Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dennis Muhlestein <devel@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest of gentoo-user@gentoo.org issue 985 (54428-54477)
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:36:47
Message-Id: eeed88270611090831j2bc891ees4f42f18a3c673ad2@mail.gmail.com
1 On 11/8/06, gentoo-user+help@g.o <gentoo-user+help@g.o> wrote:
2 > Topics (messages 54428 through 54477):
3 >
4 > [gentoo-user] New install - startx not starting
5 > 54428 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
6 >
7 > [gentoo-user] [OT]Real compute cycles in a laptop?
8 > 54429 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
9 >
10 > [gentoo-user] X starting in 640x480 only
11 > 54430 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
12 >
13 > [gentoo-user] ??? ???
14 > 54431 - Wolfgang Liebich <wolfgang.liebich@×××××××.com>
15 >
16 > [gentoo-user] WinXP under VMWare: no sound
17 > 54432 - Sergio Polini <sp_rm_it@×××××.it>
18 >
19 > [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter
20 > 54433 - Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com>
21 >
22 > [gentoo-user] (EE) AIGLX error
23 > 54435 - Eugene Rosenzweig <eugene259@××××××××××××.net>
24 >
25 > [gentoo-user] imlib2 upgrade an ERROR
26 > 54436 - "Marco Calviani" <marco.calviani@×××××.com>
27 >
28 > [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world
29 > 54437 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
30 > 54443 - reader@×××××××.com
31 >
32 > [gentoo-user] New install - startx not starting
33 > 54438 - "Greg Morin" <gpmorin@×××××.com>
34 >
35 > [gentoo-user] sys-apps/kbd-1.12-r8
36 > 54439 - "Steve [Gentoo]" <gentoo_steve@×××××××.uk>
37 >
38 > [gentoo-user] sys-apps/kbd-1.12-r8
39 > 54440 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
40 >
41 > [gentoo-user] sys-apps/kbd-1.12-r8
42 > 54441 - Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk>
43 >
44 > [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world
45 > 54442 - Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk>
46 >
47 > [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world
48 > 54444 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
49 >
50 > [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter
51 > 54445 - Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net>
52 >
53 > [gentoo-user] wireless on boot
54 > 54446 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
55 >
56 > [gentoo-user] emerge error
57 > 54447 - ??? <stefi@××××××××××××.hu>
58 >
59 > [gentoo-user] emerge error
60 > 54448 - "Hemmann, Volker Armin"
61 > <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>
62 >
63 > [gentoo-user] Kopete plugins dissapeared
64 > 54449 - Rafael Barrera Oro <rafael@××××××××××××××××.ar>
65 >
66 > [gentoo-user] emerge error
67 > 54450 - ??? <stefi@××××××××××××.hu>
68 >
69 > [gentoo-user] emerge error
70 > 54451 - Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk>
71 >
72 > [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter
73 > 54452 - Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com>
74 >
75 > [gentoo-user] Kopete plugins dissapeared
76 > 54453 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
77 >
78 > [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world
79 > 54454 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
80 >
81 > [gentoo-user] imlib2 upgrade an ERROR
82 > 54455 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
83 >
84 > [gentoo-user] New install - startx not starting
85 > 54456 - Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
86 >
87 > [gentoo-user] emerge error
88 > 54457 - Stefán István <stefi@××××××××××××.hu>
89 >
90 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
91 > 54458 - Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net>
92 >
93 > [gentoo-user] WinXP under VMWare: no sound
94 > 54459 - Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de>
95 >
96 > [gentoo-user] Re: OT Good DNS registrar?
97 > 54460 - Jonathan Nichols <jnichols@×××.net>
98 >
99 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
100 > 54461 - Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de>
101 >
102 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
103 > 54462 - "Tim Garton" <garton.tim@×××××.com>
104 >
105 > [gentoo-user] parrot & openoffice failures
106 > 54463 - "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <vgivanovic@×××××××.net>
107 >
108 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
109 > 54464 - Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net>
110 >
111 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
112 > 54465 - Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net>
113 >
114 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
115 > 54466 - Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net>
116 >
117 > [gentoo-user] [OT]Real compute cycles in a laptop?
118 > 54467 - "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com>
119 >
120 > [gentoo-user] switched from SiS to VIA chipset -> vesa framebuffer broken
121 > 54468 - ??? <skoehler@×××.de>
122 >
123 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
124 > 54470 - Mike Williams <mike@××××××××.uk>
125 >
126 > [gentoo-user] X crashes randomly
127 > 54471 - Erik <mistereastenstream@×××××.com>
128 >
129 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
130 > 54472 - "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
131 >
132 > [gentoo-user] iptables error
133 > 54473 - Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de>
134 >
135 > [gentoo-user] WinXP under VMWare: no sound
136 > 54475 - "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
137 >
138 > [gentoo-user] Re: switched from SiS to VIA chipset -> vesa framebuffer
139 > broken
140 > 54476 - ??? <skoehler@×××.de>
141 >
142 > [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter
143 > 54477 - "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
144 >
145 >
146 >
147 > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 16:06, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
148 > > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 15:00, Mick wrote:
149 > > > > The kernel seems good, I've added 'gpm', and 'xorg-x11'. startx
150 > > > > fails complaining about:
151 > > > > (EE) Failed to load module "radeon" (module does not exist, 0)
152 > > > > (EE) No drivers available.
153 > > > >
154 > > > > My question - how do I get/build this module?
155 > > >
156 > > > Add radeon in your /etc/make.conf under VIDEO_CARDS="radeon"
157 > >
158 > > And then run:
159 > >
160 > > # emerge --newuse -va x11-base/xorg-server
161 >
162 > Hang on a sec, if VIDEO_CARDS is empty or non-existent, doesn't the
163 > ebuild default to building all drivers, like 6.8 did? I never tried
164 > this myself, but I read it in a wiki HOWTO.
165 >
166 > If true, surely Greg's problem would never have happened?
167 >
168 > alan
169 >
170 > --
171 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
172 >
173 > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 05:18, Mark Knecht wrote:
174 > > Hi,
175 > > I'm in the market for a new laptop. I sold mine about a year ago
176 > > and it's time to get a new one. I will run both Linux and Win XP on
177 > > the machine. The Linux workload will not be anything substantial but
178 > > when in Win XP I have a program that I'll be running that is very
179 > > compute bound on my only XP desktop machine.
180 > >
181 > > Does anyone know of good comparative data on BogoMIPs in Linux vs.
182 > > real compute speed for different processors? I'm looking for some way
183 > > to compare different processors in the laptops I'm looking at vs. my
184 > > current XP desktop which is my slowest machine.
185 > >
186 > > The application under Windows is doing neural network stuff. I
187 > > have no idea how much of it is floating point based but my assumption
188 > > is that is a pretty big part of the whole picture. Is the AMD FPU
189 > > still superior to the Intel FPU or are they at parity these days?
190 > >
191 > > The current machine has 768MB. The application never uses more
192 > > than 256MB and there is no significant disk I/O but the processor
193 > > sits at 100% in XP for hours doing it's work optimizing the neural
194 > > network.
195 >
196 > You seem to know enough about these matters already to make a sane
197 > judgement, so you probably already know that the real answer to your
198 > question is "it depends".
199 >
200 > Here's what I would do: pop along to your local store, preferably not
201 > one of the big chains, find the sanest sales guy with a clue and
202 > explain your problem. Don't listen to his recommendations, just ask if
203 > you can test his demo machines with the actual app in question. If it's
204 > an owner run store he probably say yes. Then test the thing for real
205 > and measure progress after 30 minutes or so. Buy the best performer.
206 >
207 > This will take a while, but at least you'll know for real which one
208 > suits your needs best
209 >
210 > alan
211 > --
212 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
213 >
214 > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 20:37, Christian Herzyk wrote:
215 > > Any idea what the problem is?
216 >
217 > Please post your xorg.conf
218 >
219 > alan
220 > --
221 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
222 >
223 > Hi,
224 > Ich habe in meinem Büro einen neuen PC bekommen und ihn mit gentoo
225 > aufgesetzt, so wie den alten. ABER:
226 > Wenn ich auf meinem neuen PC versuche, via rdesktop zu irgendeinem
227 > Windows-Rechner zu gelangen, bekomme ich nur obige Fehlermeldung. Auf
228 > dem *alten* System klappt es - es ist auf beiden Systemen die gleiche
229 > Version installiert
230 > (eix -I rdesktop sagt
231 > * net-misc/rdesktop
232 > Available versions: 1.4.1 ~1.5.0 ~1.5.0-r1
233 > Installed: 1.4.1
234 > Homepage: http://rdesktop.sourceforge.net/
235 > Description: A Remote Desktop Protocol Client
236 > ), die gleichen USE-Flags ( equery uses sagt:
237 > $equery uses rdesktop
238 > [ Searching for packages matching rdesktop... ]
239 > [ Colour Code : set unset ]
240 > [ Legend : Left column (U) - USE flags from
241 > make.conf ]
242 > [ : Right column (I) - USE flags packages was installed
243 > with ]
244 > [ Found these USE variables for net-misc/rdesktop-1.4.1 ]
245 > U I
246 > - - debug : Tells configure and the makefiles to build for debugging.
247 > Effects vary across packages, but generally it will at least add -g to
248 > CFLAGS. Remember to set FEATURES=nostrip too
249 > - - ipv6 : Adds support for IP version 6
250 > - - oss : Adds support for OSS (Open Sound System)
251 > ), also ... was kann das sein??? Es kommt kein Fenster, es geht einfach
252 > nur nicht ... bizarr!
253 > Verwirrt in Wien,
254 > Wolfgang Liebich
255 > --
256 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
257 >
258 > Richard Fish:
259 > > > [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object
260 > '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so'
261 > > > from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
262 > >
263 > > What are the permissions on this?
264 >
265 > a)
266 > ls -l /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so.0.0.0 ->
267 > -rwxr-xr-x
268 >
269 > [sp ~]$ aoss32 vmware &
270 > [1] 5409
271 > [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object
272 > '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so' from
273 > LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
274 > (five times)
275 >
276 > testing ~ # aoss32 vmware &
277 > [1] 5439
278 > testing lib # ERROR: ld.so:
279 > object '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so' from LD_PRELOAD
280 > cannot be
281 > preloaded: ignored.
282 > (five times)
283 >
284 > b)
285 > chmod +s libaoss.so.0.0.0
286 > ls -l /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so.0.0.0 ->
287 > -rwsr-sr-x
288 >
289 > [sp ~]$ aoss32 vmware &
290 > [1] 5462
291 > [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object
292 > '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so' from
293 > LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
294 > (five times)
295 >
296 > testing lib # aoss32 vmware &
297 > [1] 5480
298 > testing ~ # ERROR: ld.so: object
299 > '/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so'
300 > from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
301 > (five times)
302 >
303 > But:
304 >
305 > testing ~ # aoss vmware &
306 > [1] 5515
307 > (sound works)
308 >
309 > [sp ~]$ aoss vmware &
310 > [2] 5598
311 > [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object 'libaoss.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
312 > preloaded: ignored.
313 >
314 > Sergio
315 > --
316 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
317 >
318 > Dale wrote:
319 > > Hi,
320 > >
321 > > I have noticed that some people on this list get marked as spam. I
322 > > think I hit the spam button a few times by mistake and it seems
323 > > Seamonkey remembers this very well. Is there a file that I can edit or
324 > > delete to "reset" this? Sort of give me a fresh start.
325 > >
326 > >
327 > >> [I--] [ ] www-client/seamonkey-1.0.5 (0)
328 > >>
329 > >
330 > >
331 > > Thanks
332 > >
333 > > Dale
334 > >
335 > > :-) :-)
336 > >
337 >
338 >
339 > When such a false positive arrives you could click "the spam button"
340 > again (its tooltip should say "mark as not junk") this should fix the
341 > problem.
342 >
343 > --
344 > Best regards,
345 > Daniel
346 >
347 >
348 > --
349 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
350 >
351 > Turi Tropea wrote:
352 > > hi people
353 > >
354 > > i have this in my /var/log/Xorg.0.log
355 > >
356 > > (EE) AIGLX error: dlsym for __driCreateNewScreen_20050727 failed
357 > > (/usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so: undefined symbol:
358 > > __driCreateNewScreen_20050727)
359 > >
360 > > (i have the USE aiglx in my make.conf)
361 > >
362 > > how i can resolve this Error?
363 > >
364 > > thanks and have a nice day
365 > >
366 > I have the same error here. I googled for it and found some info that
367 > the way to avoid this is to turn off AIGLX:
368 >
369 > Section "ServerFlags"
370 > Option "AIGLX" "off"
371 > EndSection
372 >
373 > The link I am looking at now
374 > (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=1697767) also
375 > suggests:
376 >
377 > Section "Extensions"
378 > Option "Composite" "0"
379 > EndSection
380 >
381 > to disable composite extension...
382 >
383 > Well, I put those info my xorg and nothing happened at all... Unless
384 > there is some really basic error I missed, it just doesnt work for me...
385 > You are welcome to try these.
386 >
387 > Eugene.
388 > --
389 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
390 >
391 > Hi list,
392 > when trying to do an emerge world, the system tries to upgrade to
393 > imlib2-1.3.0 from version 1.2(something). But during the configure
394 > step, it comes to this error:
395 >
396 > [......]
397 > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar
398 > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib
399 > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip... i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip
400 > checking for correct ltmain.sh version... no
401 > configure: error:
402 >
403 > *** [Gentoo] sanity check failed! ***
404 > *** libtool.m4 and ltmain.sh have a version mismatch! ***
405 > *** (libtool.m4 = 1.5.22, ltmain.sh = "1.5.22 Debian 1.5.22-4") ***
406 >
407 > Please run:
408 >
409 > libtoolize --copy --force
410 >
411 > if appropriate, please contact the maintainer of this
412 > package (or your distribution) for help.
413 >
414 > make: *** [config.status] Error 1
415 >
416 > !!! ERROR: media-libs/imlib2-1.3.0 failed.
417 > Call stack:
418 > ebuild.sh, line 1546: Called dyn_compile
419 > ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile
420 > imlib2-1.3.0.ebuild, line 52: Called enlightenment_src_compile
421 > enlightenment.eclass, line 150: Called enlightenment_die 'emake failed'
422 > enlightenment.eclass, line 102: Called die
423 >
424 > !!! emake failed
425 > !!! SEND BUG REPORTS TO vapier@g.o NOT THE E TEAM
426 > !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
427 > stack if relevant.
428 >
429 > Is this a known error?
430 > Regards,
431 > mc
432 > --
433 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
434 >
435 > On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:55:55 -0600, reader@×××××××.com wrote:
436 >
437 > > > Yes, meaningless; update world means the packages on YOUR machine,
438 > > > matching YOUR arch and dependencies requires by YOUR use flags have
439 > > > been changed. No one can relate to that without knowing all those
440 > > > settings, or a simple list of the packages updated with "genlop
441 > > > --list --date yesterday"
442 > > >
443 > >
444 > > Your repeating it ever louder does not make it so.
445 >
446 > Correct, it was already so.
447 >
448 > > update world
449 > > conveys a major update of the entire OS,
450 >
451 > No it doesn't. It updates whatever has been updated since you last ran
452 > it. This depends on the arch and USE flags you have, which packages
453 > you have installed and when you last did it. it could update two packages
454 > or two hundred. The point is, the statement gives no indication of which
455 > packages you have upgraded, so it is of no real help in diagnosing your
456 > problem.
457 >
458 > > then follows a very specific
459 > > error that I hoped someone would be able to identify.
460 >
461 > Which I did, and proposed a solution. It didn't work because I assumed
462 > you were using the split KDE ebuilds, a list of the packages you had
463 > updated would have shown otherwise and enabled me to give the answer I
464 > gave later in my first reply.
465 >
466 > When asking for help, it is difficult to give too much information but
467 > all to easy to give too little.
468 >
469 > > Your continued insistance on
470 > > this appears to be more about opinion than fact.
471 >
472 > No, it's about asking for the information needed to make a diagnosis.
473 >
474 > > > You're running the monolithic KDE ebuilds, so re-emerge kdebase.
475 > > > Incidentally, this is one of the situations where the split ebuilds
476 > > > really pay off, as you'd only have to recompile Konqueror rather than
477 > > > all the core KDE programs.
478 > >
479 > > Thanks, I'll be doing that.
480 >
481 > See, once you gave details about specific packages involved, it
482 > was easier to provide advice. Remote diagnosis usually involves some
483 > guessing as to the correct answer, don't make us guess the question too.
484 >
485 > You seem to have taken this as a personal attack, it was not. If you want
486 > people to be able to help you, give them what they need. My first
487 > response was simply some advice on one way doing this that "update world"
488 > does not achieve. You were not the first to fall into this trap; you will
489 > not be the last, but my discussing it I hope it may happen less often.
490 >
491 >
492 > --
493 > Neil Bothwick
494 >
495 > I'd prefer the non-smoking lifeboat, please.
496 >
497 >
498 > VIDEO_CARDS was/is set. The tweaking was in USE - 'png' was necessary before
499 > 'emerge cario'.
500 >
501 > Gpm
502 >
503 >
504 > On 11/7/06, Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> wrote:
505 > > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 16:06, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
506 > > > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 15:00, Mick wrote:
507 > > > > > The kernel seems good, I've added 'gpm', and 'xorg-x11'. startx
508 > > > > > fails complaining about:
509 > > > > > (EE) Failed to load module "radeon" (module does not exist, 0)
510 > > > > > (EE) No drivers available.
511 > > > > >
512 > > > > > My question - how do I get/build this module?
513 > > > >
514 > > > > Add radeon in your /etc/make.conf under VIDEO_CARDS="radeon"
515 > > >
516 > > > And then run:
517 > > >
518 > > > # emerge --newuse -va x11-base/xorg-server
519 > >
520 > > Hang on a sec, if VIDEO_CARDS is empty or non-existent, doesn't the
521 > > ebuild default to building all drivers, like 6.8 did? I never tried
522 > > this myself, but I read it in a wiki HOWTO.
523 > >
524 > > If true, surely Greg's problem would never have happened?
525 > >
526 > > alan
527 > >
528 > > --
529 > > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
530 > >
531 > >
532 >
533 >
534 >
535 > --
536 >
537 > Gpm
538 > The Morins of Plantsville
539 > Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
540 > > If you look at the configure script you will see that it's is testing if
541 > you
542 > > are on a sparc64. The test shows you aren't which appears to be unrelated
543 > to
544 > > your problem. Line 153 which appears to be failing is this:
545 > >
546 > > echo "ARCH=${TARGET_ARCH/i?86/i386}" >> make_include
547 > >
548 > > which is supposed to substitute i686 with i386 in your case and store it
549 > in
550 > > make_include as "ARCH=i386". I have no clue why that would fail. The only
551 > > thing that I can think of is to remerge your shell (probably
552 > > app-shells/bash). If noone else has a clue and that doesn't help I guess
553 > your
554 > > best option is to file a bug with the info you've posted now...
555 > Thanks for your help, and while it might not have been obvious to you
556 > (or anyone else reading along)... everything that was confusing before
557 > is clear now... to me at least. While I can see what is wrong, it isn't
558 > 100% clear if it constitutes a bug or not.
559 >
560 > The problem is that the configure script starts '#!/bin/sh' - but goes
561 > on to depend upon Bash specific features... specifically substitution.
562 > I expect this would not be a problem for most users where /bin/sh is a
563 > sym-link to /bin/bash.... but, for me, /bin/sh was a sym-link to
564 > /bin/ash... and, for that shell, line 151 is invalid. What is less
565 > clear is whether or not, in a Gentoo context, it is 'correct' to have
566 > /bin/sh being Borne-like but not Bash-like. By preference I'd prefer
567 > /bin/sh to be the minimal shell that will execute Borne-shell scripts...
568 > but I recognise the Linux-world normality of /bin/sh actually being bash.
569 >
570 > As at-least a temporary fix I replaced my /bin/sh->/bin/ash with a
571 > /bin/sh->/bin/bash... and everything now emerges smoothly... From a
572 > prissy perspective I'd have hoped that the configure script would
573 > specify that it needed bash functionality by demanding evaluation by
574 > bash instead of whatever /bin/sh happens to be...
575 >
576 > Thanks again,
577 >
578 > Steve
579 >
580 >
581 >
582 > --
583 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
584 >
585 > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:44:31 +0000, Steve [Gentoo] wrote:
586 >
587 > > The problem is that the configure script starts '#!/bin/sh' - but goes
588 > > on to depend upon Bash specific features... specifically substitution.
589 > > I expect this would not be a problem for most users where /bin/sh is a
590 > > sym-link to /bin/bash.... but, for me, /bin/sh was a sym-link to
591 > > /bin/ash... and, for that shell, line 151 is invalid. What is less
592 > > clear is whether or not, in a Gentoo context, it is 'correct' to have
593 > > /bin/sh being Borne-like but not Bash-like. By preference I'd prefer
594 > > /bin/sh to be the minimal shell that will execute Borne-shell scripts...
595 > > but I recognise the Linux-world normality of /bin/sh actually being
596 > > bash.
597 >
598 > Bash behaves differently when called as sh, to avoid just this sort of
599 > problem. However, if the script calls /bin/sh while requiring bash
600 > features it is clearly broken and a bug should be files.
601 >
602 > Unfortunately, this type of breakage is all too common; I tried using
603 > dash as /bin/sh for a short while and found all sorts of things falling
604 > over. In this case, it can be easily fixed, by the ebuild altering the
605 > shebang line of configure before running it.
606 >
607 >
608 > --
609 > Neil Bothwick
610 >
611 > Psychiatrists say that 1 of 4 people are mentally ill.
612 >
613 >
614 > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:44, Steve [Gentoo] wrote:
615 > > Thanks for your help, and while it might not have been obvious to you
616 > > (or anyone else reading along)... everything that was confusing before
617 > > is clear now... to me at least. While I can see what is wrong, it isn't
618 > > 100% clear if it constitutes a bug or not.
619 > >
620 > > The problem is that the configure script starts '#!/bin/sh' - but goes
621 > > on to depend upon Bash specific features... specifically substitution.
622 > > I expect this would not be a problem for most users where /bin/sh is a
623 > > sym-link to /bin/bash.... but, for me, /bin/sh was a sym-link to
624 > > /bin/ash... and, for that shell, line 151 is invalid.
625 >
626 > Heh, I just hadn't noticed that the first line of the script said /bin/sh.
627 > That's definitely a bug. Either the script must be modified to only
628 > use /bin/sh features or it must request a shell that supports it...
629 >
630 > --
631 > Bo Andresen
632 >
633 >
634 > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 04:55, reader@×××××××.com wrote:
635 > > Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> writes:
636 > > [...]
637 > >
638 > > >> I'd hoped someone would have had the same or similar situation and
639 > > >> error before posted piles of data... so no not meaningless.
640 > > >
641 > > > Yes, meaningless; update world means the packages on YOUR machine,
642 > > > matching YOUR arch and dependencies requires by YOUR use flags have been
643 > > > changed. No one can relate to that without knowing all those settings,
644 > or
645 > > > a simple list of the packages updated with "genlop --list --date
646 > > > yesterday"
647 > >
648 > > Your repeating it ever louder does not make it so. update world
649 > > conveys a major update of the entire OS, then follows a very specific
650 > > error that I hoped someone would be able to identify.
651 > >
652 > > So no not meaningless,
653 > >
654 > > Were it actually meaningless no one would have been able to help.
655 > > I was glad to supply any needed details. Your continued insistance on
656 > > this appears to be more about opinion than fact.
657 >
658 > The fact that we may sometimes be able to guess based on the error message
659 > doesn't change the fact that saying you upgraded some packages without
660 > stating which packages is entirely meaningless. If you would refuse to tell
661 > us which then you might as well leave out the fact that you upgraded
662 > anything. But it definitely is a lot easier if you just provided the output
663 > of e.g. "genlop --list --date yesterday" as mentioned by Neil. Also the
664 > purpose of Neil and I stating this isn't to make you or anyone else look bad
665 > but rather to make it easier for everyone in the future...
666 >
667 > --
668 > Bo Andresen
669 >
670 >
671 > Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> writes:
672 >
673 > > No it doesn't. It updates whatever has been updated since you last ran
674 > > it. This depends on the arch and USE flags you have, which packages
675 > > you have installed and when you last did it. it could update two packages
676 > > or two hundred. The point is, the statement gives no indication of which
677 > > packages you have upgraded, so it is of no real help in diagnosing your
678 > > problem.
679 >
680 > Here is meaningless:
681 >
682 > Konqueror errored out with this message "bla bla".
683 > What does it mean?
684 >
685 > What I gave was considerably more.
686 >
687 > OS update
688 > Konqueror errors out "bla bla". Any one know what it means.
689 >
690 > Lets see, OS update, the guy's running kde... we have specific
691 > library error.
692 >
693 > Maybe not so hard for someone who knows enough to make a connection
694 > there.
695 >
696 > Feigning surprise that your `meaningless' phrase was taken as some
697 > kind of (light) attack is also pretty phony.
698 >
699 > One does not liken something that was enough to point out a specific
700 > problem as `meaningless' without somekind of ill intent or at least a
701 > certain high handedness of language.
702 >
703 > So drop the surprise charade and just let this fade away.
704 >
705 > If you need more information just say so. No gimmick required.
706 >
707 > Once again, thanks for your input.
708 >
709 > --
710 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
711 >
712 > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:01:52 -0600, reader@×××××××.com wrote:
713 >
714 > This is getting silly, and all because I tried to help you. Maybe there's
715 > a lesson to be learned.
716 >
717 > > Here is meaningless:
718 > >
719 > > Konqueror errored out with this message "bla bla".
720 > > What does it mean?
721 > >
722 > > What I gave was considerably more.
723 > >
724 > > OS update
725 > > Konqueror errors out "bla bla". Any one know what it means.
726 > >
727 > > Lets see, OS update, the guy's running kde... we have specific
728 > > library error.
729 >
730 > But we don't know what changed on your system to cause that error,
731 > because you didn't tell us which packages you upgraded. Note that I did
732 > not call this statement meaningless but the comment about an update
733 > world. Look at my original post again, I edited it so that that comment
734 > only applied to a single statement, the error message was referenced
735 > later.
736 >
737 > > One does not liken something that was enough to point out a specific
738 > > problem as `meaningless' without somekind of ill intent or at least a
739 > > certain high handedness of language.
740 >
741 > You really don't get it do you? Try reading the thread again, you gave
742 > absolutely no indication of which packages were updated. Try looking up
743 > meaningless in a dictionary - stating that you did a world update without
744 > any context does indeed make that statement without meaning.
745 >
746 > > So drop the surprise charade and just let this fade away.
747 >
748 > Grow up!
749 >
750 > > If you need more information just say so. No gimmick required.
751 >
752 > I don't need anything from you. You are the one with the problem, I was
753 > trying to help you find a solution.
754 >
755 > > Once again, thanks for your input.
756 >
757 > Why? You have ignored everything I said to try to diagnose and fix the
758 > problem and focused entirely on a perceived insult from a comment that
759 > one statement in your original question provided no useful information;
760 > even though it also contained an explanation of why this was so and
761 > guidance on how to provide that information. I wish I hadn't bothered and
762 > had concentrated on the questions I am paid to answer.
763 >
764 >
765 > --
766 > Neil Bothwick
767 >
768 > Always be sincere... whether you mean it or not!
769 >
770 >
771 >
772 > Daniel Iliev wrote:
773 >
774 >
775 > When such a false positive arrives you could click "the spam button"
776 > again (its tooltip should say "mark as not junk") this should fix the
777 > problem.
778 >
779 >
780 >
781 > I have been doing that for some time now and it still marks them as spam.
782 > It is not always the same people but certain ones do get picked on a lot.
783 > It seems to get it by subject too I guess.
784 >
785 > Any ideas where this info is kept? I thought of unmerging and then
786 > cleaning out the directory and emerging it again. I'm not sure that will
787 > work either though.
788 >
789 > Dale
790 >
791 > :-) :-)
792 >
793 > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 19:35, Luigi Pinna wrote:
794 >
795 > > Alle 20:44, sabato 4 novembre 2006, Neil Bothwick ha scritto:
796 > > > On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 13:53:39 +0100, Luigi Pinna wrote:
797 > > > > But I continue to have some problems...
798 > > > > First, on boot time net.eth0 gives up and I must wait until timeout
799 > > > > before that boot could continue.
800 > > >
801 > > > emerge ifplugd and read the comments about it in
802 > > > /etc/conf.d/net.example
803 > >
804 > > Sorry I answer only now: I was not here!
805 > > Your command works good, now in boot time I don't wait about net.eth0
806 > > but net.wlan0 and net.eth0 seem not active, but the wireless works.
807 > > I found that my connection is not still stable.
808 >
809 > I'm not sure but it may have something to do with TTL and MTU sizes being
810 > different between your wireless router and your computer wifi card?
811 >
812 > > dmesg is full from this kind of messagges:
813 > > zd1211:Mixed Mode
814 >
815 > Assuming that is your zd1211 is your wireless card device I would comment
816 > out
817 > the mixed and infrastructure mode settings from the /etc/conf.d/net file to
818 > see if it makes a difference.
819 >
820 > If you still cannot find what's causing it I would suggest that you
821 > establish
822 > a basic connection to the router without passwd authentication, or anything
823 > clever and see if that holds the connection. If the connection failures
824 > continue, then it may have to do with a hardware problem. If the connection
825 > failures go away, then it is a configuration issue.
826 >
827 > HTH.
828 > --
829 > Regards,
830 > Mick
831 >
832 >
833 > Hi!
834 > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is
835 > finished:
836 >
837 > >>> Source compiled.
838 > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
839 > ---------------------------
840 > LOG FILE =
841 > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log"
842 >
843 > access_wr: /
844 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
845 >
846 > What does this mean?
847 >
848 > Thanks,
849 > István
850 >
851 > --
852 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
853 >
854 > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote:
855 > > Hi!
856 > > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is
857 > >
858 > > finished:
859 > > >>> Source compiled.
860 > >
861 > > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
862 > > ---------------------------
863 > > LOG FILE =
864 > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log"
865 > >
866 > > access_wr: /
867 > >
868 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
869 > >-----
870 > >
871 > > What does this mean?
872 > >
873 > > Thanks,
874 > > István
875 >
876 > as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried to write outside of the sandbox
877 > and
878 > got stopped. Read the log. Usually that means that something is broken. Try
879 > a
880 > different pgp version - and don't disable sandbox. Disabling sanbox is evil.
881 >
882 > --
883 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
884 >
885 > Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
886 >
887 > >On Monday 06 November 2006 23:22, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
888 > >
889 > >
890 > >>Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
891 > >>
892 > >>
893 > >>>On Monday 06 November 2006 22:33, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
894 > >>>
895 > >>>
896 > >>>>I recently emerged modular kde, and along with the coming of kopete
897 > >>>>0.12.3 all the plugins dissapeared except for the Cryptography plugin,
898 > >>>>does anyone now something about this? should i just re emerge it?
899 > >>>>
900 > >>>>Thanks in advance!
901 > >>>>
902 > >>>>Rafael
903 > >>>>
904 > >>>>
905 > >>>You'll have to enable the ones you want via USE flags.
906 > >>>
907 > >>>
908 > >>One flag per each plugin? I am mainly interested in the history plugin
909 > >>do you know which flag i need? where i can find a list of kopete flags?
910 > >>
911 > >>Thanks for your reply
912 > >>
913 > >>
914 > >
915 > >emerge -pv kde-base/kopete
916 > >
917 > >The history plugin is enabled with the 'history' USE flag.
918 > >
919 > >
920 > >
921 > Sorry for taking so long, just wanted to say it all worked perfectly
922 > except for the jingle flag which prevented kopete to build properly, i
923 > was not interested in such plugin though and got what i wanted anyway,
924 > thanks for your help
925 > --
926 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
927 >
928 > szerda 08 november 2006 15.18 dátummal Hemmann, Volker Armin ezt írta:
929 > > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote:
930 > > > Hi!
931 > > > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is
932 > > >
933 > > > finished:
934 > > > >>> Source compiled.
935 > > >
936 > > > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
937 > > > ---------------------------
938 > > > LOG FILE =
939 > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log"
940 > > >
941 > > > access_wr: /
942 > > >
943 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
944 > > >-----
945 > > >
946 > > > What does this mean?
947 > > >
948 > > > Thanks,
949 > > > István
950 > >
951 > > as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried to write outside of the sandbox
952 > and
953 > > got stopped. Read the log. Usually that means that something is broken.
954 > Try
955 > a
956 > > different pgp version - and don't disable sandbox. Disabling sanbox is
957 > evil.
958 >
959 > To tell the thruth, I don't know what sandbox is. I hasn't disabled it, or
960 > at
961 > least I don't know about it.
962 >
963 > The log says only: access_wr: /
964 >
965 > István
966 >
967 > --
968 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
969 >
970 > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:18, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
971 > > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote:
972 > > > Hi!
973 > > > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is
974 > > >
975 > > > finished:
976 > > > >>> Source compiled.
977 > > >
978 > > > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
979 > > > ---------------------------
980 > > > LOG FILE =
981 > > >
982 > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log"
983 > > >
984 > > > access_wr: /
985 > > >
986 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
987 > > >-- -----
988 > > >
989 > > > What does this mean?
990 > > >
991 > > > Thanks,
992 > > > István
993 > >
994 > > as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried to write outside of the sandbox
995 > > and got stopped. Read the log. Usually that means that something is
996 > broken.
997 > > Try a different pgp version - and don't disable sandbox. Disabling sanbox
998 > > is evil.
999 >
1000 > Actually the most likely cause is bug #101433 [1]. Which means he needs to
1001 > upgrade his sandbox:
1002 >
1003 > # FEATURES=-sandbox emerge --oneshot sandbox
1004 >
1005 > After that he should have no issues with emerging gnupg without disabling
1006 > sandbox.
1007 >
1008 > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101433
1009 >
1010 > --
1011 > Bo Andresen
1012 >
1013 >
1014 > Dale wrote:
1015 > > Daniel Iliev wrote:
1016 > >>
1017 > >>
1018 > >> When such a false positive arrives you could click "the spam button"
1019 > >> again (its tooltip should say "mark as not junk") this should fix the
1020 > >> problem.
1021 > >>
1022 > >>
1023 > >
1024 > > I have been doing that for some time now and it still marks them as
1025 > > spam. It is not always the same people but certain ones do get picked
1026 > > on a lot. It seems to get it by subject too I guess.
1027 > >
1028 > > Any ideas where this info is kept? I thought of unmerging and then
1029 > > cleaning out the directory and emerging it again. I'm not sure that
1030 > > will work either though.
1031 > >
1032 > > Dale
1033 > >
1034 > > :-) :-)
1035 >
1036 >
1037 > If you are ready to delete all your settings un-merging won't be needed.
1038 > Just close seamonkey and move/delete your mozilla-home folder. The next
1039 > time you start seamonkey it would appear as if it was just installed.
1040 >
1041 > for example:
1042 > mv ~/.mozilla ~/MOZILLA-BACK
1043 >
1044 >
1045 >
1046 > --
1047 > Best regards,
1048 > Daniel
1049 >
1050 >
1051 > --
1052 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1053 >
1054 > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:21:54 +0000, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
1055 >
1056 > > Sorry for taking so long, just wanted to say it all worked perfectly
1057 > > except for the jingle flag which prevented kopete to build properly, i
1058 > > was not interested in such plugin though and got what i wanted anyway,
1059 > > thanks for your help
1060 >
1061 > jingle apparently works as long as you do not have kdeenablefinal in USE.
1062 >
1063 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151089
1064 >
1065 >
1066 > --
1067 > Neil Bothwick
1068 >
1069 > Deja Moo: The feeling that you heard this bull somewhere before.
1070 >
1071 >
1072 > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 14:01, reader@×××××××.com wrote:
1073 > > > No it doesn't. It updates whatever has been updated since you last
1074 > > > ran it. This depends on the arch and USE flags you have, which
1075 > > > packages you have installed and when you last did it. it could
1076 > > > update two packages or two hundred. The point is, the statement
1077 > > > gives no indication of which packages you have upgraded, so it is
1078 > > > of no real help in diagnosing your problem.
1079 > >
1080 > > Here is meaningless:
1081 >
1082 > Reader, stop acting like a spoilt brat who needs to have the last say. I
1083 > really don't care how you define "meaningless", but your prattling on
1084 > about it, defending yourself, making yourself right and Neil wrong is
1085 > getting tiresome. Here's the real dope:
1086 >
1087 > You gave what you thought was useful information.
1088 > As it turns out, it wasn't. It's just fluff.
1089 > Neil told you it was fluff and he told you why.
1090 > Neil is trying to help you, he hasn't sent you an invoice for his time
1091 > and he's within his rights to tell you what format he wants information
1092 > in so he can continue to give you this free advice.
1093 >
1094 > Dude, it happens. Get over it.
1095 >
1096 > alan
1097 > --
1098 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1099 >
1100 > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 10:18, Marco Calviani wrote:
1101 > > Hi list,
1102 > > when trying to do an emerge world, the system tries to upgrade to
1103 > > imlib2-1.3.0 from version 1.2(something). But during the configure
1104 > > step, it comes to this error:
1105 > >
1106 > > [......]
1107 > > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar
1108 > > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib... i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib
1109 > > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip... i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip
1110 > > checking for correct ltmain.sh version... no
1111 > > configure: error:
1112 > >
1113 > > *** [Gentoo] sanity check failed! ***
1114 > > *** libtool.m4 and ltmain.sh have a version mismatch! ***
1115 > > *** (libtool.m4 = 1.5.22, ltmain.sh = "1.5.22 Debian 1.5.22-4") ***
1116 > >
1117 > > Please run:
1118 > >
1119 > > libtoolize --copy --force
1120 > >
1121 > > if appropriate, please contact the maintainer of this
1122 > > package (or your distribution) for help.
1123 > >
1124 > > make: *** [config.status] Error 1
1125 > >
1126 > > !!! ERROR: media-libs/imlib2-1.3.0 failed.
1127 > > Call stack:
1128 > > ebuild.sh, line 1546: Called dyn_compile
1129 > > ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile
1130 > > imlib2-1.3.0.ebuild, line 52: Called enlightenment_src_compile
1131 > > enlightenment.eclass, line 150: Called enlightenment_die 'emake
1132 > > failed' enlightenment.eclass, line 102: Called die
1133 > >
1134 > > !!! emake failed
1135 > > !!! SEND BUG REPORTS TO vapier@g.o NOT THE E TEAM
1136 > > !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
1137 > > stack if relevant.
1138 > >
1139 > > Is this a known error?
1140 >
1141 > I run e17 cvs version and I run into this a lot. Every time, running
1142 > libtoolize --copy --force like the script says fixes it. It's an
1143 > enlightenment bug, not a gentoo bug
1144 >
1145 > alan
1146 > --
1147 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1148 >
1149 > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:42, Greg Morin wrote:
1150 > > VIDEO_CARDS was/is set. The tweaking was in USE - 'png' was necessary
1151 > > before 'emerge cario'.
1152 >
1153 > Oh good, all's well that ends well.
1154 >
1155 > But I'm curious to know how the lack of the png USE flag to cairo caused
1156 > X to not load your video driver per the original error message. Or was
1157 > cairo just the last of several somewhat related things that had to be
1158 > remerged?
1159 >
1160 > alan
1161 > --
1162 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1163 >
1164 > szerda 08 november 2006 15.39 dátummal Bo Ørsted Andresen ezt írta:
1165 > > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:18, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
1166 > > > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote:
1167 > > > > Hi!
1168 > > > > I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation
1169 > is
1170 > > > >
1171 > > > > finished:
1172 > > > > >>> Source compiled.
1173 > > > >
1174 > > > > --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
1175 > > > > ---------------------------
1176 > > > > LOG FILE =
1177 > > > >
1178 > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log"
1179 > > > >
1180 > > > > access_wr: /
1181 > > > >
1182 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1183 > > > >-- -----
1184 > > > >
1185 > > > > What does this mean?
1186 > > > >
1187 > > > > Thanks,
1188 > > > > István
1189 > > >
1190 > > > as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried to write outside of the
1191 > sandbox
1192 > > > and got stopped. Read the log. Usually that means that something is
1193 > broken.
1194 > > > Try a different pgp version - and don't disable sandbox. Disabling
1195 > sanbox
1196 > > > is evil.
1197 > >
1198 > > Actually the most likely cause is bug #101433 [1]. Which means he needs to
1199 > > upgrade his sandbox:
1200 > >
1201 > > # FEATURES=-sandbox emerge --oneshot sandbox
1202 > >
1203 > > After that he should have no issues with emerging gnupg without disabling
1204 > > sandbox.
1205 > >
1206 > > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101433
1207 >
1208 > Thank you, it is solved the problem.
1209 >
1210 > Best regards,
1211 > István
1212 >
1213 > --
1214 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1215 >
1216 > Hi,
1217 >
1218 > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables stop
1219 > working.
1220 >
1221 > I get this error:
1222 >
1223 > # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre
1224 > getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory
1225 >
1226 > I have those modules loaded:
1227 >
1228 > # lsmod
1229 > Module Size Used by
1230 > iptable_filter 3968 0
1231 > ip_tables 14436 1 iptable_filter
1232 > x_tables 14980 1 ip_tables
1233 >
1234 > is there anything missing? It worked fine with old kernel...
1235 >
1236 > cheers!
1237 > --
1238 > Arnau Bria
1239 > http://blog.emergetux.net
1240 > Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou.
1241 > Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe.
1242 > Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas.
1243 > --
1244 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1245 >
1246 > Hi,
1247 >
1248 > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:31:20 +0100 Sergio Polini <sp_rm_it@×××××.it>
1249 > wrote:
1250 >
1251 > > [sp ~]$ aoss vmware &
1252 > > [2] 5598
1253 > > [sp ~]$ ERROR: ld.so: object 'libaoss.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
1254 > > preloaded: ignored.
1255 >
1256 > What are the permissions on *this* one (aoss32 seems not to be for you,
1257 > so /emul/linux/... isn't relevant), i.e. /usr/lib/libaoss.so (and the
1258 > file it points to in case it's a symlink)?
1259 >
1260 > You answered my last question about why you are mocking with "chmod +s"
1261 > with something along the lines of "I felt like I had to". What makes
1262 > you think you have to? Why should those libraries be set with setuid?
1263 >
1264 > -hwh
1265 > --
1266 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1267 >
1268 >
1269 > > Are there any readers of this list that still provide their own
1270 > > primary/secondary dns services? Or offer secondary services to
1271 > > others for a fee or free?
1272 > >
1273 > > I'm either a dinosaur or I have missed something fundamental on
1274 > > the evolution of DNS?
1275 > >
1276 >
1277 > http://www.easydns.com/secondarydns.php3
1278 >
1279 > http://www.secondarydns.ca/
1280 >
1281 > http://www.backupdns.com/index.html
1282 >
1283 > http://www.twisted4life.com/index.php
1284 >
1285 > http://soa.granitecanyon.com/
1286 >
1287 > If you're just looking for a place that will simply act as a slave NS
1288 > for your zones, give one of them a try.
1289 >
1290 > There used to be a few more services, and I was offering such services
1291 > at one point but the sheer volume of "plz set up mi DNS plz!!" noobs
1292 > became overwhelming.
1293 > --
1294 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1295 >
1296 > Hi,
1297 >
1298 > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:29:45 +0100 Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net>
1299 > wrote:
1300 >
1301 > > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables stop
1302 > > working.
1303 >
1304 > As iptables is very depending on the kernel's API, did you
1305 > - change kernel configuration?
1306 > - try re-emerging iptables?
1307 >
1308 > -hwh
1309 > --
1310 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1311 >
1312 > Perhaps try these modules as well?
1313 >
1314 > gentoo sbin # lsmod
1315 > Module Size Used by
1316 > xt_tcpudp 7936 1
1317 > iptable_nat 10756 1
1318 > ip_nat 21292 1 iptable_nat
1319 > ip_conntrack 51332 2 iptable_nat,ip_nat
1320 > iptable_filter 7296 0
1321 > ip_tables 22760 2 iptable_nat,iptable_filter
1322 > x_tables 18568 3 xt_tcpudp,iptable_nat,ip_tables
1323 >
1324 > Tim
1325 >
1326 > On 11/8/06, Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> wrote:
1327 > > Hi,
1328 > >
1329 > > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables stop
1330 > > working.
1331 > >
1332 > > I get this error:
1333 > >
1334 > > # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre
1335 > > getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory
1336 > >
1337 > > I have those modules loaded:
1338 > >
1339 > > # lsmod
1340 > > Module Size Used by
1341 > > iptable_filter 3968 0
1342 > > ip_tables 14436 1 iptable_filter
1343 > > x_tables 14980 1 ip_tables
1344 > >
1345 > > is there anything missing? It worked fine with old kernel...
1346 > >
1347 > > cheers!
1348 > > --
1349 > > Arnau Bria
1350 > > http://blog.emergetux.net
1351 > > Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou.
1352 > > Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe.
1353 > > Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas.
1354 > > --
1355 > > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1356 > >
1357 > >
1358 >
1359 >
1360 > Both parrot-0.4.6 & openoffice-2.0.4 (on AMD64) fail to run because they
1361 > are linked to *.so.34 versions of libraries in dev-libs/icu-3.4.1. The
1362 > current version is 3.6 with *.so.36 libraries.
1363 >
1364 > Is this a bug? If it is a bug, is it a bug against parrot & openoffice,
1365 > icu or portage?
1366 >
1367 > BTW, re-emerging parrot fixed parrot's problem, and I have 5 hours, 31
1368 > minutes and 40 seconds before I can tell you if it fixed openoffice's
1369 > problem (I'm assuming it will).
1370 >
1371 > --- Vladimir
1372 >
1373 > --
1374 > Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@×××××××.net>
1375 >
1376 > --
1377 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1378 >
1379 > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:16:20 +0100
1380 > Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
1381 >
1382 > > Hi,
1383 > >
1384 > > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:29:45 +0100 Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net>
1385 > > wrote:
1386 > >
1387 > > > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables
1388 > > > stop working.
1389 > >
1390 > > As iptables is very depending on the kernel's API, did you
1391 > > - change kernel configuration?
1392 >
1393 > nop. just make oldconfig with default values for new options.
1394 >
1395 > > - try re-emerging iptables?
1396 > nop, gonna do it.
1397 >
1398 > > -hwh
1399 > thanks!
1400 >
1401 > --
1402 > Arnau Bria
1403 > http://blog.emergetux.net
1404 > Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou.
1405 > Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe.
1406 > Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas.
1407 > --
1408 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1409 >
1410 > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:33:31 +0100
1411 > Arnau Bria wrote:
1412 >
1413 > > > As iptables is very depending on the kernel's API, did you
1414 > > > - change kernel configuration?
1415 > > nop. just make oldconfig with default values for new options.
1416 >
1417 > > > - try re-emerging iptables?
1418 > I've recompiled iptables and I still have same problem...
1419 >
1420 >
1421 > > > -hwh
1422 > thanks!
1423 >
1424 >
1425 > --
1426 > Arnau Bria
1427 > http://blog.emergetux.net
1428 > Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou.
1429 > Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe.
1430 > Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas.
1431 > --
1432 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1433 >
1434 > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:20:48 -0800
1435 > Tim Garton wrote:
1436 >
1437 > > Perhaps try these modules as well?
1438 > >
1439 > > gentoo sbin # lsmod
1440 > > Module Size Used by
1441 > > xt_tcpudp 7936 1
1442 > > iptable_nat 10756 1
1443 > > ip_nat 21292 1 iptable_nat
1444 > > ip_conntrack 51332 2 iptable_nat,ip_nat
1445 > > iptable_filter 7296 0
1446 > > ip_tables 22760 2 iptable_nat,iptable_filter
1447 > > x_tables 18568 3
1448 > xt_tcpudp,iptable_nat,ip_tables
1449 >
1450 > # lsmod
1451 > Module Size Used by
1452 > ip_conntrack 46112 0
1453 > xt_tcpudp 4096 0
1454 > xt_MARK 3328 0
1455 > iptable_filter 3968 0
1456 > ip_tables 14436 1 iptable_filter
1457 > x_tables 14980 3 xt_tcpudp,xt_MARK,ip_tables
1458 >
1459 > # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre
1460 > getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory
1461 >
1462 > (I don't use nat).
1463 >
1464 > Thanks for your reply.
1465 >
1466 > --
1467 > Arnau Bria
1468 > http://blog.emergetux.net
1469 > Wiggum: Dispara a las ruedas Lou.
1470 > Lou: eee, es un tanque jefe.
1471 > Wiggum: Me tienes hartito con todas tus excusas.
1472 > --
1473 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1474 >
1475 > On 11/7/06, Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> wrote:
1476 > >
1477 > > You seem to know enough about these matters already to make a sane
1478 > > judgement, so you probably already know that the real answer to your
1479 > > question is "it depends".
1480 > >
1481 > > Here's what I would do: pop along to your local store, preferably not
1482 > > one of the big chains, find the sanest sales guy with a clue and
1483 > > explain your problem. Don't listen to his recommendations, just ask if
1484 > > you can test his demo machines with the actual app in question. If it's
1485 > > an owner run store he probably say yes. Then test the thing for real
1486 > > and measure progress after 30 minutes or so. Buy the best performer.
1487 > >
1488 > > This will take a while, but at least you'll know for real which one
1489 > > suits your needs best
1490 > >
1491 > > alan
1492 >
1493 > Thanks Alan.
1494 >
1495 > The problem with running the neural network app is that it's a huge
1496 > install under Windows. It requires Internet access as it has a
1497 > hardware key that has to be validated against the specific machine.
1498 > Probably takes 1 hour just to set up. Then, once it's set up it takes
1499 > maybe 15 minutes to run a single solution on my older Athlon XP 1600+.
1500 > With that as background I'm sure you can understand that I'm not
1501 > anxious to do it more than once or twice.
1502 >
1503 > What I was hoping to do was find some basic way of comparing the
1504 > BogoMIPS on my old Athlon XP machine with BogoMIPS on some new
1505 > machines at the dealer. They haven't had any problems in the past with
1506 > me bringing in a LiveCD and booting Linux. If I could do this then I
1507 > might estimate that the new machine will run the same speed or will
1508 > run 3X the speed when doing these neural network jobs?
1509 >
1510 > Here's some info on the machines in my house today:
1511 >
1512 > 1) A 3GHz P4HT machine we use as a MythTV backend server and desktop
1513 > machine:
1514 >
1515 > processor : 0
1516 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
1517 > cpu family : 15
1518 > model : 3
1519 > model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
1520 > stepping : 3
1521 > cpu MHz : 2995.346
1522 > cache size : 1024 KB
1523 > <SNIP>
1524 > bogomips : 5996.11
1525 >
1526 > processor : 1
1527 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
1528 > cpu family : 15
1529 > model : 3
1530 > model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
1531 > stepping : 3
1532 > cpu MHz : 2995.346
1533 > cache size : 1024 KB
1534 > <SNIP>
1535 > bogomips : 5990.25
1536 >
1537 > 2) My son's AMD Compaq low cost machine:
1538 >
1539 > processor : 0
1540 > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
1541 > cpu family : 15
1542 > model : 47
1543 > model name : AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3200+
1544 > stepping : 2
1545 > cpu MHz : 1803.767
1546 > cache size : 256 KB
1547 > <SNIP>
1548 > bogomips : 3611.84
1549 >
1550 > 3) 1 of 2 Pundit-R's used as Myth frontend machines:
1551 >
1552 > processor : 0
1553 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
1554 > cpu family : 15
1555 > model : 3
1556 > model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.26GHz
1557 > stepping : 4
1558 > cpu MHz : 2261.847
1559 > cache size : 256 KB
1560 > <SNIP>
1561 > bogomips : 4526.57
1562 >
1563 >
1564 > 4) My AMD64 Gentoo machine is use daily:
1565 >
1566 > processor : 0
1567 > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
1568 > cpu family : 15
1569 > model : 47
1570 > model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
1571 > stepping : 0
1572 > cpu MHz : 1809.286
1573 > cache size : 512 KB
1574 > <SNIP>
1575 > bogomips : 3619.63
1576 >
1577 > 5) The current Athlon XP Windows machine is busy running Trading
1578 > Solutions but when in Linux I *think* it has a BogoMIPS spec around
1579 > 2800. No way to verify that right now.
1580 >
1581 > It's pretty boring but it seems that you can sort of double the CPU
1582 > MHz spec and come pretty close to the BogoMIPS numbers. However that
1583 > doesn't take cache size into account so maybe BogoMIPS isn't even the
1584 > right thing to be looking at.
1585 >
1586 > At the root of it all my questions are:
1587 >
1588 > 1) How representative are BogoMIPS in determining how fast a machine
1589 > will eventually be on compute bound apps?
1590 >
1591 > 2) Are there any good listings of BogoMIPS on different processor
1592 > types and speeds? (This is what I really want....)
1593 >
1594 > 3) Do BogoMIPS include FPU measurements in case that is important for my
1595 > app?
1596 >
1597 > 4) How well do BogoMIPS translate to the same machine when it runs Win XP?
1598 >
1599 > Anyway, thanks very much for your answers. I appreciate the help even
1600 > if it isn't primarily about running Gentoo. I suspect there are others
1601 > out there that have to dual boot. Maybe this will help someone in the
1602 > future with similar questions.
1603 >
1604 > Cheers,
1605 > Mark
1606 > --
1607 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1608 >
1609 > Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
1610 > Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
1611 > by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8H3obl010931
1612 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:50 GMT
1613 > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
1614 > by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DFF64442
1615 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:49 +0000
1616 > (UTC)
1617 > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
1618 > X-Spam-Score: -2.507
1619 > X-Spam-Level:
1620 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.507 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.092,
1621 > BAYES_00=-2.599]
1622 > Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
1623 > by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
1624 > with ESMTP id UE4XhIw1U6yT for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>;
1625 > Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
1626 > Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
1627 > (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
1628 > (No client certificate requested)
1629 > by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009F0643C0
1630 > for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
1631 > Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
1632 > id 1Ghqpd-0000Ty-43
1633 > for gentoo-user@g.o; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:03:21 +0100
1634 > Received: from dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net
1635 > ([84.61.158.233])
1636 > by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
1637 > id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
1638 > for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:03:21 +0100
1639 > Received: from skoehler by
1640 > dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim
1641 > 0.1 (Debian))
1642 > id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
1643 > for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:03:21 +0100
1644 > X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
1645 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
1646 > From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= <skoehler@×××.de>
1647 > Subject: [gentoo-user] switched from SiS to VIA chipset -> vesa framebuffer
1648 > broken
1649 > Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:03:00 +0100
1650 > Lines: 45
1651 > Message-ID: <eit2k6$uie$1@×××××××××.org>
1652 > Precedence: bulk
1653 > List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
1654 > List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o>
1655 > List-Unsubscribe:
1656 > <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o>
1657 > List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o>
1658 > List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
1659 > X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o
1660 > Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o
1661 > Mime-Version: 1.0
1662 > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
1663 > protocol="application/pgp-signature";
1664 > boundary="------------enig9098F5707E46C5B0E9C64574"
1665 > X-Complaints-To: usenet@×××××××××.org
1666 > X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:
1667 > dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net
1668 > User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
1669 > X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1
1670 > Sender: news <news@×××××××××.org>
1671 >
1672 > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
1673 > --------------enig9098F5707E46C5B0E9C64574
1674 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
1675 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
1676 >
1677 > Hi,
1678 >
1679 > this is a really strange issue i'm having:
1680 >
1681 > i changed the motherboard, nothing else. I know have a K8T800Pro based
1682 > motherboard. The old one was SiS-chipset based.
1683 >
1684 > So i was already running the vesa frambuffer at 1280x1024, 16-bit. And
1685 > actually it worked perfect!
1686 >
1687 > No, after the switch to the VIA-chipset based Motherboard, i don't see
1688 > the text that's printed to the screen. The resulition is switched, but
1689 > the upper half of the screen stays black. When the text reaches the
1690 > lower half, then i see the text, and then we come to the point, where
1691 > the consolefont is set. And guess what:
1692 >
1693 > then suddenly everything works. I can see the text on the whole screen
1694 > and so on.
1695 >
1696 >
1697 > So something is wrong here.
1698 >
1699 > Any clue, how i might fix it?
1700 >
1701 >
1702 > --------------enig9098F5707E46C5B0E9C64574
1703 > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
1704 > Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1705 > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
1706 >
1707 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1708 > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
1709 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1710 >
1711 > iD8DBQFFUg3E7Ww7FjRBE4ARAiqHAJ9NvF/T5E06G2FKYVWi3lfOwy2InACgyBU8
1712 > 7zZW0SONQ/Ja6GHX+dn8Xfo=
1713 > =DRRB
1714 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1715 >
1716 > --------------enig9098F5707E46C5B0E9C64574--
1717 >
1718 > --
1719 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1720 > --658509eb2ccd8f6
1721 > Content-Type: message/rfc822
1722 > Content-Disposition: inline;
1723 > filename="gentoo-user_54470.eml"
1724 >
1725 > Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
1726 > Received: from gimli.home.gaima.co.uk (brad.comodogroup.com [82.109.38.202])
1727 > by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8H9qJl023234
1728 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:09:53 GMT
1729 > Received: (qmail 17699 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 17:09:51 +0000
1730 > Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
1731 > by localhost with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 17:09:51 +0000
1732 > From: Mike Williams <mike@××××××××.uk>
1733 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
1734 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iptables error
1735 > Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:09:47 +0000
1736 > User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4
1737 > References: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es>
1738 > In-Reply-To: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es>
1739 > Precedence: bulk
1740 > List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
1741 > List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o>
1742 > List-Unsubscribe:
1743 > <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o>
1744 > List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o>
1745 > List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
1746 > X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o
1747 > Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o
1748 > MIME-Version: 1.0
1749 > Content-Type: text/plain;
1750 > charset="iso-8859-1"
1751 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
1752 > Content-Disposition: inline
1753 > Message-Id: <200611081709.48647.mike@××××××××.uk>
1754 >
1755 > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:29, Arnau Bria wrote:
1756 > > I get this error:
1757 > >
1758 > > # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre
1759 > > getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory
1760 >
1761 > Whenever I get errors like these my first step is to run the command under
1762 > strace, then follow the reams of output backwards to find the file or
1763 > directory it's looking for.
1764 >
1765 > # emerge strace
1766 > # strace iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre
1767 >
1768 > Not quite sure how it will react to the redirection.
1769 >
1770 > --
1771 > Mike Williams
1772 > --
1773 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
1774 > --658509eb2ccd8f6
1775 > Content-Type: message/rfc822
1776 > Content-Disposition: inline;
1777 > filename="gentoo-user_54471.eml"
1778 >
1779 > Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
1780 > Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com
1781 > [64.233.162.206])
1782 > by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HF6Qf004491
1783 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:15:07 GMT
1784 > Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 9so2050995nzo
1785 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:15:06 -0800
1786 > (PST)
1787 > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
1788 > s=beta; d=gmail.com;
1789 >
1790 > h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
1791 >
1792 > b=p159QkNWx/ds1VsLoFDxB/apzcL9a56vZKmX9DNzPPTf5LCb3GDSO8EdMrExCggW7AJJIKPyeNUtcoUU7GFai1K2t2gf67WygMKLWFrUIOrEl+UMmQ+JRlNKP6nv38hyvtNzIOZTztKbbqO0Nb5tQIwUnLwTCOrXr3MYZ4ompVs=
1793 > Received: by 10.65.242.10 with SMTP id u10mr12568383qbr.1163006106124;
1794 > Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:15:06 -0800 (PST)
1795 > Received: by 10.65.183.9 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:15:06 -0800 (PST)
1796 > Message-ID:
1797 > <4df051c10611080915l3095aaacs59ced9bcb455db54@××××××××××.com>
1798 > Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:15:06 -0500
1799 > From: Erik <mistereastenstream@×××××.com>
1800 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
1801 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] X crashes randomly
1802 > In-Reply-To:
1803 > <4df051c10611071314w243d76cetce2774378744d270@××××××××××.com>
1804 > Precedence: bulk
1805 > List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
1806 > List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o>
1807 > List-Unsubscribe:
1808 > <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o>
1809 > List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o>
1810 > List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
1811 > X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o
1812 > Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o
1813 > MIME-Version: 1.0
1814 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
1815 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
1816 > Content-Disposition: inline
1817 > References:
1818 > <4df051c10611061937v50abb1f5l6da4a3e2f4aaf25@××××××××××.com>
1819 > <200611071539.49300.4ndrey@×××××.com>
1820 >
1821 > <4df051c10611071314w243d76cetce2774378744d270@××××××××××.com>
1822 >
1823 > Well, it seems it was but a temporary glitch, because I haven't had
1824 > this problem occur anymore. Thanks to everybody for their input.
1825 >
1826 > On 11/7/06, Erik <mistereastenstream@×××××.com> wrote:
1827 > > I tried revdep-rebuild; nothing was broken so nothing was built.
1828 > >
1829 > > And no, I don't have any developer packages installed. I use stable X
1830 > > that employs AIGLX and composite with stable nvidia drivers, and a
1831 > > stable kde that uses transparencies. I've been using Xorg-x11 7.1
1832 > > ever since it was marked stable, and I've had no problems until
1833 > > yesterday. I literally sent this email not 1 hour after my problems
1834 > > started and I couldn't find anything on bugzilla.
1835 > >
1836 > > On 11/7/06, Andrey <4ndrey@×××××.com> wrote:
1837 > > > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 03:37, Erik wrote:
1838 > > > > Hello,
1839 > > > > Starting today, X has been acting a little strange for me. I'll be
1840 > > > > doing nothing to spectacularer in kde, like typing in openoffice or
1841 > > > > something else like that, and all of the sudden, X restarts and I am
1842 > > > > faced with kdm. I don't know if this is a problem with something in
1843 > > > > kde, kdm, or X, so I don't know where to file a bug. I haven't really
1844 > > > > seen anything related to what I am dealing with in those places so
1845 > > > > far.
1846 > > >
1847 > > > > and, the tail end of /var/log/kdm.log:
1848 > > >
1849 > > > What about /var/log/Xorg.0.log ?
1850 > > That showed no errors at all, but I can post it anyway:
1851 > >
1852 > --------------------------------------------------------------
1853 > >
1854 > > X Window System Version 7.1.1
1855 > > Release Date: 12 May 2006
1856 > > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1
1857 > > Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 x86_64
1858 > > Current Operating System: Linux erikstotle 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 #11 SMP
1859 > > Mon Oct 9 21:19:04 EDT 2006 x86_64
1860 > > Build Date: 14 October 2006
1861 > > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
1862 > > to make sure that you have the latest version.
1863 > > Module Loader present
1864 > > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
1865 > > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
1866 > > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
1867 > > (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Nov 7 07:19:49 2006
1868 > > (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
1869 > > (==) ServerLayout "X.org Configured"
1870 > > (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0)
1871 > > (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0"
1872 > > (**) | |-->Device "Card0"
1873 > > (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0"
1874 > > (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0"
1875 > > (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/TTF/" does not exist.
1876 > > Entry deleted from font path.
1877 > > (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/OTF" does not exist.
1878 > > Entry deleted from font path.
1879 > > (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/CID/" does not exist.
1880 > > Entry deleted from font path.
1881 > > (**) FontPath set to:
1882 > > /usr/share/fonts/misc/,
1883 > > /usr/share/fonts/Type1/,
1884 > > /usr/share/fonts/100dpi/,
1885 > > /usr/share/fonts/75dpi/
1886 > > (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/share/X11/rgb"
1887 > > (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules"
1888 > > (**) Extension "Composite" is enabled
1889 > > (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory)
1890 > > (II) No APM support in BIOS or kernel
1891 > > (II) Module ABI versions:
1892 > > X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3
1893 > > X.Org Video Driver: 1.0
1894 > > X.Org XInput driver : 0.6
1895 > > X.Org Server Extension : 0.3
1896 > > X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5
1897 > > (II) Loader running on linux
1898 > > (II) LoadModule: "bitmap"
1899 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/fonts/libbitmap.so
1900 > > (II) Module bitmap: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
1901 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
1902 > > Module class: X.Org Font Renderer
1903 > > ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5
1904 > > (II) Loading font Bitmap
1905 > > (II) LoadModule: "pcidata"
1906 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libpcidata.so
1907 > > (II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
1908 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
1909 > > ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.0
1910 > > (++) using VT number 7
1911 > >
1912 > > (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
1913 > > (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 10de,02f0 card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1914 > 80
1915 > > (II) PCI: 00:00:1: chip 10de,02fa card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1916 > 80
1917 > > (II) PCI: 00:00:2: chip 10de,02fe card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1918 > 80
1919 > > (II) PCI: 00:00:3: chip 10de,02f8 card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1920 > 80
1921 > > (II) PCI: 00:00:4: chip 10de,02f9 card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1922 > 00
1923 > > (II) PCI: 00:00:5: chip 10de,02ff card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1924 > 80
1925 > > (II) PCI: 00:00:6: chip 10de,027f card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1926 > 80
1927 > > (II) PCI: 00:00:7: chip 10de,027e card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1928 > 80
1929 > > (II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 10de,02fc card 0000,0000 rev a1 class 06,04,00 hdr
1930 > 01
1931 > > (II) PCI: 00:03:0: chip 10de,02fd card 0000,0000 rev a1 class 06,04,00 hdr
1932 > 01
1933 > > (II) PCI: 00:04:0: chip 10de,02fb card 0000,0000 rev a1 class 06,04,00 hdr
1934 > 01
1935 > > (II) PCI: 00:05:0: chip 10de,0240 card 1043,81cd rev a2 class 03,00,00 hdr
1936 > 00
1937 > > (II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 10de,0270 card 1043,81c0 rev a2 class 05,00,00 hdr
1938 > 00
1939 > > (II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 10de,0260 card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 06,01,00 hdr
1940 > 80
1941 > > (II) PCI: 00:0a:1: chip 10de,0264 card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 0c,05,00 hdr
1942 > 80
1943 > > (II) PCI: 00:0a:2: chip 10de,0272 card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 05,00,00 hdr
1944 > 80
1945 > > (II) PCI: 00:0b:0: chip 10de,026d card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 0c,03,10 hdr
1946 > 80
1947 > > (II) PCI: 00:0b:1: chip 10de,026e card 1043,81c0 rev a3 class 0c,03,20 hdr
1948 > 80
1949 > > (II) PCI: 00:0d:0: chip 10de,0265 card 1043,81c0 rev a1 class 01,01,8a hdr
1950 > 00
1951 > > (II) PCI: 00:0e:0: chip 10de,0266 card 1043,81c0 rev a1 class 01,01,85 hdr
1952 > 00
1953 > > (II) PCI: 00:0f:0: chip 10de,0267 card 1043,81c0 rev a1 class 01,01,85 hdr
1954 > 00
1955 > > (II) PCI: 00:10:0: chip 10de,026f card 0000,0000 rev a2 class 06,04,01 hdr
1956 > 81
1957 > > (II) PCI: 00:10:1: chip 10de,026c card 1043,81cb rev a2 class 04,03,00 hdr
1958 > 80
1959 > > (II) PCI: 00:14:0: chip 10de,0269 card 1043,816a rev a3 class 06,80,00 hdr
1960 > 00
1961 > > (II) PCI: 00:18:0: chip 1022,1100 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr
1962 > 80
1963 > > (II) PCI: 00:18:1: chip 1022,1101 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr
1964 > 80
1965 > > (II) PCI: 00:18:2: chip 1022,1102 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr
1966 > 80
1967 > > (II) PCI: 00:18:3: chip 1022,1103 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr
1968 > 80
1969 > > (II) PCI: 04:05:0: chip 104c,8023 card 1043,808b rev 00 class 0c,00,10 hdr
1970 > 00
1971 > > (II) PCI: 04:09:0: chip 1319,0801 card 1319,1319 rev b2 class 04,01,00 hdr
1972 > 80
1973 > > (II) PCI: 04:09:1: chip 1319,0802 card 1319,1319 rev b2 class 09,80,00 hdr
1974 > 80
1975 > > (II) PCI: End of PCI scan
1976 > > (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge:
1977 > > (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:2:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x0000 (VGA_EN is
1978 > cleared)
1979 > > (II) Bus 1 I/O range:
1980 > > [0] -1 0 0x0000d000 - 0x0000dfff (0x1000) IX[B]
1981 > > (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range:
1982 > > [0] -1 0 0xfd800000 - 0xfd8fffff (0x100000) MX[B]
1983 > > (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range:
1984 > > [0] -1 0 0xfd700000 - 0xfd7fffff (0x100000) MX[B]
1985 > > (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge:
1986 > > (II) Bus 2: bridge is at (0:3:0), (0,2,2), BCTRL: 0x0000 (VGA_EN is
1987 > cleared)
1988 > > (II) Bus 2 I/O range:
1989 > > [0] -1 0 0x0000b000 - 0x0000bfff (0x1000) IX[B]
1990 > > (II) Bus 2 non-prefetchable memory range:
1991 > > [0] -1 0 0xfde00000 - 0xfdefffff (0x100000) MX[B]
1992 > > (II) Bus 2 prefetchable memory range:
1993 > > [0] -1 0 0xfdd00000 - 0xfddfffff (0x100000) MX[B]
1994 > > (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge:
1995 > > (II) Bus 3: bridge is at (0:4:0), (0,3,3), BCTRL: 0x0000 (VGA_EN is
1996 > cleared)
1997 > > (II) Bus 3 I/O range:
1998 > > [0] -1 0 0x0000e000 - 0x0000efff (0x1000) IX[B]
1999 > > (II) Bus 3 non-prefetchable memory range:
2000 > > [0] -1 0 0xfdc00000 - 0xfdcfffff (0x100000) MX[B]
2001 > > (II) Bus 3 prefetchable memory range:
2002 > > [0] -1 0 0xfd900000 - 0xfd9fffff (0x100000) MX[B]
2003 > > (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge:
2004 > > (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:10:0), (0,-1,-1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is
2005 > set)
2006 > > (II) Subtractive PCI-to-PCI bridge:
2007 > > (II) Bus 4: bridge is at (0:16:0), (0,4,4), BCTRL: 0x0200 (VGA_EN is
2008 > cleared)
2009 > > (II) Bus 4 I/O range:
2010 > > [0] -1 0 0x0000c000 - 0x0000cfff (0x1000) IX[B]
2011 > > (II) Bus 4 non-prefetchable memory range:
2012 > > [0] -1 0 0xfdb00000 - 0xfdbfffff (0x100000) MX[B]
2013 > > (II) Bus 4 prefetchable memory range:
2014 > > [0] -1 0 0xfda00000 - 0xfdafffff (0x100000) MX[B]
2015 > > (II) Host-to-PCI bridge:
2016 > > (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:24:0), (0,0,4), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set)
2017 > > (II) Bus 0 I/O range:
2018 > > [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B]
2019 > > (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range:
2020 > > [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[B]
2021 > > (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range:
2022 > > [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[B]
2023 > > (--) PCI:*(0:5:0) nVidia Corporation C51PV [GeForce 6150] rev 162, Mem
2024 > > @ 0xfc000000/24, 0xe0000000/28, 0xfb000000/24
2025 > > (II) Addressable bus resource ranges are
2026 > > [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[B]
2027 > > [1] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B]
2028 > > (II) OS-reported resource ranges:
2029 > > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
2030 > > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
2031 > > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
2032 > > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
2033 > > [4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B]
2034 > > [5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B]
2035 > > (II) Active PCI resource ranges:
2036 > > [0] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B]
2037 > > [1] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B]
2038 > > [2] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2039 > > [3] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B]
2040 > > [4] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2041 > > [5] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2042 > > [6] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B]
2043 > > [7] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B]
2044 > > [8] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2045 > > [9] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B)
2046 > > [10] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2047 > > [11] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B]
2048 > > [12] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B]
2049 > > [13] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B]
2050 > > [14] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B]
2051 > > [15] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B]
2052 > > [16] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B]
2053 > > [17] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B]
2054 > > [18] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B]
2055 > > [19] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B]
2056 > > [20] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B]
2057 > > [21] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B]
2058 > > [22] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B]
2059 > > [23] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B]
2060 > > [24] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B]
2061 > > [25] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B]
2062 > > [26] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B]
2063 > > (II) Active PCI resource ranges after removing overlaps:
2064 > > [0] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B]
2065 > > [1] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B]
2066 > > [2] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2067 > > [3] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B]
2068 > > [4] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2069 > > [5] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2070 > > [6] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B]
2071 > > [7] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B]
2072 > > [8] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2073 > > [9] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B)
2074 > > [10] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2075 > > [11] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B]
2076 > > [12] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B]
2077 > > [13] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B]
2078 > > [14] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B]
2079 > > [15] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B]
2080 > > [16] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B]
2081 > > [17] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B]
2082 > > [18] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B]
2083 > > [19] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B]
2084 > > [20] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B]
2085 > > [21] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B]
2086 > > [22] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B]
2087 > > [23] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B]
2088 > > [24] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B]
2089 > > [25] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B]
2090 > > [26] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B]
2091 > > (II) OS-reported resource ranges after removing overlaps with PCI:
2092 > > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
2093 > > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
2094 > > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
2095 > > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
2096 > > [4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B]
2097 > > [5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B]
2098 > > (II) All system resource ranges:
2099 > > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
2100 > > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
2101 > > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
2102 > > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
2103 > > [4] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B]
2104 > > [5] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B]
2105 > > [6] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2106 > > [7] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B]
2107 > > [8] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2108 > > [9] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2109 > > [10] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B]
2110 > > [11] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B]
2111 > > [12] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2112 > > [13] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B)
2113 > > [14] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2114 > > [15] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B]
2115 > > [16] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B]
2116 > > [17] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B]
2117 > > [18] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B]
2118 > > [19] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B]
2119 > > [20] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B]
2120 > > [21] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B]
2121 > > [22] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B]
2122 > > [23] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B]
2123 > > [24] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B]
2124 > > [25] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B]
2125 > > [26] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B]
2126 > > [27] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B]
2127 > > [28] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B]
2128 > > [29] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B]
2129 > > [30] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B]
2130 > > [31] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B]
2131 > > [32] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B]
2132 > > (II) LoadModule: "extmod"
2133 > > (II) Loading
2134 > /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libextmod.so
2135 > > (II) Module extmod: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2136 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
2137 > > Module class: X.Org Server Extension
2138 > > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3
2139 > > (II) Loading extension SHAPE
2140 > > (II) Loading extension MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD
2141 > > (II) Loading extension BIG-REQUESTS
2142 > > (II) Loading extension SYNC
2143 > > (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
2144 > > (II) Loading extension XC-MISC
2145 > > (II) Loading extension XFree86-VidModeExtension
2146 > > (II) Loading extension XFree86-Misc
2147 > > (II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA
2148 > > (II) Loading extension DPMS
2149 > > (II) Loading extension TOG-CUP
2150 > > (II) Loading extension Extended-Visual-Information
2151 > > (II) Loading extension XVideo
2152 > > (II) Loading extension XVideo-MotionCompensation
2153 > > (II) Loading extension X-Resource
2154 > > (II) LoadModule: "dbe"
2155 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libdbe.so
2156 > > (II) Module dbe: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2157 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
2158 > > Module class: X.Org Server Extension
2159 > > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3
2160 > > (II) Loading extension DOUBLE-BUFFER
2161 > > (II) LoadModule: "record"
2162 > > (II) Loading
2163 > /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/librecord.so
2164 > > (II) Module record: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2165 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.13.0
2166 > > Module class: X.Org Server Extension
2167 > > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3
2168 > > (II) Loading extension RECORD
2169 > > (II) LoadModule: "xtrap"
2170 > > (II) Loading
2171 > /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libxtrap.so
2172 > > (II) Module xtrap: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2173 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
2174 > > Module class: X.Org Server Extension
2175 > > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3
2176 > > (II) Loading extension DEC-XTRAP
2177 > > (II) LoadModule: "glx"
2178 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
2179 > > (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
2180 > > compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.8776
2181 > > Module class: X.Org Server Extension
2182 > > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.1
2183 > > (II) Loading extension GLX
2184 > > (II) LoadModule: "freetype"
2185 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/fonts/libfreetype.so
2186 > > (II) Module freetype: vendor="X.Org Foundation & the After X-TT Project"
2187 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 2.1.0
2188 > > Module class: X.Org Font Renderer
2189 > > ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5
2190 > > (II) Loading font FreeType
2191 > > (II) LoadModule: "type1"
2192 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so
2193 > > (II) Module type1: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2194 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.2
2195 > > Module class: X.Org Font Renderer
2196 > > ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5
2197 > > (II) Loading font Type1
2198 > > (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
2199 > > (II) Loading
2200 > /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
2201 > > (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
2202 > > compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.8776
2203 > > Module class: X.Org Video Driver
2204 > > (II) LoadModule: "mouse"
2205 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so
2206 > > (II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2207 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.1.1
2208 > > Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
2209 > > ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.6
2210 > > (II) LoadModule: "kbd"
2211 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/input/kbd_drv.so
2212 > > (II) Module kbd: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2213 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.1.0
2214 > > Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
2215 > > ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.6
2216 > > (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 1.0-8776 Mon Oct 16 21:55:22 PDT 2006
2217 > > (II) NVIDIA Unified Driver for all Supported NVIDIA GPUs
2218 > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0
2219 > > (--) Chipset NVIDIA GPU found
2220 > > (II) Loading sub module "fb"
2221 > > (II) LoadModule: "fb"
2222 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfb.so
2223 > > (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2224 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
2225 > > ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.3
2226 > > (II) Loading sub module "ramdac"
2227 > > (II) LoadModule: "ramdac"
2228 > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libramdac.so
2229 > > (II) Module ramdac: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
2230 > > compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 0.1.0
2231 > > ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.0
2232 > > (II) resource ranges after xf86ClaimFixedResources() call:
2233 > > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
2234 > > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
2235 > > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
2236 > > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
2237 > > [4] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B]
2238 > > [5] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B]
2239 > > [6] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2240 > > [7] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B]
2241 > > [8] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2242 > > [9] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2243 > > [10] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B]
2244 > > [11] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B]
2245 > > [12] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2246 > > [13] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B)
2247 > > [14] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2248 > > [15] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B]
2249 > > [16] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B]
2250 > > [17] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B]
2251 > > [18] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B]
2252 > > [19] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B]
2253 > > [20] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B]
2254 > > [21] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B]
2255 > > [22] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B]
2256 > > [23] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B]
2257 > > [24] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B]
2258 > > [25] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B]
2259 > > [26] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B]
2260 > > [27] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B]
2261 > > [28] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B]
2262 > > [29] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B]
2263 > > [30] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B]
2264 > > [31] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B]
2265 > > [32] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B]
2266 > > (II) resource ranges after probing:
2267 > > [0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
2268 > > [1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
2269 > > [2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
2270 > > [3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
2271 > > [4] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B]
2272 > > [5] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B]
2273 > > [6] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2274 > > [7] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B]
2275 > > [8] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2276 > > [9] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2277 > > [10] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B]
2278 > > [11] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B]
2279 > > [12] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2280 > > [13] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B)
2281 > > [14] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2282 > > [15] 0 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B]
2283 > > [16] 0 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B]
2284 > > [17] 0 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B]
2285 > > [18] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B]
2286 > > [19] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B]
2287 > > [20] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B]
2288 > > [21] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B]
2289 > > [22] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B]
2290 > > [23] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B]
2291 > > [24] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B]
2292 > > [25] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B]
2293 > > [26] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B]
2294 > > [27] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B]
2295 > > [28] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B]
2296 > > [29] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B]
2297 > > [30] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B]
2298 > > [31] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B]
2299 > > [32] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B]
2300 > > [33] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B]
2301 > > [34] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B]
2302 > > [35] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B]
2303 > > [36] 0 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B]
2304 > > [37] 0 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B]
2305 > > (II) Setting vga for screen 0.
2306 > > (==) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32
2307 > > (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888
2308 > > (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
2309 > > (==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
2310 > > (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "RenderAccel" "true"
2311 > > (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "true"
2312 > > (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "AddARGBGLXVisuals" "true"
2313 > > (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling RENDER acceleration
2314 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Support for GLX with the Damage and Composite X extensions
2315 > is
2316 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): enabled.
2317 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce 6150 at PCI:0:5:0
2318 > > (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoRAM: 524288 kBytes
2319 > > (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 05.51.22.33.07
2320 > > (--) NVIDIA(0): Interlaced video modes are supported on this GPU
2321 > > (--) NVIDIA(0): Connected display device(s) on GeForce 6150 at PCI:0:5:0:
2322 > > (--) NVIDIA(0): Samsung (CRT-0)
2323 > > (--) NVIDIA(0): Samsung (CRT-0): 350.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
2324 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: CRT-0
2325 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes:
2326 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768"
2327 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768
2328 > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No size information available in CRT-0's EDID; cannot
2329 > compute
2330 > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): DPI from EDID.
2331 > > (==) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (75, 75); computed from built-in default
2332 > > (--) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
2333 > > (II) do I need RAC? No, I don't.
2334 > > (II) resource ranges after preInit:
2335 > > [0] 0 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]
2336 > > [1] 0 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B]
2337 > > [2] 0 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]
2338 > > [3] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
2339 > > [4] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
2340 > > [5] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
2341 > > [6] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
2342 > > [7] -1 0 0xfdbf8000 - 0xfdbfbfff (0x4000) MX[B]
2343 > > [8] -1 0 0xfdbff000 - 0xfdbff7ff (0x800) MX[B]
2344 > > [9] -1 0 0xfe02b000 - 0xfe02bfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2345 > > [10] -1 0 0xfe024000 - 0xfe027fff (0x4000) MX[B]
2346 > > [11] -1 0 0xfe02c000 - 0xfe02cfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2347 > > [12] -1 0 0xfe02d000 - 0xfe02dfff (0x1000) MX[B]
2348 > > [13] -1 0 0xfe02e000 - 0xfe02e0ff (0x100) MX[B]
2349 > > [14] -1 0 0xfe02f000 - 0xfe02ffff (0x1000) MX[B]
2350 > > [15] -1 0 0xfb000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2351 > > [16] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B)
2352 > > [17] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B)
2353 > > [18] 0 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B](OprD)
2354 > > [19] 0 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B](OprD)
2355 > > [20] 0 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B](OprD)
2356 > > [21] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B]
2357 > > [22] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B]
2358 > > [23] -1 0 0x0000cc00 - 0x0000cc0f (0x10) IX[B]
2359 > > [24] -1 0 0x0000ce00 - 0x0000ce7f (0x80) IX[B]
2360 > > [25] -1 0 0x0000f200 - 0x0000f207 (0x8) IX[B]
2361 > > [26] -1 0 0x0000f300 - 0x0000f30f (0x10) IX[B]
2362 > > [27] -1 0 0x00000b60 - 0x00000b63 (0x4) IX[B]
2363 > > [28] -1 0 0x00000960 - 0x00000967 (0x8) IX[B]
2364 > > [29] -1 0 0x00000be0 - 0x00000be3 (0x4) IX[B]
2365 > > [30] -1 0 0x000009e0 - 0x000009e7 (0x8) IX[B]
2366 > > [31] -1 0 0x0000f800 - 0x0000f80f (0x10) IX[B]
2367 > > [32] -1 0 0x00000b70 - 0x00000b73 (0x4) IX[B]
2368 > > [33] -1 0 0x00000970 - 0x00000977 (0x8) IX[B]
2369 > > [34] -1 0 0x00000bf0 - 0x00000bf3 (0x4) IX[B]
2370 > > [35] -1 0 0x000009f0 - 0x000009f7 (0x8) IX[B]
2371 > > [36] -1 0 0x0000fd00 - 0x0000fd0f (0x10) IX[B]
2372 > > [37] -1 0 0x00004c40 - 0x00004c7f (0x40) IX[B]
2373 > > [38] -1 0 0x00004c00 - 0x00004c3f (0x40) IX[B]
2374 > > [39] 0 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B](OprU)
2375 > > [40] 0 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B](OprU)
2376 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "1024x768"
2377 > > (II) Loading extension NV-GLX
2378 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA 3D Acceleration Architecture Initialized
2379 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Using the NVIDIA 2D acceleration architecture
2380 > > (==) NVIDIA(0): Backing store disabled
2381 > > (==) NVIDIA(0): Silken mouse enabled
2382 > > (**) Option "dpms"
2383 > > (**) NVIDIA(0): DPMS enabled
2384 > > (II) Loading extension NV-CONTROL
2385 > > (==) RandR enabled
2386 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM
2387 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension
2388 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension XTEST
2389 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD
2390 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension XC-APPGROUP
2391 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension SECURITY
2392 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA
2393 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension XFIXES
2394 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension XFree86-Bigfont
2395 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension RENDER
2396 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension RANDR
2397 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension COMPOSITE
2398 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension DAMAGE
2399 > > (II) Initializing built-in extension XEVIE
2400 > > (II) Initializing extension GLX
2401 > > (**) Option "Protocol" "auto"
2402 > > (**) Mouse0: Device: "/dev/psaux"
2403 > > (**) Mouse0: Protocol: "auto"
2404 > > (**) Option "CorePointer"
2405 > > (**) Mouse0: Core Pointer
2406 > > (**) Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
2407 > > (==) Mouse0: Emulate3Buttons, Emulate3Timeout: 50
2408 > > (**) Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
2409 > > (**) Mouse0: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4, 5, 6 and 7
2410 > > (**) Mouse0: Buttons: 11
2411 > > (**) Option "CoreKeyboard"
2412 > > (**) Keyboard0: Core Keyboard
2413 > > (**) Option "Protocol" "standard"
2414 > > (**) Keyboard0: Protocol: standard
2415 > > (**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30"
2416 > > (**) Option "XkbRules" "xorg"
2417 > > (**) Keyboard0: XkbRules: "xorg"
2418 > > (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
2419 > > (**) Keyboard0: XkbModel: "pc105"
2420 > > (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us"
2421 > > (**) Keyboard0: XkbLayout: "us"
2422 > > (**) Option "CustomKeycodes" "off"
2423 > > (**) Keyboard0: CustomKeycodes disabled
2424 > > (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Keyboard0" (type: KEYBOARD)
2425 > > (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Mouse0" (type: MOUSE)
2426 > > (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "NVIDIA Event Handler" (type:
2427 > Other)
2428 > > xkb_keycodes { include "xfree86+aliases(qwerty)" };
2429 > > xkb_types { include "complete" };
2430 > > xkb_compatibility { include "complete" };
2431 > > xkb_symbols { include "pc(pc105)+us" };
2432 > > xkb_geometry { include "pc(pc105)" };
2433 > > (--) Mouse0: PnP-detected protocol: "ExplorerPS/2"
2434 > > (II) Mouse0: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded
2435 > > SetClientVersion: 0 9
2436 > > SetGrabKeysState - disabled
2437 > > SetGrabKeysState - enabled
2438 > > FreeFontPath: FPE "/usr/share/fonts/misc/" refcount is 3, should be 1;
2439 > fixing.
2440 > > (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory)
2441 > > (II) No APM support in BIOS or kernel
2442 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "1024x768"
2443 > > (II) Loading extension NV-GLX
2444 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA 3D Acceleration Architecture Initialized
2445 > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Using the NVIDIA 2D acceleration architecture
2446 > > (**) NVIDIA(0): DPMS enabled
2447 > > (==) RandR enabled
2448 > > (II) Initializing extension GLX
2449 > > xkb_keycodes { include "xfree86+aliases(qwerty)" };
2450 > > xkb_types { include "complete" };
2451 > > xkb_compatibility { include "complete" };
2452 > > xkb_symbols { include "pc(pc105)+us" };
2453 > > xkb_geometry { include "pc(pc105)" };
2454 > > (II) Mouse0: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded
2455 > >
2456 > > > --
2457 > > > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
2458 > > >
2459 > > >
2460 > >
2461 > >
2462 > > --
2463 > > Erik
2464 > >
2465 >
2466 >
2467 > --
2468 > Erik
2469 > --
2470 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
2471 > --658509eb2ccd8f6
2472 > Content-Type: message/rfc822
2473 > Content-Disposition: inline;
2474 > filename="gentoo-user_54472.eml"
2475 >
2476 > Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2477 > Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com
2478 > [66.249.92.172])
2479 > by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HJB1f017473
2480 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:19:11 GMT
2481 > Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1708365ugc
2482 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:19:11 -0800
2483 > (PST)
2484 > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
2485 > s=beta; d=gmail.com;
2486 >
2487 > h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
2488 >
2489 > b=GpHAKAIk24zKuS/o/xaSDyvqEstYsHd36wRjSNxak7DXXBgydsVVNo6m/6T5QyY8Q9oPV3XC7p9gWhoWsLhTQmOO0ZTgJu2g3uNjKUTHSy/QI9IhUN7Iismv9Hv937EL7IjNzx+AxlCUXzmeqCz+o+Qmo1Cq1Tpg+QKT2uGvNlk=
2490 > Received: by 10.82.172.15 with SMTP id u15mr1638288bue.1163006350393;
2491 > Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:19:10 -0800 (PST)
2492 > Received: by 10.82.106.3 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:19:10 -0800 (PST)
2493 > Message-ID:
2494 > <7573e9640611080919t7dd68ddemd48d96031463cfd4@××××××××××.com>
2495 > Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:19:10 -0700
2496 > From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
2497 > Sender: richard.j.fish@×××××.com
2498 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2499 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iptables error
2500 > In-Reply-To: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es>
2501 > Precedence: bulk
2502 > List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2503 > List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o>
2504 > List-Unsubscribe:
2505 > <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o>
2506 > List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o>
2507 > List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
2508 > X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o
2509 > Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2510 > MIME-Version: 1.0
2511 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
2512 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2513 > Content-Disposition: inline
2514 > References: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es>
2515 > X-Google-Sender-Auth: f680c2630a22ad7b
2516 >
2517 > On 11/8/06, Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> wrote:
2518 > > Hi,
2519 > >
2520 > > I've done a kernel upgrade, from 2.6.16 to 17-r8 and my iptables stop
2521 > > working.
2522 > >
2523 > > I get this error:
2524 > >
2525 > > # iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.noviembre
2526 > > getsockopt failed strangely: No such file or directory
2527 >
2528 > I'd suggest you make a copy of this file and try to identify which
2529 > rule from this file is causing the error. It is a plain text file, so
2530 > you can comment out (with '#' characters) various rules (lines that
2531 > start with '[') to figure out which rule is causing the error.
2532 >
2533 > BTW, many of the filter options changed in recent kernels. You should
2534 > double check your kernel configuration and make sure you have at least
2535 >
2536 > CONFIG_NETFILTER=y
2537 > CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=m
2538 >
2539 > You'll also need at least some CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_* options under
2540 >
2541 > Networking->
2542 > Networking options ->
2543 > Network packet filtering ->
2544 > Core Netfilter Configuration ->
2545 >
2546 > -Richard
2547 > --
2548 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
2549 > --658509eb2ccd8f6
2550 > Content-Type: message/rfc822
2551 > Content-Disposition: inline;
2552 > filename="gentoo-user_54473.eml"
2553 >
2554 > Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2555 > Received: from gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de (gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de
2556 > [134.76.163.126])
2557 > by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HLIGs019183
2558 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:21:18 GMT
2559 > Received: by gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de (Postfix, from userid 8)
2560 > id 901BCFFB80; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:21:18 +0100 (CET)
2561 > Received: from localhost
2562 > (dslb-082-083-036-105.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.83.36.105])
2563 > by gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0AFFF421
2564 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:21:13 +0100
2565 > (CET)
2566 > Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:24:58 +0100
2567 > From: Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de>
2568 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2569 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iptables error
2570 > Message-Id: <20061108182458.0222c3fb.hilse@×××.de>
2571 > In-Reply-To: <20061108175013.32d7edf6@××××××××××××.es>
2572 > References: <20061108162945.78f83a9e@××××××××××××.es>
2573 > <20061108171620.a05e1510.hilse@×××.de>
2574 > <20061108173331.50db3ae7@××××××××××××.es>
2575 > <20061108175013.32d7edf6@××××××××××××.es>
2576 > X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i586-pc-linux-gnu)
2577 > Precedence: bulk
2578 > List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2579 > List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o>
2580 > List-Unsubscribe:
2581 > <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o>
2582 > List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o>
2583 > List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
2584 > X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o
2585 > Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2586 > Mime-Version: 1.0
2587 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
2588 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2589 > X-Spam-Details: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,
2590 > RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=2.64
2591 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on
2592 > gabriel.sub.uni-goettingen.de
2593 >
2594 > Hi,
2595 >
2596 > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:50:13 +0100
2597 > Arnau Bria <arnau@×××××××××.net> wrote:
2598 >
2599 > > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:33:31 +0100
2600 > > Arnau Bria wrote:
2601 > >
2602 > > > > As iptables is very depending on the kernel's API, did you
2603 > > > > - change kernel configuration?
2604 > > > nop. just make oldconfig with default values for new options.
2605 > >
2606 > > > > - try re-emerging iptables?
2607 > > I've recompiled iptables and I still have same problem...
2608 >
2609 > Hrm. Rethinking this, it might be due to an older set of include files
2610 > in /usr/include/linux. But don't change that, it'll break various
2611 > things. It might also be older an older interface used by glibc.
2612 >
2613 > Do you have other things emerged that are netfilter related?
2614 >
2615 > You can try to
2616 >
2617 > $ strace iptables-restore < iptables.saved
2618 >
2619 > and post the last 10-30 lines of output here. There'll probably be a
2620 > getsockopt call that fails.
2621 >
2622 > Also have a look at your kernel's "make menuconfig", the module
2623 > architecture for iptables has changed -- maybe "oldconfig" didn't do
2624 > its job well... but I doubt that, since I've compiled everything as
2625 > modules, too, and there's only the modules you mentioned first loaded
2626 > for me.
2627 >
2628 > Are you running with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" ? Maybe you should try for
2629 > iptables, e.g.
2630 >
2631 > $ ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge iptables
2632 >
2633 > that should give you iptables-1.3.6(-r1).
2634 >
2635 > -hwh
2636 > --
2637 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
2638 > --658509eb2ccd8f6
2639 > Content-Type: message/rfc822
2640 > Content-Disposition: inline;
2641 > filename="gentoo-user_54475.eml"
2642 >
2643 > Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2644 > Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com
2645 > [66.249.92.170])
2646 > by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HUaqY031432
2647 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:30:37 GMT
2648 > Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1711711ugc
2649 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:30:36 -0800
2650 > (PST)
2651 > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
2652 > s=beta; d=gmail.com;
2653 >
2654 > h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
2655 >
2656 > b=Azo8/tdNmmqS9S9P4iFDRzV26NxB1p4BWzQjB8SWszSrl8uL88YCrwFgt1VihjZ5KV9QrbDioBhF4h4hos3U4lusaIp1rJue8fgfRNZ13r0Zj1Os1cSunTeFeSfN33dXnra3vPMblZGRKsfLMLETEpFQh/KKmfNuiWKJYs0sjnw=
2657 > Received: by 10.82.98.13 with SMTP id v13mr1771444bub.1163007036192;
2658 > Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:30:36 -0800 (PST)
2659 > Received: by 10.82.106.3 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:30:36 -0800 (PST)
2660 > Message-ID:
2661 > <7573e9640611080930y6425d0b9r4f961b0eb170ef04@××××××××××.com>
2662 > Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:30:36 -0700
2663 > From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
2664 > Sender: richard.j.fish@×××××.com
2665 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2666 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WinXP under VMWare: no sound
2667 > In-Reply-To: <20061108170408.006c6f33.hilse@×××.de>
2668 > Precedence: bulk
2669 > List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2670 > List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o>
2671 > List-Unsubscribe:
2672 > <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o>
2673 > List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o>
2674 > List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
2675 > X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o
2676 > Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2677 > MIME-Version: 1.0
2678 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
2679 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2680 > Content-Disposition: inline
2681 > References: <200611042241.56613.sp_rm_it@×××××.it>
2682 > <200611080021.26494.sp_rm_it@×××××.it>
2683 >
2684 > <7573e9640611071608x16851fd3kfb5a817c9247ad50@××××××××××.com>
2685 > <200611080831.20344.sp_rm_it@×××××.it>
2686 > <20061108170408.006c6f33.hilse@×××.de>
2687 > X-Google-Sender-Auth: df0f9968b8e8713c
2688 >
2689 > On 11/8/06, Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de> wrote:
2690 > > You answered my last question about why you are mocking with "chmod +s"
2691 > > with something along the lines of "I felt like I had to". What makes
2692 > > you think you have to? Why should those libraries be set with setuid?
2693 >
2694 > This is necessary because vmware is a setuid executable, and you
2695 > cannot use LD_PRELOAD with setuid executables unless those libraries
2696 > are *also* setuid.
2697 >
2698 > Sergio, try doing chmod +s on
2699 > /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libaoss.so
2700 >
2701 > -Richard
2702 > --
2703 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
2704 > --658509eb2ccd8f6
2705 > Content-Type: message/rfc822
2706 > Content-Disposition: inline;
2707 > filename="gentoo-user_54476.eml"
2708 >
2709 > Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2710 > Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
2711 > by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8Hde66023058
2712 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:39:42 GMT
2713 > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
2714 > by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ACE64C47
2715 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:20:41 +0000
2716 > (UTC)
2717 > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
2718 > X-Spam-Score: -2.508
2719 > X-Spam-Level:
2720 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.508 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.091,
2721 > BAYES_00=-2.599]
2722 > Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
2723 > by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
2724 > with ESMTP id eFdbe7lnBXCT for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>;
2725 > Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:20:31 +0000 (UTC)
2726 > Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
2727 > (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
2728 > (No client certificate requested)
2729 > by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F82364C6F
2730 > for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:20:30 +0000 (UTC)
2731 > Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
2732 > id 1Ghr5m-0003xL-9q
2733 > for gentoo-user@g.o; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:20:02 +0100
2734 > Received: from dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net
2735 > ([84.61.158.233])
2736 > by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
2737 > id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
2738 > for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:20:02 +0100
2739 > Received: from skoehler by
2740 > dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim
2741 > 0.1 (Debian))
2742 > id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
2743 > for <gentoo-user@g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:20:02 +0100
2744 > X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
2745 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2746 > From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= <skoehler@×××.de>
2747 > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: switched from SiS to VIA chipset -> vesa
2748 > framebuffer broken
2749 > Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:19:50 +0100
2750 > Lines: 46
2751 > Message-ID: <eit3jn$2sv$1@×××××××××.org>
2752 > References: <eit2k6$uie$1@×××××××××.org>
2753 > Precedence: bulk
2754 > List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2755 > List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o>
2756 > List-Unsubscribe:
2757 > <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o>
2758 > List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o>
2759 > List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
2760 > X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o
2761 > Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2762 > Mime-Version: 1.0
2763 > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
2764 > protocol="application/pgp-signature";
2765 > boundary="------------enigD2AC6F2534E6DFB713C21EC0"
2766 > X-Complaints-To: usenet@×××××××××.org
2767 > X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:
2768 > dslb-084-061-158-233.pools.arcor-ip.net
2769 > User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
2770 > In-Reply-To: <eit2k6$uie$1@×××××××××.org>
2771 > X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1
2772 > Sender: news <news@×××××××××.org>
2773 >
2774 > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
2775 > --------------enigD2AC6F2534E6DFB713C21EC0
2776 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
2777 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2778 >
2779 > > this is a really strange issue i'm having:
2780 > >=20
2781 > > i changed the motherboard, nothing else. I know have a K8T800Pro based
2782 > > motherboard. The old one was SiS-chipset based.
2783 > >=20
2784 > > So i was already running the vesa frambuffer at 1280x1024, 16-bit. And
2785 > > actually it worked perfect!
2786 > >=20
2787 > > No, after the switch to the VIA-chipset based Motherboard, i don't see
2788 > > the text that's printed to the screen. The resulition is switched, but
2789 > > the upper half of the screen stays black. When the text reaches the
2790 > > lower half, then i see the text, and then we come to the point, where
2791 > > the consolefont is set. And guess what:
2792 > >=20
2793 > > then suddenly everything works. I can see the text on the whole screen
2794 > > and so on.
2795 > >=20
2796 > > So something is wrong here.
2797 > >=20
2798 > > Any clue, how i might fix it?
2799 >
2800 > So my theory is, that the System-BIOS (which uses graphics mode too,
2801 > IMHO) does some strange initialization of the graphics card, and the
2802 > linux-kernel doesn't reset it.
2803 >
2804 >
2805 > --------------enigD2AC6F2534E6DFB713C21EC0
2806 > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
2807 > Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
2808 > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
2809 >
2810 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
2811 > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
2812 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
2813 >
2814 > iD8DBQFFUhG27Ww7FjRBE4ARAqieAKCWQqaYoc3iKeGAt04qkt0CMyarfACfaaDS
2815 > C50+Db/ulusQ/n7RJKT6ZA8=
2816 > =6zOv
2817 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2818 >
2819 > --------------enigD2AC6F2534E6DFB713C21EC0--
2820 >
2821 > --
2822 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
2823 > --658509eb2ccd8f6
2824 > Content-Type: message/rfc822
2825 > Content-Disposition: inline;
2826 > filename="gentoo-user_54477.eml"
2827 >
2828 > Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2829 > Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com
2830 > [66.249.92.175])
2831 > by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8Hkd7k006792
2832 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:46:40 GMT
2833 > Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1716458ugc
2834 > for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:46:39 -0800
2835 > (PST)
2836 > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
2837 > s=beta; d=gmail.com;
2838 >
2839 > h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
2840 >
2841 > b=VCg4mVrovzHwBABGKirev/f5pquGwZorK3pEvTg2qHUDnitQES38cdCwl8sl/crt9NKoG2tKFtoRSAZ8/B6m8l65r+/nj9t7PySYr0gPoz7eUts19Csv/HGcGLfr+J/eYdWgVohKvRq+5fCGMv2f6kuPZrlhB2Z3QDIYxj0s3nY=
2842 > Received: by 10.82.111.8 with SMTP id j8mr1777128buc.1163007999011;
2843 > Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:46:39 -0800 (PST)
2844 > Received: by 10.82.106.3 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:46:33 -0800 (PST)
2845 > Message-ID:
2846 > <7573e9640611080946w2bae4dfai5d0620ff5688efaf@××××××××××.com>
2847 > Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:46:33 -0700
2848 > From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
2849 > Sender: richard.j.fish@×××××.com
2850 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2851 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Seamonkey and spam filter
2852 > In-Reply-To: <4551D9E9.9000104@××××××××××.net>
2853 > Precedence: bulk
2854 > List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
2855 > List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@g.o>
2856 > List-Unsubscribe:
2857 > <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@g.o>
2858 > List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@g.o>
2859 > List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
2860 > X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@g.o
2861 > Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o
2862 > MIME-Version: 1.0
2863 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
2864 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2865 > Content-Disposition: inline
2866 > References: <455119BE.3050007@××××××××××.net>
2867 > <45518BC0.6070700@××××××××.com>
2868 > <4551D9E9.9000104@××××××××××.net>
2869 > X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4a2aac708b12602c
2870 >
2871 > On 11/8/06, Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net> wrote:
2872 > > I have been doing that for some time now and it still marks them as spam.
2873 > > It is not always the same people but certain ones do get picked on a lot.
2874 > > It seems to get it by subject too I guess.
2875 >
2876 > How about setting up a message filter for gentoo-user. I believe if
2877 > you setup a filter to deliver the mail to a specific box, it will
2878 > bypass any spam filtering (been awhile since I used mozilla mail
2879 > clients, so not entire sure however). You could also add the specific
2880 > people to your contacts, which should help the spam filter figure out
2881 > that they are not spammers.
2882 >
2883 > > Any ideas where this info is kept? I thought of unmerging and then
2884 > > cleaning out the directory and emerging it again. I'm not sure that will
2885 > > work either though.
2886 >
2887 > I *think* it is in the training.dat file in your profile directory
2888 > (~/.mozilla/..). Unfortunately this is not something that you can
2889 > edit. You can however reset [1] the data through the junk mail
2890 > controls in seamonkey.
2891 >
2892 > [1]
2893 > http://opensourcearticles.com/thunderbird_15/english/part_05
2894 >
2895 > -Richard
2896 > --
2897 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
2898 > --658509eb2ccd8f6--
2899 >
2900 >
2901 >
2902 >
2903
2904
2905 --
2906 You can see what's happening at http://muhlesteins.com
2907
2908 --
2909 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest of gentoo-user@gentoo.org issue 985 (54428-54477) Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au>