1 |
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Filipe Sousa <natros@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Mark Knecht wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> | On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx> wrote: |
8 |
> | |
9 |
> | It's an interesting question and one I've not tried to test. Does an |
10 |
> | AMD64 machine running a 32-bit or 64-bit install run faster or slower |
11 |
> |
12 |
> | with one or the other. For all of my everyday work - Gnome, Firefox, |
13 |
> | web browsing, email, MythTV, etc., it's been my assumption that there |
14 |
> | wouldn't be any noticeble difference. I run 64-bit but assume I'd run |
15 |
> |
16 |
> | at more or less the same speed if I ran 32-bit. I may be wrong. Anyone |
17 |
> | have any measured data? Same machine, two installs? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I have a few numbers from genlop -t |
20 |
> |
21 |
<SNIP> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> These times are from the same machine: |
24 |
> abit ip35 pro, c2quad q6600 (2.4ghz), 4gb ram, (320+320) sataII raid0 (155-MB/s) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> - -- |
27 |
> Filipe Sousa |
28 |
|
29 |
Nice numbers and nice machine. Must have set you back a bit. ;-) |
30 |
|
31 |
It seems when I match up exact revisions you're getting something |
32 |
between a 10-15% speed increase. Quite nice. |
33 |
|
34 |
Do we know that the amount code compiled is identical? I imagine |
35 |
everything you show is correct since the speed increase is pretty |
36 |
consistent from app to app. |
37 |
|
38 |
Great stuff. Thanks. |
39 |
|
40 |
Cheers, |
41 |
Mark |
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |