1 |
On Saturday 05 May 2007, "Marko Kocić" <marko.kocic@×××××.com> wrote |
2 |
about '[gentoo-user] Wesnoth version': |
3 |
> Is there a specific reason why gentoo doesn't provide development |
4 |
> versions of Battle for Wesnoth (games-strategy/wesnoth)? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I couldn't find anything in bug database. Development versions (1.3.2) |
7 |
> are pretty stable, so I can't see a reason why are not included in |
8 |
> "~x86". As for "x86", 1.2.4 (latest stable) seems ok. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Should I open a bug for that? |
11 |
|
12 |
Yeah, a new numbered release deserves it's own ebuild, even if it has to |
13 |
linger in package.mask. Make sure it's been 2-3 days after the release |
14 |
and then file a version bump bug. Please report if "simply renaming" the |
15 |
existing ebuild works and/or what you had to change to get a clean |
16 |
compile/install. |
17 |
|
18 |
If you follow Wesnoth closely, but aren't part of upstream, you might |
19 |
consider becoming a/the gentoo package maintainer for it. IIRC, IMHO, the |
20 |
packaging for Wesnoth could use a little "love". |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. |
24 |
bss03@××××××××××.net ((_/)o o(\_)) |
25 |
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' |
26 |
http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/ |