11 -0800 |
2483 |
> (PST) |
2484 |
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; |
2485 |
> s=beta; d=gmail.com; |
2486 |
> |
2487 |
> h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; |
2488 |
> |
2489 |
> b=GpHAKAIk24zKuS/o/xaSDyvqEstYsHd36wRjSNxak7DXXBgydsVVNo6m/6T5QyY8Q9oPV3XC7p9gWhoWsLhTQmOO0ZTgJu2g3uNjKUTHSy/QI9IhUN7Iismv9Hv937EL7IjNzx+AxlCUXzmeqCz+o+Qmo1Cq1Tpg+QKT2uGvNlk= |
2490 |
> Received: by 10.82.172.15 with SMTP id u15mr1638288bue.1163006350393; |
2491 |
> Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:19:10 -0800 (PST) |
2492 |
> Received: by 10.82.106.3 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:19:10 -0800 (PST) |
2493 |
> Message-ID: |
2494 |
> <7573e9640611080919t7dd68ddemd48d96031463cfd4@××××××××××.com> |
2495 |
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:19:10 -0700 |
2496 |
> From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |
2497 |
> Sender: richard.j.fish@×××××.com |
2498 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2499 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iptables error |
2500 |
> In-Reply-To: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es> |
2501 |
> Precedence: bulk |
2502 |
> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2503 |
> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o> |
2504 |
> List-Unsubscribe: |
2505 |
> <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o> |
2506 |
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o> |
2507 |
> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
2508 |
> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o |
2509 |
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2510 |
> MIME-Version: 1.0 |
2511 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
2512 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
2513 |
> Content-Disposition: inline |
2514 |
> References: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es> |
2515 |
> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f680c2630a22ad7b |
2516 |
> |
2517 |
> On 11/8/06, Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
2518 |
> > Hi, |
2519 |
> > |
2520 |
> > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables stop |
2521 |
> > working. |
2522 |
> > |
2523 |
> > I get this error: |
2524 |
> > |
2525 |
> > # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre |
2526 |
> > getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory |
2527 |
> |
2528 |
> I'd suggest you make a copy of this file and try to identify which |
2529 |
> rule from this file is causing the error. It is a plain text file, so |
2530 |
> you can comment out (with '#' characters) various rules (lines that |
2531 |
> start with '[') to figure out which rule is causing the error. |
2532 |
> |
2533 |
> BTW, many of the filter options changed in recent kernels. You should |
2534 |
> double check your kernel configuration and make sure you have at least |
2535 |
> |
2536 |
> CONFIG_NETFILTER=y |
2537 |
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=m |
2538 |
> |
2539 |
> You'll also need at least some CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_* options under |
2540 |
> |
2541 |
> Networking-> |
2542 |
> Networking options -> |
2543 |
> Network packet filtering -> |
2544 |
> Core Netfilter Configuration -> |
2545 |
> |
2546 |
> -Richard |
2547 |
> -- |
2548 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
2549 |
> --658509eb2ccd8f6 |
2550 |
> Content-Type: message/rfc822 |
2551 |
> Content-Disposition: inline; |
2552 |
> filename="gentoo-user_54473.eml" |
2553 |
> |
2554 |
> Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2555 |
> Received: from gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de (gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de |
2556 |
> [134.76.163.126]) |
2557 |
> by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HLIGs019183 |
2558 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:21:18 GMT |
2559 |
> Received: by gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de (Postfix, from userid 8) |
2560 |
> id 901BCFFB80; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:21:18 +0100 (CET) |
2561 |
> Received: from localhost |
2562 |
> (dslb-082-083-036-105.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.83.36.105]) |
2563 |
> by gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0AFFF421 |
2564 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:21:13 +0100 |
2565 |
> (CET) |
2566 |
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:24:58 +0100 |
2567 |
> From: Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de> |
2568 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2569 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iptables error |
2570 |
> Message-Id: <20061108182458.0222c3fb.hilse@×××.de> |
2571 |
> In-Reply-To: <20061108175013.32d7edf6@××××××××××××.es> |
2572 |
> References: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es> |
2573 |
> <20061108171620.a05e1510.hilse@×××.de> |
2574 |
> <20061108173331.50db3ae7@××××××××××××.es> |
2575 |
> <20061108175013.32d7edf6@××××××××××××.es> |
2576 |
> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i586-pc-linux-gnu) |
2577 |
> Precedence: bulk |
2578 |
> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2579 |
> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o> |
2580 |
> List-Unsubscribe: |
2581 |
> <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o> |
2582 |
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o> |
2583 |
> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
2584 |
> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o |
2585 |
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2586 |
> Mime-Version: 1.0 |
2587 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
2588 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
2589 |
> X-Spam-Details: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, |
2590 |
> RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=2.64 |
2591 |
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on |
2592 |
> gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de |
2593 |
> |
2594 |
> Hi, |
2595 |
> |
2596 |
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:50:13 +0100 |
2597 |
> Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
2598 |
> |
2599 |
> > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:33:31 +0100 |
2600 |
> > Arnau Bria wrote: |
2601 |
> > |
2602 |
> > > > As iptables is very depending on the kernel's API, did you |
2603 |
> > > > - change kernel configuration? |
2604 |
> > > nop. just make oldconfig with default values for new options. |
2605 |
> > |
2606 |
> > > > - try re-emerging iptables? |
2607 |
> > I've recompiled iptables and I still have same problem... |
2608 |
> |
2609 |
> Hrm. Rethinking this, it might be due to an older set of include files |
2610 |
> in /usr/include/linux. But don't change that, it'll break various |
2611 |
> things. It might also be older an older interface used by glibc. |
2612 |
> |
2613 |
> Do you have other things emerged that are netfilter related? |
2614 |
> |
2615 |
> You can try to |
2616 |
> |
2617 |
> $ strace iptables-restore < iptables.saved |
2618 |
> |
2619 |
> and post the last 10-30 lines of output here. There'll probably be a |
2620 |
> getsockopt call that fails. |
2621 |
> |
2622 |
> Also have a look at your kernel's "make menuconfig", the module |
2623 |
> architecture for iptables has changed -- maybe "oldconfig" didn't do |
2624 |
> its job well... but I doubt that, since I've compiled everything as |
2625 |
> modules, too, and there's only the modules you mentioned first loaded |
2626 |
> for me. |
2627 |
> |
2628 |
> Are you running with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" ? Maybe you should try for |
2629 |
> iptables, e.g. |
2630 |
> |
2631 |
> $ ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge iptables |
2632 |
> |
2633 |
> that should give you iptables-1.3.6(-r1). |
2634 |
> |
2635 |
> -hwh |
2636 |
> -- |
2637 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
2638 |
> --658509eb2ccd8f6 |
2639 |
> Content-Type: message/rfc822 |
2640 |
> Content-Disposition: inline; |
2641 |
> filename="gentoo-user_54475.eml" |
2642 |
> |
2643 |
> Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2644 |
> Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com |
2645 |
> [66.249.92.170]) |
2646 |
> by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HUaqY031432 |
2647 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:30:37 GMT |
2648 |
> Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1711711ugc |
2649 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:30:36 -0800 |
2650 |
> (PST) |
2651 |
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; |
2652 |
> s=beta; d=gmail.com; |
2653 |
> |
2654 |
> h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; |
2655 |
> |
2656 |
> b=Azo8/tdNmmqS9S9P4iFDRzV26NxB1p4BWzQjB8SWszSrl8uL88YCrwFgt1VihjZ5KV9QrbDioBhF4h4hos3U4lusaIp1rJue8fgfRNZ13r0Zj1Os1cSunTeFeSfN33dXnra3vPMblZGRKsfLMLETEpFQh/KKmfNuiWKJYs0sjnw= |
2657 |
> Received: by 10.82.98.13 with SMTP id v13mr1771444bub.1163007036192; |
2658 |
> Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:30:36 -0800 (PST) |
2659 |
> Received: by 10.82.106.3 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:30:36 -0800 (PST) |
2660 |
> Message-ID: |
2661 |
> <7573e9640611080930y6425d0b9r4f961b0eb170ef04@××××××××××.com> |
2662 |
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:30:36 -0700 |
2663 |
> From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |
2664 |
> Sender: richard.j.fish@×××××.com |
2665 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2666 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WinXP under VMWare: no sound |
2667 |
> In-Reply-To: <20061108170408.006c6f33.hilse@×××.de> |
2668 |
> Precedence: bulk |
2669 |
> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2670 |
> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o> |
2671 |
> List-Unsubscribe: |
2672 |
> <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o> |
2673 |
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o> |
2674 |
> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
2675 |
> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o |
2676 |
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2677 |
> MIME-Version: 1.0 |
2678 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
2679 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
2680 |
> Content-Disposition: inline |
2681 |
> References: <200611042241.56613.sp_rm_it@×××××.it> |
2682 |
> <200611080021.26494.sp_rm_it@×××××.it> |
2683 |
> |
2684 |
> <7573e9640611071608x16851fd3kfb5a817c9247ad50@××××××××××.com> |
2685 |
> <200611080831.20344.sp_rm_it@×××××.it> |
2686 |
> <20061108170408.006c6f33.hilse@×××.de> |
2687 |
> X-Google-Sender-Auth: df0f9968b8e8713c |
2688 |
> |
2689 |
> On 11/8/06, Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de> wrote: |
2690 |
> > You answered my last question about why you are mocking with "chmod +s" |
2691 |
> > with something along the lines of "I felt like I had to". What makes |
2692 |
> > you think you have to? Why should those libraries be set with setuid? |
2693 |
> |
2694 |
> This is necessary because vmware is a setuid executable, and you |
2695 |
> cannot use LD_PRELOAD with setuid executables unless those libraries |
2696 |
> are *also* setuid. |
2697 |
> |
2698 |
> Sergio, try doing chmod +s on |
2699 |
> /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so |
2700 |
> |
2701 |
> -Richard |
2702 |
> -- |
2703 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
2704 |
> --658509eb2ccd8f6 |
2705 |
> Content-Type: message/rfc822 |
2706 |
> Content-Disposition: inline; |
2707 |
> filename="gentoo-user_54476.eml" |
2708 |
> |
2709 |
> Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2710 |
> Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) |
2711 |
> by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8Hde66023058 |
2712 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:39:42 GMT |
2713 |
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) |
2714 |
> by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ACE64C47 |
2715 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:20:41 +0000 |
2716 |
> (UTC) |
2717 |
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org |
2718 |
> X-Spam-Score: -2.508 |
2719 |
> X-Spam-Level: |
2720 |
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.508 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.091, |
2721 |
> BAYES_00=-2.599] |
2722 |
> Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) |
2723 |
> by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) |
2724 |
> with ESMTP id eFdbe7lnBXCT for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; |
2725 |
> Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:20:31 +0000 (UTC) |
2726 |
> Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) |
2727 |
> (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) |
2728 |
> (No client certificate requested) |
2729 |
> by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F82364C6F |
2730 |
> for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:20:30 +0000 (UTC) |
2731 |
> Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) |
2732 |
> id 1Ghr5m-0003xL-9q |
2733 |
> for gentoo-user@g.o; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:20:02 +0100 |
2734 |
> Received: from dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net |
2735 |
> ([84.61.158.233]) |
2736 |
> by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) |
2737 |
> id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 |
2738 |
> for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:20:02 +0100 |
2739 |
> Received: from skoehler by |
2740 |
> dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim |
2741 |
> 0.1 (Debian)) |
2742 |
> id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 |
2743 |
> for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:20:02 +0100 |
2744 |
> X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ |
2745 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2746 |
> From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= <skoehler@×××.de> |
2747 |
> Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: switched from SiS to VIA chipset -> vesa |
2748 |
> framebuffer broken |
2749 |
> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:19:50 +0100 |
2750 |
> Lines: 46 |
2751 |
> Message-ID: <eit3jn$2sv$1@×××××××××.org> |
2752 |
> References: <eit2k6$uie$1@×××××××××.org> |
2753 |
> Precedence: bulk |
2754 |
> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2755 |
> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o> |
2756 |
> List-Unsubscribe: |
2757 |
> <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o> |
2758 |
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o> |
2759 |
> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
2760 |
> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o |
2761 |
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2762 |
> Mime-Version: 1.0 |
2763 |
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; |
2764 |
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; |
2765 |
> boundary="------------enigD2AC6F2534E6DFB713C21EC0" |
2766 |
> X-Complaints-To: usenet@×××××××××.org |
2767 |
> X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: |
2768 |
> dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net |
2769 |
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) |
2770 |
> In-Reply-To: <eit2k6$uie$1@×××××××××.org> |
2771 |
> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 |
2772 |
> Sender: news <news@×××××××××.org> |
2773 |
> |
2774 |
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) |
2775 |
> --------------enigD2AC6F2534E6DFB713C21EC0 |
2776 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 |
2777 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable |
2778 |
> |
2779 |
> > this is a really strange issue i'm having: |
2780 |
> >=20 |
2781 |
> > i changed the motherboard, nothing else. I know have a K8T800Pro based |
2782 |
> > motherboard. The old one was SiS-chipset based. |
2783 |
> >=20 |
2784 |
> > So i was already running the vesa frambuffer at 1280x1024, 16-bit. And |
2785 |
> > actually it worked perfect! |
2786 |
> >=20 |
2787 |
> > No, after the switch to the VIA-chipset based Motherboard, i don't see |
2788 |
> > the text that's printed to the screen. The resulition is switched, but |
2789 |
> > the upper half of the screen stays black. When the text reaches the |
2790 |
> > lower half, then i see the text, and then we come to the point, where |
2791 |
> > the consolefont is set. And guess what: |
2792 |
> >=20 |
2793 |
> > then suddenly everything works. I can see the text on the whole screen |
2794 |
> > and so on. |
2795 |
> >=20 |
2796 |
> > So something is wrong here. |
2797 |
> >=20 |
2798 |
> > Any clue, how i might fix it? |
2799 |
> |
2800 |
> So my theory is, that the System-BIOS (which uses graphics mode too, |
2801 |
> IMHO) does some strange initialization of the graphics card, and the |
2802 |
> linux-kernel doesn't reset it. |
2803 |
> |
2804 |
> |
2805 |
> --------------enigD2AC6F2534E6DFB713C21EC0 |
2806 |
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" |
2807 |
> Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature |
2808 |
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" |
2809 |
> |
2810 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
2811 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) |
2812 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
2813 |
> |
2814 |
> iD8DBQFFUhG27Ww7FjRBE4ARAqieAKCWQqaYoc3iKeGAt04qkt0CMyarfACfaaDS |
2815 |
> C50+Db/ulusQ/n7RJKT6ZA8= |
2816 |
> =6zOv |
2817 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
2818 |
> |
2819 |
> --------------enigD2AC6F2534E6DFB713C21EC0-- |
2820 |
> |
2821 |
> -- |
2822 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
2823 |
> --658509eb2ccd8f6 |
2824 |
> Content-Type: message/rfc822 |
2825 |
> Content-Disposition: inline; |
2826 |
> filename="gentoo-user_54477.eml" |
2827 |
> |
2828 |
> Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2829 |
> Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com |
2830 |
> [66.249.92.175]) |
2831 |
> by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8Hkd7k006792 |
2832 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:46:40 GMT |
2833 |
> Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1716458ugc |
2834 |
> for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:46:39 -0800 |
2835 |
> (PST) |
2836 |
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; |
2837 |
> s=beta; d=gmail.com; |
2838 |
> |
2839 |
> h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; |
2840 |
> |
2841 |
> b=VCg4mVrovzHwBABGKirev/f5pquGwZorK3pEvTg2qHUDnitQES38cdCwl8sl/crt9NKoG2tKFtoRSAZ8/B6m8l65r+/nj9t7PySYr0gPoz7eUts19Csv/HGcGLfr+J/eYdWgVohKvRq+5fCGMv2f6kuPZrlhB2Z3QDIYxj0s3nY= |
2842 |
> Received: by 10.82.111.8 with SMTP id j8mr1777128buc.1163007999011; |
2843 |
> Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:46:39 -0800 (PST) |
2844 |
> Received: by 10.82.106.3 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:46:33 -0800 (PST) |
2845 |
> Message-ID: |
2846 |
> <7573e9640611080946w2bae4dfai5d0620ff5688efaf@××××××××××.com> |
2847 |
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:46:33 -0700 |
2848 |
> From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |
2849 |
> Sender: richard.j.fish@×××××.com |
2850 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2851 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter |
2852 |
> In-Reply-To: <4551D9E9.9000104@××××××××××.net> |
2853 |
> Precedence: bulk |
2854 |
> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
2855 |
> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o> |
2856 |
> List-Unsubscribe: |
2857 |
> <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o> |
2858 |
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o> |
2859 |
> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
2860 |
> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o |
2861 |
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2862 |
> MIME-Version: 1.0 |
2863 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
2864 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
2865 |
> Content-Disposition: inline |
2866 |
> References: <455119BE.3050007@××××××××××.net> |
2867 |
> <45518BC0.6070700@××××××××.com> |
2868 |
> <4551D9E9.9000104@××××××××××.net> |
2869 |
> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4a2aac708b12602c |
2870 |
> |
2871 |
> On 11/8/06, Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
2872 |
> > I have been doing that for some time now and it still marks them as spam. |
2873 |
> > It is not always the same people but certain ones do get picked on a lot. |
2874 |
> > It seems to get it by subject too I guess. |
2875 |
> |
2876 |
> How about setting up a message filter for gentoo-user. I believe if |
2877 |
> you setup a filter to deliver the mail to a specific box, it will |
2878 |
> bypass any spam filtering (been awhile since I used mozilla mail |
2879 |
> clients, so not entire sure however). You could also add the specific |
2880 |
> people to your contacts, which should help the spam filter figure out |
2881 |
> that they are not spammers. |
2882 |
> |
2883 |
> > Any ideas where this info is kept? I thought of unmerging and then |
2884 |
> > cleaning out the directory and emerging it again. I'm not sure that will |
2885 |
> > work either though. |
2886 |
> |
2887 |
> I *think* it is in the training.dat file in your profile directory |
2888 |
> (~/.mozilla/..). Unfortunately this is not something that you can |
2889 |
> edit. You can however reset [1] the data through the junk mail |
2890 |
> controls in seamonkey. |
2891 |
> |
2892 |
> [1] |
2893 |
> http://opensourcearticles.com/thunderbird_15/english/part_05 |
2894 |
> |
2895 |
> -Richard |
2896 |
> -- |
2897 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
2898 |
> --658509eb2ccd8f6-- |
2899 |
> |
2900 |
> |
2901 |
> |
2902 |
> |
2903 |
|
2904 |
|
2905 |
-- |
2906 |
You can see what's happening at http://muhlesteins.com |
2907 |
|
2908 |
-- |
2909 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |